Discussion:
Rightardia: Right wing attacks on progressive writers are mostly ad hominem
(too old to reply)
Rightardia
2010-07-08 20:12:29 UTC
Permalink
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.

Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.

Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.

A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.

Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.

This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.

An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.

Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.

Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.

Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.

I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.

My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.

The pen is mightier than the sword.







_ _ _

Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism. Slow
thinkers keep right.
Buster Norris
2010-07-09 02:20:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............

From: Secular Human <***@gmail.com>
From: Middle Class Warrior <***@gmail.com>
From: eelder100 <***@gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
From: Middle Class Warrior <***@gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...

hahahahahah!!

=== UPDATE ===============

As of 1/11/10:

Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com

hahahahahah!!

=== UPDATE ===============

As of 3/24/10:

Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

=== UPDATE ===============

As of 4/07/10:

http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9

Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!

That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!

=== UPDATE ===============

As of 6/18/10:

Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============

From: Rightardia <***@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Rightardia.Com is owned by:
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Rightardia
2010-07-10 17:36:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9
Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!
That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Netcraft ratings change weekly. According to Netcraft there are
108,810,358 distinct web sites.

To give you an idea of where the Rightardia site fits in, the
http://www.hannity.com/ is ranked 80,204 by Netcraft.

See http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html

As usual, Buster Norris aka Bob Milby, Jr gets it wrong.
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
Buster Norris
2010-07-11 03:27:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9
Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!
That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Netcraft ratings change weekly. According to Netcraft there are
108,810,358 distinct web sites.
So???
Post by Rightardia
To give you an idea of where the Rightardia site fits in, the
http://www.hannity.com/ is ranked 80,204 by Netcraft.
See http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html
So???
Post by Rightardia
As usual, Buster Norris aka Bob Milby, Jr gets it wrong.
What do you think I got wrong ERIC?

What does your attempt to distract have to do with THE FACT that PG
trashed your gay blog and THE FACT that your rankings are GOING
DOWN???

Hey ERIC - Lets check!!!!

As of 6/18/10: Netcraft rank: 14328

As of 7/10/10: Netcraft rank: 15766
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=rightardia.blogspot.com

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3 weeks and -9% DROP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rightardia
2010-07-11 03:56:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9
Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!
That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Netcraft ratings change weekly. According to Netcraft there are
108,810,358 distinct web sites.
So???
Post by Rightardia
To give you an idea of where the Rightardia site fits in, the
http://www.hannity.com/ is ranked 80,204 by Netcraft.
See http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html
So???
Post by Rightardia
As usual, Buster Norris aka Bob Milby, Jr gets it wrong.
What do you think I got wrong ERIC?
What does your attempt to distract have to do with THE FACT that PG
trashed your gay blog and THE FACT that your rankings are GOING
DOWN???
Hey ERIC - Lets check!!!!
As of 6/18/10: Netcraft rank: 14328
As of 7/10/10: Netcraft rank: 15766
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=rightardia.blogspot.com
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3 weeks and -9% DROP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you knew much you would know that Rightardia's ratings are higher
than Sean Hannity's web site. There are 108,810,358 web sites on the
net. The Daily KOS is ranked higher than Limbaugh's web site.

If you understood Democrats better, you would know we don't publish for
clicks. We publish to make America a better country by informing
ignoramuses like yourself.
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
Buster Norris
2010-07-12 04:51:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9
Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!
That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Netcraft ratings change weekly. According to Netcraft there are
108,810,358 distinct web sites.
So???
Post by Rightardia
To give you an idea of where the Rightardia site fits in, the
http://www.hannity.com/ is ranked 80,204 by Netcraft.
See http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html
So???
Post by Rightardia
As usual, Buster Norris aka Bob Milby, Jr gets it wrong.
What do you think I got wrong ERIC?
What does your attempt to distract have to do with THE FACT that PG
trashed your gay blog and THE FACT that your rankings are GOING
DOWN???
Hey ERIC - Lets check!!!!
As of 6/18/10: Netcraft rank: 14328
As of 7/10/10: Netcraft rank: 15766
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=rightardia.blogspot.com
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3 weeks and -9% DROP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you knew much you would know that Rightardia's ratings are higher
than Sean Hannity's web site. There are 108,810,358 web sites on the
net. The Daily KOS is ranked higher than Limbaugh's web site.
07.27.09 - Netcraft Needs to Clean House or Become IrrelevantPosted
http://techrights.org/2009/07/27/netcraft-and-microsoft-gaming/

Netcraft's methodology is bogus...... That means your rank is even
WORSE................

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
If you understood Democrats better, you would know we don't publish for
clicks.
Of course you do.
Post by Rightardia
We publish to make America a better country by informing
ignoramuses like yourself.
Your MANY documented LIES prove you are LYING AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor Eric........... Into your Golden Years and all you have to show
for it is a dumpy house with no pool, and blog nobody reads..........

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rightardia
2010-07-10 17:40:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9
Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!
That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Patriot Games and Busterr Norris are too stupid to write a blog. Who are
you kidding? Both are USENET spam kings.
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
Buster Norris
2010-07-11 03:33:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
Post by Buster Norris
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
Bullshit.....................
Post by Rightardia
A standard tactic that conservative trolls use, it to suggest the
article needs a citation although Rightardia and most progressive
posters include a source reference. Rightardia provides sources with
close to 90 per cent of tis articles with the exception of videos.
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "to the
man"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise
to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.
You sure do cry like a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
Why would they do this? Many of the T-Bagger type of posters on USENET
are poorly educated or too lazy to do valid research to refute an
argument. It is easier for them to suggest that the progressive poster
is gay, stupid, un-American or a communist.
Many of the conservatives who used to post don't anymore because their
articles were highly biased or contained factual errors. One good
example of this was Jose Soplar who used to post long treatises that
contained an assortment of misinformation when Bush was president.
I recall one article in which Jose suggested the Shah of Iran was a good
guy. The Shah was actually a dictator and US puppet who never had the
support of the Iranian people.
My advise to progressives: keep on posting. Let them Spam your posts. My
blogs ratings improve when there is controversy. Ignore the right wing
bastards.
Your gay blog ratings have NEVER improved and have been flushed into
the toilet by Patriot Games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Bullshit.............
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.168.18.237
NNTP-Posting-Host: ...news.usenetmonster.com
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500, Middle Class Warrior
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games is the liar. Rightardia is a news blog that has
several writers.
"Editor-in-chief: Middle Class Warrior"
Post by Rightardia
It is ranked by Netcraft as one of the top 5000
web sites in the world.
Try again... Your personal blog is ranked 4,217 out of 5,000 which
means 84.32% think you suck...
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Your personal blog is ranked 4,347 out of 5,000 which
means 86.94% think you suck...
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
hahahahahah!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 7,157
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
89.31% think YOU SUCK!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/topsites?s=CF28AA078226F697A41D0E714CC9
Netcraft rank: 7,963 out of 8,013!!!
That means 99.37% THINK YOU SUCK!!!
=== UPDATE ===============
Netcraft rank: 14328
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://rightardia.blogspot.com
=== UPDATE ===============
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010
Post by Rightardia
I own the name rightardia.com .
Eric Charles Elder (64)
Mary W Elder
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Patriot Games and Busterr Norris are too stupid to write a blog.
PG wouldn't waste his time with a silly little Google-supplied canned
blog. He made a website....

Where's your website???

http://rightardia.com/ = Nothing there........................

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You sure are a LOOOOOOOOOOOOZER!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SilentOtto
2010-07-13 00:39:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games and Busterr Norris are too stupid to write a blog. Who are
you kidding? Both are USENET spam kings.
You mean....

"Patriot Games and Buster Norris -is- too stupid to write a blog."

The proof that Queer BOY is running a sock-puppet, from identical
paste jobs (both Queer BOY use the same paste jobs, down to the line
spacing) to posting style, target list, user agent and the fact that
they both frequently use agent's feature that sends all the posts at
once, is so overwhelming that nothing more need be said on that
matter.

The reason Queer BOY created his Buster Norris sock is that there were
too many progressive posters on these groups who's posts Queer BOY
publicly proclaimed that he didn't read.

Queer BOY can't stand it when someone else gets the last word, yet he
couldn't respond to posters he supposedly doesn't read lest everyone
throw is previous proclamation in his face.

So, he created Buster to cyber-stalk all the posters he claims he
ignores.

For example...

I poke Queer BOY with a pointy stick when the mood strikes me, and for
the past year or so his standard response has been to reply with some
paste job or another.

Suddenly he stopped replying all together.

When?

At the exact time "Buster Norris" showed up.

What a coincidence!

Plus, creating the "Buster Norris" sock helps disguise the fact that
he spends -all- day on Usenet.

He comes on in the early morning, and posts his articles. Through
late morning and early afternoon he argues with any respondents. In
late afternoon he starts his cyber-stalking with his "Oops, caught
lying again" posts/reposts/paste jobs and in the evening he switches
over to Buster and cyber-stalks anyone who's bitch slapped him too
many times.

The old fag isn't fooling me with his sock-puppet and I'd hate to
think he's fooling you.
Post by Rightardia
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
Buster Norris
2010-07-13 04:51:21 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:39:31 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
Post by SilentOtto
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games and Busterr Norris are too stupid to write a blog. Who are
you kidding? Both are USENET spam kings.
You mean....
"Patriot Games and Buster Norris -is- too stupid to write a blog."
The proof that Queer BOY is running a sock-puppet, from identical
paste jobs (both Queer BOY use the same paste jobs, down to the line
spacing) to posting style, target list, user agent and the fact that
they both frequently use agent's feature that sends all the posts at
once, is so overwhelming that nothing more need be said on that
matter.
The posts are identical because they come from THE SAME
PLACE....................

You nigger cowards are really stupid.............

Go to PG's website, see it yourself, the stuff is already
pre-formatted and one click copies it............

You nigger cowards are really stupid.............
Buster Norris
2010-07-13 04:51:33 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:39:31 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
<***@hotmail.com> wrote:

The famous MonkeyOtto chit-chat has gone, replaced with FEAR,
replaced with LOATHING and HATRED............

You can't run,
you can't hide,
we will meet,
I will punish you...........

SissyOtto has nowhere to RUN.........

PussyOtto has nowhere to hide............

RetardOtto can't change the subject..............

CowardOtto is a Buster-BUSTED Coward..................

StupidOtto is POUNDED and POUNDED and POUNDED
as EVERYONE watches and points and laughs..............

The COWARD NiggyOtto tried to change the subject................

The COWARD NiggyOtto tried to RUN AWAY!!!!!!!

Everybody saw MonkeyOtto try to run...............

Everybody saw MonkeyOtto try to HIDE..................

Everybody saw MonkeyOtto LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You said I didn't have your address, then you said I did have your
address, NOW EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU'RE A LIAR..........................

Were you lying the 1st time 0R were you lying the 2nd time, SissyOtto?

You challenged me THEN RAN AND HID like a dark brown high school
dropout, PussyOtto......

EVERYBODY sees your cowardice, RetardOtto.........

I'm still waiting on you, NiggerOtto.

Let's do this, COWARD................

I'm right here BOY, in your face BOY, and I'm not leaving
BOY...........

I'm still waiting on you, CowardOtto.

Still waiting on you, NiggerOtto..............................
Post by SilentOtto
Post by Rightardia
Patriot Games and Busterr Norris are too stupid to write a blog. Who are
you kidding? Both are USENET spam kings.
You mean....
"Patriot Games and Buster Norris -is- too stupid to write a blog."
The proof that Queer BOY is running a sock-puppet, from identical
paste jobs (both Queer BOY use the same paste jobs, down to the line
spacing) to posting style, target list, user agent and the fact that
they both frequently use agent's feature that sends all the posts at
once, is so overwhelming that nothing more need be said on that
matter.
The reason Queer BOY created his Buster Norris sock is that there were
too many progressive posters on these groups who's posts Queer BOY
publicly proclaimed that he didn't read.
Queer BOY can't stand it when someone else gets the last word, yet he
couldn't respond to posters he supposedly doesn't read lest everyone
throw is previous proclamation in his face.
So, he created Buster to cyber-stalk all the posters he claims he
ignores.
For example...
I poke Queer BOY with a pointy stick when the mood strikes me, and for
the past year or so his standard response has been to reply with some
paste job or another.
Suddenly he stopped replying all together.
When?
At the exact time "Buster Norris" showed up.
What a coincidence!
Plus, creating the "Buster Norris" sock helps disguise the fact that
he spends -all- day on Usenet.
He comes on in the early morning, and posts his articles. Through
late morning and early afternoon he argues with any respondents. In
late afternoon he starts his cyber-stalking with his "Oops, caught
lying again" posts/reposts/paste jobs and in the evening he switches
over to Buster and cyber-stalks anyone who's bitch slapped him too
many times.
The old fag isn't fooling me with his sock-puppet and I'd hate to
think he's fooling you.
Post by Rightardia
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
softsofa
2010-07-09 20:02:49 UTC
Permalink
[blahblahblah whinewhinewhine]
You spamming disinformation bloggers fancy yourselves to be
journalists. But you're T-ballers trying out in the little-league
world of Usenet. You don't make the cut.

You think you're "pro"s, yet you can't handle amateur writers like
Haskell or Norris. Writing is your specialty (after spamming), but
their simple musings have you all atwitter.

Man up... or, in your case, being cast-iron Progressive ideologues,
transgender up.


Rightardia: The progressive alternative to the majors... or the
minors, or the basement. Slow thinkers like our slow plays.



[]softsofa[]
Rightardia
2010-07-10 17:45:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by softsofa
[blahblahblah whinewhinewhine]
You spamming disinformation bloggers fancy yourselves to be
journalists. But you're T-ballers trying out in the little-league
world of Usenet. You don't make the cut.
You think you're "pro"s, yet you can't handle amateur writers like
Haskell or Norris. Writing is your specialty (after spamming), but
their simple musings have you all atwitter.
Man up... or, in your case, being cast-iron Progressive ideologues,
transgender up.
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to the majors... or the
minors, or the basement. Slow thinkers like our slow plays.
[]softsofa[]
More opinion from a fat ass who sits on a sofa all day. Although you
don't write anything of consequence, alt least you aren't a spammer.
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
softsofa
2010-07-12 19:44:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
Post by softsofa
[blahblahblah whinewhinewhine]
You spamming disinformation bloggers fancy yourselves to be
journalists. But you're T-ballers trying out in the little-league
world of Usenet. You don't make the cut.
You think you're "pro"s, yet you can't handle amateur writers like
Haskell or Norris. Writing is your specialty (after spamming), but
their simple musings have you all atwitter.
Man up... or, in your case, being cast-iron Progressive ideologues,
transgender up.
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to the majors... or the
minors, or the basement. Slow thinkers like our slow plays.
More opinion
Rightardia opinion good. All other opinion from Cheeta.
Post by Rightardia
from a fat ass
Stop staring at "I" rock-hard, yet shapely, ass.
Post by Rightardia
who sits on a sofa all day.
"I" sit. Rightardia lies.
Post by Rightardia
Although you don't write anything of consequence,
Truth's better.
Post by Rightardia
alt least you aren't a spammer.
Rightardia's got that covered.



[]softsofa[]
Rightardia
2010-07-12 23:19:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by softsofa
Post by Rightardia
Post by softsofa
[blahblahblah whinewhinewhine]
You spamming disinformation bloggers fancy yourselves to be
journalists. But you're T-ballers trying out in the little-league
world of Usenet. You don't make the cut.
You think you're "pro"s, yet you can't handle amateur writers like
Haskell or Norris. Writing is your specialty (after spamming), but
their simple musings have you all atwitter.
Man up... or, in your case, being cast-iron Progressive ideologues,
transgender up.
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to the majors... or the
minors, or the basement. Slow thinkers like our slow plays.
More opinion
Rightardia opinion good. All other opinion from Cheeta.
Post by Rightardia
from a fat ass
Stop staring at "I" rock-hard, yet shapely, ass.
Post by Rightardia
who sits on a sofa all day.
"I" sit. Rightardia lies.
Post by Rightardia
Although you don't write anything of consequence,
Truth's better.
Post by Rightardia
alt least you aren't a spammer.
Rightardia's got that covered.
[]softsofa[]
We can only imagine what you like to do if you have to sit on a soft
sofa all day.
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
Patriot Games
2010-07-10 15:45:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
So?
Post by Rightardia
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks
Where on Google do they provide such stats? (They don't...)

You're LYING, again...
Post by Rightardia
suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Bots? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
As I have PROVEN MANY TIMES you write LIES.
Post by Rightardia
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
Translation: You don't like being reminded that YOU ARE LIAR!

Bwahahahahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
No, the "tactic" HAS BEEN PROVEN BY ME to be EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL!!!

Your Blog Stats are PROOF that once a LIAR is EXPOSED most people will
IGNORE THEM!!!

Sucks, eh?

Hahahahahahahahaha!!!

Remember, the Topic will ALWAYS be YOU and YOUR LIES...

And it WILL NEVER END!!!

Hahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
See above, LIAR.
Post by Rightardia
My blogs ratings improve when there is controversy.
Oops! Caught LYING, again!

Your blog ratings have been DRIVEN INTO THE TOILET!!!

(By me...)
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Are you challenging ME to a swordfight!?!?!

Answer quickly, I need to know if I should bring a sword tomorrow to
your Party.

----------------------------
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

3 Slideshows Added!
Galleries Now With Thumbnails!

Movies updated 5/25/10!
Cartoons updated 7/6/10 (285 New)!

Learn the TRUTH about:
Bob LeChevalier,
Bret Cahill,
Freestyle,
Gandalf Grey,
Iarnrod,
Kevin Cunningham,
Lickin Ass' and Fakin' Names,
Major Debacle,
Michael Coburn,
Mitchel Holman,
Peter Principle,
Ramon Herrera,
Ray Fischer,
Rightardia,
Rod Speed,
RobW,
Sid9,
SilentOtto,
Snakehawk,
Stile4aly,
Tater Gumfries,
Tim Crowley,
Tom Sr...
Rightardia
2010-07-13 02:13:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
It's interesting to see the latest right wing tactics that can be
described as getting in the last word. When a progressive writes an
article on alt.politics or other conference, he or she will certainly
experienced a conservative ad hominum cut n' paste attack.
So?
Post by Rightardia
Looking at some of the stats in alt.politics in Google.com, the number
of these cut 'n paste attacks
Where on Google do they provide such stats? (They don't...)
You're LYING, again...
Post by Rightardia
suggests the GOP is using bots to respond
to progressive posters.
Bots? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
Post by Rightardia
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
As I have PROVEN MANY TIMES you write LIES.
Post by Rightardia
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
Translation: You don't like being reminded that YOU ARE LIAR!
Bwahahahahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
No, the "tactic" HAS BEEN PROVEN BY ME to be EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL!!!
Your Blog Stats are PROOF that once a LIAR is EXPOSED most people will
IGNORE THEM!!!
Sucks, eh?
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!
Remember, the Topic will ALWAYS be YOU and YOUR LIES...
And it WILL NEVER END!!!
Hahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
Conservatives are essentially attacking the person who is posting the
article rather than addressing the information or conclusions in the
actual article.
See above, LIAR.
Post by Rightardia
My blogs ratings improve when there is controversy.
Oops! Caught LYING, again!
Your blog ratings have been DRIVEN INTO THE TOILET!!!
(By me...)
Post by Rightardia
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Are you challenging ME to a swordfight!?!?!
Answer quickly, I need to know if I should bring a sword tomorrow to
your Party.
----------------------------
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
3 Slideshows Added!
Galleries Now With Thumbnails!
Movies updated 5/25/10!
Cartoons updated 7/6/10 (285 New)!
Bob LeChevalier,
Bret Cahill,
Freestyle,
Gandalf Grey,
Iarnrod,
Kevin Cunningham,
Lickin Ass' and Fakin' Names,
Major Debacle,
Michael Coburn,
Mitchel Holman,
Peter Principle,
Ramon Herrera,
Ray Fischer,
Rightardia,
Rod Speed,
RobW,
Sid9,
SilentOtto,
Snakehawk,
Stile4aly,
Tater Gumfries,
Tim Crowley,
Tom Sr...
All those avatars are heroes.

You web site is so noob is doesn't even have a Netcraft rating.

It also has a Netcraft risk rating. Malware perhaps?
--
Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism.
Patriot Games
2010-07-13 22:50:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Where on Google do they provide such stats? (They don't...)
You're LYING, again...
You DUCKED the question thus PROVING you were LYING...
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
As I have PROVEN MANY TIMES you write LIES.
Post by Rightardia
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
Translation: You don't like being reminded that YOU ARE LIAR!
Bwahahahahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
No, the "tactic" HAS BEEN PROVEN BY ME to be EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL!!!
Your Blog Stats are PROOF that once a LIAR is EXPOSED most people will
IGNORE THEM!!!
Sucks, eh?
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!
Remember, the Topic will ALWAYS be YOU and YOUR LIES...
And it WILL NEVER END!!!
Hahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
My blogs ratings improve when there is controversy.
Oops! Caught LYING, again!
Your blog ratings have been DRIVEN INTO THE TOILET!!!
(By me...)
You web site is so noob is doesn't even have a Netcraft rating.
I don't need one, don't even want one...
Post by Rightardia
It also has a Netcraft risk rating. Malware perhaps?
Prove it...

You have 24 hours to PROVE it...


----------------------------
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

3 Slideshows Added!
Galleries Now With Thumbnails!

Movies updated 5/25/10!
Cartoons updated 7/6/10 (285 New)!

Learn the TRUTH about:
Bob LeChevalier,
Bret Cahill,
Brian Wraith,
Cop Welfare,
Curly Surmudgeon,
Freestyle,
Gandalf Grey,
Iarnrod,
Kevin Cunningham,
Kurt Lochner,
Lickin Ass' and Fakin' Names,
Major Debacle,
Michael Coburn,
Mitchel Holman,
Peter Principle,
Ramon Herrera,
Ray Fischer,
Rightardia,
RobW,
Rod Speed,
Roneal,
Sid9,
SilentOtto,
Snakehawk,
Spike Lee,
Stile4aly,
Tater Gumfries,
Tim Crowley,
Tim Howard,
Tom Sr...
Buster Norris
2010-07-14 02:54:34 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:50:41 -0400, Patriot Games
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Where on Google do they provide such stats? (They don't...)
You're LYING, again...
You DUCKED the question thus PROVING you were LYING...
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
As I have PROVEN MANY TIMES you write LIES.
Post by Rightardia
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
Translation: You don't like being reminded that YOU ARE LIAR!
Bwahahahahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
No, the "tactic" HAS BEEN PROVEN BY ME to be EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL!!!
Your Blog Stats are PROOF that once a LIAR is EXPOSED most people will
IGNORE THEM!!!
Sucks, eh?
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!
Remember, the Topic will ALWAYS be YOU and YOUR LIES...
And it WILL NEVER END!!!
Hahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
My blogs ratings improve when there is controversy.
Oops! Caught LYING, again!
Your blog ratings have been DRIVEN INTO THE TOILET!!!
(By me...)
You web site is so noob is doesn't even have a Netcraft rating.
I don't need one, don't even want one...
Post by Rightardia
It also has a Netcraft risk rating. Malware perhaps?
Prove it...
You have 24 hours to PROVE it...
HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You KNOW Eric will run like a little greaser chased buy a
coyote!!!!!!!

Eric has only lies!!!!

Now EVERYBODY knows it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Patriot Games
2010-07-15 20:15:24 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:50:41 -0400, Patriot Games
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Where on Google do they provide such stats? (They don't...)
You're LYING, again...
You DUCKED the question thus PROVING you were LYING...
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
As I have PROVEN MANY TIMES you write LIES.
Post by Rightardia
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
Translation: You don't like being reminded that YOU ARE LIAR!
Bwahahahahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
No, the "tactic" HAS BEEN PROVEN BY ME to be EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL!!!
Your Blog Stats are PROOF that once a LIAR is EXPOSED most people will
IGNORE THEM!!!
Sucks, eh?
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!
Remember, the Topic will ALWAYS be YOU and YOUR LIES...
And it WILL NEVER END!!!
Hahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
My blogs ratings improve when there is controversy.
Oops! Caught LYING, again!
Your blog ratings have been DRIVEN INTO THE TOILET!!!
(By me...)
You web site is so noob is doesn't even have a Netcraft rating.
I don't need one, don't even want one...
Post by Rightardia
It also has a Netcraft risk rating. Malware perhaps?
Prove it...
You have 24 hours to PROVE it...
Your 24 hours are up.

NO PROOF.

YOU LIED.


----------------------------
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

3 Slideshows Added!
Galleries Now With Thumbnails!

Movies updated 5/25/10!
Cartoons updated 7/6/10 (285 New)!

Learn the TRUTH about:
Bob LeChevalier,
Bret Cahill,
Brian Wraith,
Cop Welfare,
Curly Surmudgeon,
Freestyle,
Gandalf Grey,
Iarnrod,
Kevin Cunningham,
Kurt Lochner,
Lickin Ass' and Fakin' Names,
Major Debacle,
Michael Coburn,
Mitchel Holman,
Peter Principle,
Ramon Herrera,
Ray Fischer,
Rightardia,
RobW,
Rod Speed,
Roneal,
Sid9,
SilentOtto,
Snakehawk,
Spike Lee,
Stile4aly,
Tater Gumfries,
Tim Crowley,
Tim Howard,
Tom Sr...
Buster Norris
2010-07-16 03:38:27 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:15:24 -0400, Patriot Games
Post by Buster Norris
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:50:41 -0400, Patriot Games
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Where on Google do they provide such stats? (They don't...)
You're LYING, again...
You DUCKED the question thus PROVING you were LYING...
Post by Rightardia
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Rightardia
Rightardia writes articles on it blog and then posts a summary of the
article with a hyperlink on USENET.
As I have PROVEN MANY TIMES you write LIES.
Post by Rightardia
Ad hominem abuse, which is a form of cyber-bullying, usually involves
insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing
out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are
irrelevant to the opponent's argument.
Translation: You don't like being reminded that YOU ARE LIAR!
Bwahahahahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true
negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to
do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
No, the "tactic" HAS BEEN PROVEN BY ME to be EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL!!!
Your Blog Stats are PROOF that once a LIAR is EXPOSED most people will
IGNORE THEM!!!
Sucks, eh?
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!
Remember, the Topic will ALWAYS be YOU and YOUR LIES...
And it WILL NEVER END!!!
Hahahahahahha!!!
Post by Rightardia
My blogs ratings improve when there is controversy.
Oops! Caught LYING, again!
Your blog ratings have been DRIVEN INTO THE TOILET!!!
(By me...)
You web site is so noob is doesn't even have a Netcraft rating.
I don't need one, don't even want one...
Post by Rightardia
It also has a Netcraft risk rating. Malware perhaps?
Prove it...
You have 24 hours to PROVE it...
Your 24 hours are up.
NO PROOF.
YOU LIED.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...