Discussion:
Special Report: Keep Your Hypocrisy-Stained Hands Off Our President
(too old to reply)
Joe Cooper
2017-12-14 19:12:55 UTC
Permalink
They’ll never get him because the people have already spoken.
There is a profound difference between (i) the soap-opera charges now
being leveled by some opportunistic women against President Donald Trump
and leveraged for cheap political gain by the Gillibrand Hypocrites
within the Democrat Party and (ii) the pants-dropping of The Icon, John
Conyers, and the butt-squeezing, tongue-slithering obscenities of Sen. Al
Franken (who now indeed will have to leave the upper chamber, with no Roy
Moore to counterbalance). Conyers and Franken have lost all legitimacy.
By contrast, the American people elected President Trump with full
transparent cognition of his public and private portfolio, thereby
validating his office.

1. Personal Character Allegations Were Litigated Fully with Transparency
in 2016, and the Voters Acted as Jury.

The difference between the President and Disgraced Franken-Conyers is
that the charges against President Trump fully were litigated before the
voters during the 2016 Presidential election. We heard the Billy Bush
trailer tape. We read the New York Times front-page stories quoting
former beauty contestants — some of whom rebutted the allegations and
quotes ascribed to them. The voters knew all about it. And, fully
apprised, the American people elected Donald Trump to be President.

That is how democracy works. Each side sets forth its best case — which,
unfortunately, consists mostly of setting forth the other candidate’s
worst case. There are ads, robocalls, newsmedia exposés and dirt-
excavations, and finally debates during which each side gets to throw at
the opponent all the dirt, mud, slime, grime, feces, and other schmutz
their advisers can get their hands on. Before the debate they shake hands
and promise to come out fighting clean. By the end, they not only need to
soak their limbs with hand sanitizer but also to drink half a bottle of
the stuff.

We knew all the filth about Hillary Clinton: her lies, her federal
spoliation crimes that still await a fair and proper investigation and
prosecution, her two-faced deceitfulness, her role in the Benghazi
murders of American heroes and her attempted cover-up, her conniving
lying to the bereaved widows and parents of the fallen, her role in
approving the transfer of American nuclear material to Vladimir Putin
even as her better half got paid $500,000 for some reason, her $125,000
honoraria for clandestine 15-minute speeches on Wall Street, her utter
physical collapse on a Manhattan street on September 11, the false story
of how she was named at birth for Sir Edmund Hillary, the lie that she
arrived in Bosnia heroically under gunfire, her episode of screaming for
half an hour at the Prime Minister of Israel and deeming Jewish home-
building in East Jerusalem to be illegal, her presiding over the fall of
the Crimea thanks to her “reset button,” her disastrous endorsement of
the Trans-Pacific Partnership and of other calamitous multi-lateral trade
agreements that worked against American workers, her promise to put coal
workers out of jobs, her refusal to approve the Keystone pipeline, her
giggles remembering the time she helped an admitted child rapist go free,
her prior experiences with Whitewater and Cattle Futures and Travelgate
and character-assassinating women whom her better half raped or otherwise
sexually molested, her calling 63 million good hard-working Americans a
“basketful of deplorables,” her bleaching her computer hard drive that
she had secreted in a bathroom in her home, her playing the race card,
her playing the gender card (“Deal me in!”), her playing the ethnicity
card, her ignoring Wisconsin, Michigan, and other Rust Belt states while
foolishly campaigning to run up the vote in Sunny California where her
Harvey Weinstein crowd of Hollywood sycophants pumped her full of bucks
after long days on casting couches.

That is what a Presidential election or any election is. We saw all the
Hillary we could stomach, and we likewise saw the good, the bad, and the
ugly of Donald Trump. We heard the Billy Bush tape played so often, night
and day, day after day, on the leftist mainstream media that we would
have mistaken it for the National Anthem — but for the fact that Colin
Kaepernick did not take a knee when it aired. We saw a lifetime of
Republican Crowd Debates, and we saw Trump’s good side, his ridiculous
side, and the side from which we recoiled. We heard and saw Marco Rubio
take his best shots at Trump, John Kasich take his best shots, and all
the others from Carly Fiorina — what in the world was she ever doing
there? — to Rand Paul to Ted Cruz take their best shots. The election
unfolded as it did, and the American people as jury rendered their
verdict, choosing Donald Trump to be the 45th President of the United
States.

2. The Hillary Whiners and Democrat Sore Losers Have Rejected the
Voters’ Clear Choice with Blind “Resistance” for a Year by Pursuing
Cynical Scheme After Cynical Scheme to Sabotage the Duly Elected
President.

From the day Mr. Trump was elected, the Democrats have concocted one ruse
after another to sabotage the democratic will of the American electorate.
First they challenged the authenticity of the vote counts. After Trump
gained votes during many of the recounts, they shifted course and
appealed to members of the Electoral College to violate their sworn oaths
and vote for the loser. Then, when the Electors stood by their pledges of
honor and elected Donald Trump to be the 45th President of the United
States, they challenged the very legitimacy of the Electoral College
itself. Then they tried to get celebrities not to perform at the
Inauguration. In the alternative, they showed up in their puerile vagina
hats, with faux courage saying that they contemplated blowing up the
White House. Then they tried to prevent his cabinet choices from being
approved. Then they tried blackballing his Supreme Court selection to
serve as the next United States Justice. They brazenly emblazoned
themselves “The Resistance.” They blocked and delayed every Presidential
appointment possible. Every time he issued an executive order, they
forum-shopped in Hawaii or San Francisco to find a federal judge
appointed by Obama or Clinton to block the order, knowing that the
injunction would be affirmed by the liberal United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. They went on television, mocking his
penchant for tweeting 140 characters to the American people several times
daily, as he bypassed their biases and leveraged new technology to
articulate his thoughts directly to the public, unfiltered. They said
that he spends all day tweeting when he merely was sending out 500-2000
typed characters daily, consuming less time than a fifteen-minute salsa
in front of Raul Castro. Then they called him an anti-Semite because of
bomb threats anonymously dialed into Jewish Community Centers — as it
turned out, phoned in by a mentally ill teen calling from Israel. They
never apologized even though he issued warm statements on Jewish holy
days, sensitively memorialized the Shoah (Nazi Holocaust), ended eight
years of the Obama-Clinton-Kerry Hell that saw Israel constantly attacked
from a Washington that even allowed Israel to get gang-banged at the
United Nations Security Council. They still were calling him an anti-
Semite even as he announced finally that the 1995 near-unanimous law of
Congress would be implemented, and America formally now recognizes
Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and will move our Israeli embassy
there from Tel Aviv. (Indeed, his daughter is an Orthodox Jew, and
several of his grandchildren thus are Jewish — something that many of his
leftist Obama-supporting Jewish critics, to their shame, cannot say.)

Then the Democrats and left-liberals accused him of colluding with
Vladimir Putin to throw the election. These Democrats who never regarded
Putin as the problem, who mocked Republican warnings about the Soviets
and their Russian successors for half a century, as conservatives pleaded
for a stronger American posture amid Putin seizing Crimea and part of
Ukraine. In the 2012 Presidential debates, Obama mocked Mitt Romney for
deeming Putin a serious foe and obstacle to American values and security.
And then suddenly, having run out of anti-Trump obstructions, the
Democrats cynically reversed course and elevated Putin to the cause of
all woe, the conspirator with Trump. For a full year they have been
investigating the Trump White House, spending millions of our tax dollars
on a Robert Mueller witch hunt, conducted by the Clinton Deep State All-
Stars, a team of partisan Clinton Democrat sponsors and donors, and
documented virulent Trump haters. And what has been discovered after a
year? That Paul Manafort conducted private business overseas and bought
expensive clothes with his income. That Gen. Michael Flynn spoke with his
Russian counterpart to discuss American-Russian national security
concerns after the Trump election in the hopes of calming brewing
tensions as the Trump succession team prepared to enter elected office.
That James Comey leaked FBI documentary information to the New York Times
through a professor friend at Columbia Law School, drafted an exonerating
letter for Hillary Clinton before even concluding the rigged
investigation that spurred her better half to meet on an Arizona airport
tarmac for half an hour to discuss with Attorney General Loretta Lynch
their common interest in golf, and even allowed a pro-Clinton/Trump-
hating partisan to change the wording of the letter to mask Hillary’s
statutory crime of “gross negligence” by altering it to “extreme
carelessness.” And that a high-up guy in the Justice Department was in
cahoots all along with the Fusion GPS Hatchet & Fertilizer Company that
prepared the fake Trump dossier, while the guy’s wife was working all
along in that company’s paid employ. And that the Hillary Clinton
campaign paid for the libelous dossier. And that a guy named Podesta,
Tony the bro of John, was involved in the sordid mix. That is what
Mueller has found so far as his long-running show presumably qualifies
for a “Golden Globe” nomination and prepares to be picked up for a second
season after a summer of reruns.

Next they said that Donald Trump is a racist. Somehow, while he had been
in public life for half a century before, quite notorious in the public
eye, ever the media darling and spectacle, no one ever before had
associated him with racism. As he built hotels and casinos, as he hosted
a crazy but adorably popular and kitschy reality television show, no one
ever whispered “racist.” Somehow, no one — no Black leader, no White
Democrat liberal, no one in half a century ever saw a racist bone in the
loud, brash New Yorker. And it is not because he was admired like Mother
Teresa or Father Damien. Everyone always knew about “The Donald” and his
hubris, his screwy side. But no one, not even Jesse Jackson — who made
his “Rainbow Coalition” fame and fortune by huckstering for payoffs and
shaking down corporate executives with threats that he would boycott them
as “racist” if they did not cough up moolah — ever called Donald Trump a
racist. And then he got elected 45th President of the United States. And
suddenly the epithet — racist.

The man honors Martin Luther King — and they call him “racist.” He goes
to civil rights museums, and they call him “racist.” He meets in the Oval
Office with presidents of Black Colleges, and they call him “racist.” If
he goes to the Civil Rights museum to honor African American heroes and
their struggle for equality and justice, then they will not go. But if he
does not go, then they will go and say “Look at how the racist did not
come to the museum.” For half a century, no one ever accused him of
denying people employment or demoting them or underpaying them based on
color, ethnicity, creed, or sexual preference. And suddenly the
hypocritical likes of Nancy Pelosi, whose Congressional District
population is less than ten percent African American, calls him racist.

They likewise called him fascist and compared him to Hitler. “If Trump is
elected, we will lose our freedoms and become a fascist Nazi country.”
Did Hitler visit Civil Rights museums and say that all Germans bleed the
same red blood? Did Hitler celebrate Chanukah in the Reichstag and invite
rabbis to a telephone conference in advance of Rosh Hashanah to wish all
Jewish citizens blessings for a good and healthy New Year? When President
Trump’s executive orders on immigration were stifled by liberal Democrat-
appointed judges, did he have the judges arrested? No, he grumbled and
tweeted, but he honored the rule of law as laid out in the Constitution.
As the Democrats, the “Resistance,” have attempted to sabotage his every
step, has he had them detained? No, he has tweeted. He has turned to the
American public, exposing the plague of Fake News that permeates
everything from the Washington Post (tweeting half-empty stadiums?) to
the New York Times (watching eight hours a day of television?) to ABC
(Brian Ross?) to MSNBC (all of it) to CNN (employees terminated for Fake
News). He lives with the Fake News and unjustified smear jobs — Do we
really care whether he drinks more Coke than Obama snorted? — and he
responds by appealing to his supporters, honoring the Constitutional
process. We know the legislation he has wanted, but when the Republican
Senate would not give him the votes, he had to postpone repealing and
replacing Obamacare. When his proposed tax bill demanded horse-trading to
pass, he traded horses. In every way, he has been the consummate
Constitutional President, tested as no one since, yes, Lincoln and Andrew
Johnson. They even have the temerity to question his sanity, his mental
stability, his fitness under the 25th Amendment to hold high office,
claiming that he slurred three words while delivering a teleprompter
speech, even though he soon thereafter delivered a masterfully colorful,
articulate, and wildly crowd-pleasing 80-minute speech to tens of
thousands in Pensacola, Florida a few days later. It is not he but they
who slur — him — and the mental examinations that suddenly excite them
might first be tested on the likes of their own Maxine Waters to set a
base score.

3. Now the Latest Despicable Outrage: The Cynical Attempt to Equate the
President with the Disgraced Conyers and Franken, Hypocritically Led by
Kirsten Gillibrand Who Has Built Her Political Base by Enabling Women Sex
Abusers.

Regard the parasitic Gillibrand Hypocrites who lived luxuriously off the
rapacious Clintons until the Clintons had no more to offer them, who
abided and chummed with Al Franken and his manifest obscenities until
they saw greater value in dumping The Groper for the good of the team.
Now these deceitful scoundrels aver that Trump should be challenged based
on revived, yet stale, time-barred allegations from the kinds of women
who never experienced what Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Kathleen
Willey, or Monica Lewinsky endured at the seat of power.

Understand that Kirsten Gillibrand was among the enablers and promoters
of the Bill Clinton who sexually abused, physically assaulted, and even
raped. We all knew. Everyone knew. Kirsten Gillibrand knew. “I hope
you’re as excited as I am that we have President Clinton here in
Watertown!” she crowed at one campaign rally. The internet is filled with
photographs of excited smiling Gillibrand clutching Bill’s hands or
letting Clinton put his arm around her and laughing with him, exulting
that she had spent time with him up-close campaigning alongside him. She
knew exactly who he was and what he had done to physically abuse
subordinate and defenseless women again and again. No wonder Clinton
adviser Philippe Reines wrote about her: “Over 20 yrs you took the
Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite.”

Gillibrand is despicable in her two-faced position on “defending women.”
Would you call a person who advocates female genital mutilation a “woman-
hating sex abuser”? If so, then Kirsten Gillibrand has empowered other
women sex abusers. Consider: Linda Sarsour, a prominent hater on the
Left, posted this about two Muslim women who publicly have decried
radical Islamic extremists: “Brigitte Gabriel = Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She’s
asking 4 an a$$ whippin’. I wish I could take their vaginas away — they
don’t deserve to be women.” Yet this vicious hater and female misogynist
— imagine if Trump had said to Billy Bush “I wish I could take their
vaginas away” — has been praised repeatedly by Gillibrand. On at least
one occasion, Kirsten Gillibrand called this vicious woman sex-abuser
“[one of the] suffragists of our time.” Gillibrand further beamed that
“it was an honor to write about” Sarsour, praising her in a Time magazine
cover story. An avalanche of angry attacks against Gillibrand followed on
social media, and even the New York Times published an op-ed educating
the public about the hate-filled Sarsour while noting in shock how
Gillibrand had gushed over this female misogynist with admiration.

This latest Trump-bullying scheme will fail as have all the others. The
effort to equate President Trump’s legitimacy with the disgrace of
Conyers or Franken fails facially. One difference is that Al Franken went
to the electorate with his groping background hidden from the voters, his
hands in his pockets or stuffing ballots, and his tongue in his own
mouth. John Conyers presented himself to the voters while wearing pants.
Truly — truly — let Franken now go to the voters, and if they elect him
to the Senate now, then touché! Let Conyers present himself for an
Election Day validation, and if validated — good for him! Charley Rangel
did it after being zonked by the House Ethics Committee, and he
prevailed. Because that is how America works. It is a democracy, and the
voters decide. The people speak and render their verdict as jury.

As of now, the people of Minnesota never have been asked whether they
would elect to the Senate the Lingua Franken that we now all know. The
Detroit voters never have been asked whether they would choose a
Congressman who contracts his breeches.

By contrast, the American people indeed were presented with the clear
understanding of who Donald Trump is, what his background is, where he
failed in the past. They knew about and debated the corporate
bankruptcies. They knew about Billy Bush in the trailer. And the people
of the United States freely decided. He was elected with full
transparency by a body-slamming 306-232 electoral college runaway. The
issues were litigated fully, the jury returned with a resounding verdict
for Trump. That case is closed, free of double jeopardy.

Let the message be clear to the Gillibrand Hypocrites who enable sex
offenders and gush over sex abusers, and to the Groping Democrat Phonies
who have lived off the Harvey Weinsteins, Al Frankens, and iconic John
Conyerses for all too long: Keep your hypocrisy-stained hands off our
President.

Source: http://bit.ly/2zdhou9
--
"The Marxists, communists and fascists of the Democrat Party have
launched a strategy of deception, projection, and a new generation of
brown shirts who fanatically believe that their violence is honorable,
and necessary, to save America from some kind of a Fourth Reich
perpetrated by the GOP." (Douglas Gibbs )
PIBB
2017-12-14 20:49:54 UTC
Permalink
They'll never get him because the people have already spoken.
That's certainly what Trump is hoping. Sadly for him, he may have
misjudged this one.
Bob Flora
2017-12-14 22:07:28 UTC
Permalink
They’ll never get him because the people have already spoken.
There is a profound difference between (i) the soap-opera charges now
...
Source: http://bit.ly/2zdhou9
American Spectator, verbatim.

From my origins in the late 80's with "echoes" on the old peer-to-peer
network Fidonet there has been a somewhat ethical standard for postings.
These are and were newsgroups meant for personal comments and opinions,
not broadcasting or blatant verbatim copies from some magazine or other,
especially with no personal input whatsoever.

The result of your blatant copying from a right wing website is to
suggest that these are your ideas when they clearly are not, instead
showing that you are simply a parrot, with no original ideas of your
own. Why the copy; why waste spaced here; why not just show the IRL and
quit? Then again, write something original and let us see what you're
really made of.
Xavier
2017-12-15 15:08:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Flora
They’ll never get him because the people have already spoken.
There is a profound difference between (i) the soap-opera charges now
...
Source: http://bit.ly/2zdhou9
American Spectator, verbatim.
From my origins in the late 80's with "echoes" on the old peer-to-peer
network Fidonet there has been a somewhat ethical standard for postings.
These are and were newsgroups meant for personal comments and opinions,
not broadcasting or blatant verbatim copies from some magazine or other,
especially with no personal input whatsoever.
The result of your blatant copying from a right wing website is to
suggest that these are your ideas when they clearly are not, instead
showing that you are simply a parrot, with no original ideas of your
own. Why the copy; why waste spaced here; why not just show the IRL and
quit? Then again, write something original and let us see what you're
really made of.
Or else post truth and objective material from the likes of the NYTimes,
WaPo, the Networks, CNN, MSNBC, Time, Newsweek, NPR, PBS, Salon, Mother
Jones, Daily Kos, Huffington, Slate, and similar sources that have
brainwashed, er, educated us the past 60 years, eh comrade.
Bob Flora
2017-12-23 00:31:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Xavier
Post by Bob Flora
They’ll never get him because the people have already spoken.
There is a profound difference between (i) the soap-opera charges now
...
Source: http://bit.ly/2zdhou9
American Spectator, verbatim.
From my origins in the late 80's with "echoes" on the old peer-to-peer
network Fidonet there has been a somewhat ethical standard for postings.
These are and were newsgroups meant for personal comments and opinions,
not broadcasting or blatant verbatim copies from some magazine or other,
especially with no personal input whatsoever.
The result of your blatant copying from a right wing website is to
suggest that these are your ideas when they clearly are not, instead
showing that you are simply a parrot, with no original ideas of your
own. Why the copy; why waste spaced here; why not just show the IRL and
quit? Then again, write something original and let us see what you're
really made of.
Or else post truth and objective material from the likes of the NYTimes,
WaPo, the Networks, CNN, MSNBC, Time, Newsweek, NPR, PBS, Salon, Mother
Jones, Daily Kos, Huffington, Slate, and similar sources that have
brainwashed, er, educated us the past 60 years, eh comrade.
NO, yoyo. Write ORIGINAL ideas and beliefs that express your OWN
thoughts, not those of someone else. This message group was never meant
to be used either for broadcasting or as a second hand magazine.
Governor Swill
2018-01-03 03:51:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Flora
Post by Joe Cooper
They’ll never get him because the people have already spoken.
There is a profound difference between (i) the soap-opera charges now
...
Source: http://bit.ly/2zdhou9
American Spectator, verbatim.
From my origins in the late 80's with "echoes" on the old peer-to-peer
network Fidonet there has been a somewhat ethical standard for postings.
These are and were newsgroups meant for personal comments and opinions,
not broadcasting or blatant verbatim copies from some magazine or other,
especially with no personal input whatsoever.
The result of your blatant copying from a right wing website is to
suggest that these are your ideas when they clearly are not, instead
showing that you are simply a parrot, with no original ideas of your
own. Why the copy; why waste spaced here; why not just show the IRL and
quit? Then again, write something original and let us see what you're
really made of.
That's something Joe never does. He could, as most of us do, make a
point and illustrate it with a url to a resource but he's far too
stupid and illiterate to compose anything cogent on his own.

Swill
--
How do you propose we pay for Trumps trillion
dollar border wall and Trumps trillion dollar
infrastructure plan and Trump's trillion dollar
defense budget? - Mitchell Holman

With a trillion dollar tax cut? - Swill
Loading...