Discussion:
The Lieberman maneuver
(too old to reply)
Captain Compassion
2006-12-15 21:04:53 UTC
Permalink
The Lieberman maneuver

Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.

By Joe Conason

Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.

Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.

But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Connecticut's Republican Gov. Jodi Rell has the constitutional
authority to name a new senator.

In many ways, Lieberman provides a perfect choice for Bush to replace
John Bolton, the departing ambassador who resigned recently because
the Senate wouldn't confirm him. Nominating a longtime Democrat who
has endorsed many of the Bush administration's foreign policy
positions, especially on the war in Iraq, would give the appearance of
bipartisanship without requiring any real compromise with the
opposition.

Just this week Lieberman joined a congressional delegation to Iraq
that included John McCain, R-Ariz., providing moral support to the
Arizona senator's call for an escalation of the American military
effort. He has repeatedly denounced the "partisanship" of Democrats
who criticize the war and the White House, a favor repaid by Karl Rove
with open Republican support for his reelection campaign this fall.
More broadly, Lieberman shares the world outlook of the Bush White
House concerning not only the Mideast and Israel but also the global
"war on terror," belligerence toward Iran and Syria, and a strict
embargo against Cuba. He is quite comfortable with the GOP's
neoconservative wing, as evidenced by his participation in
organizations such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and
the Committee on the Present Danger.

Although Lieberman vehemently disagrees with the president on the
issue of climate change, his overall perspective wouldn't require any
great adjustment to conform with administration policy. (Indeed,
Lieberman cheerfully submitted to much more challenging adaptations in
2000 when he moved leftward to run as the Democratic vice-presidential
nominee.) He is somewhat less obnoxious personally than Bolton, but
not so very different in substance.

To Bush, however, Lieberman might represent a refreshing change -- if
only because the long nomination struggle over Bolton could end at
last with a resounding victory instead of an infuriating defeat.
Selecting a three-term senator who has made alliances on both sides of
the aisle would ensure a smooth confirmation process. Many Democrats
have mixed feelings about their old colleague these days, and he feels
the same way about many of them. But institutional comity would
require them to vote for him. (And how amusing for the Republicans to
watch their adversaries vote themselves back into the minority with
gritted teeth.)

According to the New York Daily News, Lieberman actually was the
president's first choice for the U.N. post. Thomas DeFrank, the
paper's Washington bureau chief, reported last December that Bush had
offered the job to the Connecticut senator, who thought about it for a
week before saying no. If that is true, then he may be at the top of
the list of nominees, which is said to include U.S. ambassador to Iraq
Zalmay Khalilzad, Undersecretary of State Paula Dobriansky and Jim
Leach, R-Iowa, who lost his congressional seat last month.

Many observers doubt that Lieberman will change his mind now if
offered the U.N. post again, despite perks such as a big apartment in
the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, a chance to live in Manhattan rather than
Washington and a turn on the world stage in the tradition of the late
Daniel Patrick Moynihan. They can't imagine why Lieberman would accept
an appointment that is likely to last for only two years when he can
simply stay in the six-year sinecure that he worked so hard to keep.

Certainly such doubts make sense. The likelihood that Lieberman would
leave the Senate is probably quite small. But if the Republicans
really want to steal the Senate back before the Democrats take over,
they can certainly whisper tempting blandishments into his ear. How
about a nice, million-dollar job with, for instance, the Carlyle
Group?

Or maybe even the ego-boosting prospect of another vice-presidential
nomination in 2008 -- this time on a "bipartisan" ticket with friend
and fellow hawk John McCain?
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
***@NOSPAMverizon.net
Aaron
2006-12-15 21:25:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.

You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.

That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.

Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.

Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.

LOL

-Aaron
Captain Compassion
2006-12-16 02:47:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Liberman wouldn't make a good UN Ambassador?
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
***@NOSPAMverizon.net
Gogarty
2006-12-16 15:29:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Liberman wouldn't make a good UN Ambassador?
I totally agree. The "ambassador" (read "proconsul") to Iraq would be a
far better choice.
Hugh Gibbons
2006-12-17 05:01:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Liberman wouldn't make a good UN Ambassador?
He wouldn't take the job.

_______________________________________________

Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and
truth shall be to them that devise good.

Prov 14:22
Captain Compassion
2006-12-16 03:15:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
***@NOSPAMverizon.net
gaffo
2006-12-16 20:15:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
why is that?

it is your party will all the pedophiles and their protectors.

seems America thinks the opposite of what you do Captain, how else can
you interpret Nov elections?

Perhaps a Republican of good conscience will become a Democrat.

seems Bob Bar is on the right track.

maybe YOU need to think about jumping off your ship's Party Captain.

you are not an American Taliban, so why are you a Republican?
--
Hugh Gibbons
2006-12-17 05:00:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
It would have to be a Democrat of bad conscience.

_______________________________________________

Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and
truth shall be to them that devise good.

Prov 14:22
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-17 16:51:16 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:02 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
Currently the fashion is for Republicans to become something else.
What has brought the GOP to power has been wedge issues. The party
has abandoned many of its core principles and angered much of it's
base on several issues as well as alienating moderates and swing
voters. It could well fragment to some degree. If the Dems can
manage to suppress the extreme left wing, they'll pull swing voters to
their side. By the same token, if the GOP can de-emphasize it's
extreme right wing, they can do the same.

I can't speak for the general public, but I'm getting tired of left
extreme tax and spend socialists expecting government to do everything
and right extreme borrow and spend capitalists expecting us to do
everything for ourselves.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Aaron
2006-12-18 15:15:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
You mean, he'd wake up one morning and say "Gosh, I feel like molesting
children today?"

Or, "Golly, there are too many niggers in America!"

Or, "Gee whiz, I sure would like to start a war...but how to justify
it?"

Not likely, but I suppose it is possible.

Good conscience, though? I think not.

-Aaron
Captain Compassion
2006-12-18 16:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
You mean, he'd wake up one morning and say "Gosh, I feel like molesting
children today?"
Or, "Golly, there are too many niggers in America!"
Or, "Gee whiz, I sure would like to start a war...but how to justify
it?"
Not likely, but I suppose it is possible.
Good conscience, though? I think not.
Perhaps the best way would be a spinal implant.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
***@NOSPAMverizon.net
Aaron
2006-12-18 18:51:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
Perhaps a Democrat of good conscience will become a Republican.
You mean, he'd wake up one morning and say "Gosh, I feel like molesting
children today?"
Or, "Golly, there are too many niggers in America!"
Or, "Gee whiz, I sure would like to start a war...but how to justify
it?"
Not likely, but I suppose it is possible.
Good conscience, though? I think not.
Perhaps the best way would be a spinal implant.
If Democrat + spine = Republican, I'll skip the spine,
thankyouverymuch.

-Aaron
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-19 00:44:00 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:15:01 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
Perhaps the best way would be a spinal implant.
I suspect the French are signed up for all those.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Patriot Games
2006-12-18 14:10:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
We're anxiously waiting to meet you in the streets...
Aaron
2006-12-18 15:21:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Aaron
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Still using scare tactics, I see.
You people haven't changed, or even learned from your mistakes.
That's probably because you still won't admit they were mistakes.
Expect significant civil unrest if anything fishy happens to ruin our
majority. In fact, expect it even if something innocently ruins our
majority.
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
We're anxiously waiting to meet you in the streets...
Of course you are. That's all you ever think about. Must shoot
liberals...must shoot liberals...must shoot liberals...

You know, you should donate all but the 4 brain cells you're using to
science. Maybe there's another conservative who needs the brain you're
not using.

Wait. I've got it!...

LOL

-Aaron
Patriot Games
2006-12-18 16:19:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aaron
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Aaron
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
We're anxiously waiting to meet you in the streets...
Of course you are. That's all you ever think about. Must shoot
liberals...must shoot liberals...must shoot liberals...
Hide and we'll find you.

Run and you'll die tired.

Liberal pussy.
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-19 00:44:56 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:19:25 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Liberal pussy.
Nothing wrong with liberal pussy as long as you're not married to it.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Patriot Games
2006-12-19 15:28:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@comcast.net
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:19:25 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Liberal pussy.
Nothing wrong with liberal pussy as long as you're not married to it.
Point taken!
Jeffrey Turner
2006-12-19 01:20:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Aaron
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Aaron
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
We're anxiously waiting to meet you in the streets...
Of course you are. That's all you ever think about. Must shoot
liberals...must shoot liberals...must shoot liberals...
Hide and we'll find you.
Run and you'll die tired.
Liberal pussy.
I guess you figure it's safer than shooting - ooooh - terrists, chicken.

--Jeff
--
Think of what a world we could build if the power unleashed in war
were applied to constructive tasks! One tenth of the energy that
the various belligerents spent in the World War, a fraction of the
money they exploded in hand grenades and poison gas would suffice
to raise the standard of living in every country and avert the
economic catastrophe of world wide unemployment. We must be prepared
to make the same heroic sacrifices for the cause of peace that we
make ungrudgingly for the cause of war. There is no task that is
more important or closer to my heart. Nothing that I can do or say
will change the structure of the universe. But maybe, by raising my
voice, I can help the greatest of all causes - good will among men
and peace on earth.
--Albert Einstein
Patriot Games
2006-12-19 15:28:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeffrey Turner
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Aaron
Post by Patriot Games
Post by Aaron
Then you'll wish we got our gun laws passed.
We're anxiously waiting to meet you in the streets...
Of course you are. That's all you ever think about. Must shoot
liberals...must shoot liberals...must shoot liberals...
Hide and we'll find you.
Run and you'll die tired.
Liberal pussy.
I guess you figure it's safer than shooting - ooooh - terrists, chicken.
There's a difference?
MiscParts.com
2006-12-15 22:17:41 UTC
Permalink
Wow, if that's true and possible, it would be a masterpiece of a political
move ...
And not that bad for the country too ... don't see anyone who would be
better (or worse (:-))
than Lieberman.

Dammy www.miscparts.com F=R=E=E! 1Gb USB 2.0 Flash Drive
FREE 1 Gb Secure Digital SD Memory Card for MP3 players, PDA, Digital
Cameras, etc.
FREE FireWire PCMCIA/PC Card for Notebooks and Laptops
FREE iPod Nano FM TuneBase
$6 FREE TV on your PC for life with the $6 PCI TV Tuner card
$9 Huge 2 Gb SD Memory card for MP3 players, PDA, Digital Cameras, etc.
$120 Pocket PC with WiFi Internet access ($600 on Amazon.com!)
HUGE 50" PLASMA HIGH-DEF WIDESCREEN TV - Lowest price on Earth!
Save enough to buy a car!!! FREE SHIPPING! NO SALES TAX! Get it by Dec 23!

Plus FREE Shipping (1 day left)
Plus NO SALES TAX! (after rebates/offers)
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Connecticut's Republican Gov. Jodi Rell has the constitutional
authority to name a new senator.
In many ways, Lieberman provides a perfect choice for Bush to replace
John Bolton, the departing ambassador who resigned recently because
the Senate wouldn't confirm him. Nominating a longtime Democrat who
has endorsed many of the Bush administration's foreign policy
positions, especially on the war in Iraq, would give the appearance of
bipartisanship without requiring any real compromise with the
opposition.
Just this week Lieberman joined a congressional delegation to Iraq
that included John McCain, R-Ariz., providing moral support to the
Arizona senator's call for an escalation of the American military
effort. He has repeatedly denounced the "partisanship" of Democrats
who criticize the war and the White House, a favor repaid by Karl Rove
with open Republican support for his reelection campaign this fall.
More broadly, Lieberman shares the world outlook of the Bush White
House concerning not only the Mideast and Israel but also the global
"war on terror," belligerence toward Iran and Syria, and a strict
embargo against Cuba. He is quite comfortable with the GOP's
neoconservative wing, as evidenced by his participation in
organizations such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and
the Committee on the Present Danger.
Although Lieberman vehemently disagrees with the president on the
issue of climate change, his overall perspective wouldn't require any
great adjustment to conform with administration policy. (Indeed,
Lieberman cheerfully submitted to much more challenging adaptations in
2000 when he moved leftward to run as the Democratic vice-presidential
nominee.) He is somewhat less obnoxious personally than Bolton, but
not so very different in substance.
To Bush, however, Lieberman might represent a refreshing change -- if
only because the long nomination struggle over Bolton could end at
last with a resounding victory instead of an infuriating defeat.
Selecting a three-term senator who has made alliances on both sides of
the aisle would ensure a smooth confirmation process. Many Democrats
have mixed feelings about their old colleague these days, and he feels
the same way about many of them. But institutional comity would
require them to vote for him. (And how amusing for the Republicans to
watch their adversaries vote themselves back into the minority with
gritted teeth.)
According to the New York Daily News, Lieberman actually was the
president's first choice for the U.N. post. Thomas DeFrank, the
paper's Washington bureau chief, reported last December that Bush had
offered the job to the Connecticut senator, who thought about it for a
week before saying no. If that is true, then he may be at the top of
the list of nominees, which is said to include U.S. ambassador to Iraq
Zalmay Khalilzad, Undersecretary of State Paula Dobriansky and Jim
Leach, R-Iowa, who lost his congressional seat last month.
Many observers doubt that Lieberman will change his mind now if
offered the U.N. post again, despite perks such as a big apartment in
the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, a chance to live in Manhattan rather than
Washington and a turn on the world stage in the tradition of the late
Daniel Patrick Moynihan. They can't imagine why Lieberman would accept
an appointment that is likely to last for only two years when he can
simply stay in the six-year sinecure that he worked so hard to keep.
Certainly such doubts make sense. The likelihood that Lieberman would
leave the Senate is probably quite small. But if the Republicans
really want to steal the Senate back before the Democrats take over,
they can certainly whisper tempting blandishments into his ear. How
about a nice, million-dollar job with, for instance, the Carlyle
Group?
Or maybe even the ego-boosting prospect of another vice-presidential
nomination in 2008 -- this time on a "bipartisan" ticket with friend
and fellow hawk John McCain?
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
David Johnston
2006-12-15 22:23:36 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Gogarty
2006-12-15 23:02:49 UTC
Permalink
While everyone is yapping about the fragile Democratic majority of one,
threatened by the illness of one senator, they are forgetting the even
more fragile minority of the Republicans. If one of their guys goes down
in a state with a Democratic governor, it's all over.

As for Lieberman, never happen. He just won himself six more years with
seniority and perks intact. He's not going to step down for a suite at
the Waldorf and a job as messenger boy. But then, columnists do have to
have something ready by deadline.
Captain Compassion
2006-12-16 02:51:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Perhaps he would do it to advance the cause of the Zionists? What a
great recess appointment.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
***@NOSPAMverizon.net
MikeC
2006-12-16 03:05:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Perhaps he would do it to advance the cause of the Zionists? What a
great recess appointment.
He'd be a decent enough choice but I doubt he'd do it right now. If he'd
lost in November, sure. But if he did it now he'd likely be replaced in a
couple years anyway, and then what would he do?
David Johnston
2006-12-16 03:09:02 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:51:33 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Perhaps he would do it to advance the cause of the Zionists?
Since it wouldn't "advance the cause of the Zionists" one whit, that
seems pointless.
Jeffrey Turner
2006-12-16 17:25:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Perhaps he would do it to advance the cause of the Zionists? What a
great recess appointment.
Since when wouldn't the Senate confirm one of their own? Not that I see
Lieberman accepting the nomination to a two-year post.

--Jeff
--
All men of conscience or prudence
ply to windward, to maintain their
wars to be defensive.
-Roger Williams
Captain Compassion
2006-12-16 21:31:48 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:25:26 -0500, Jeffrey Turner
Post by Jeffrey Turner
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Perhaps he would do it to advance the cause of the Zionists? What a
great recess appointment.
Since when wouldn't the Senate confirm one of their own? Not that I see
Lieberman accepting the nomination to a two-year post.
Would the Democrats appoint him if it meant losing control of the
senate?
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
***@NOSPAMverizon.net
Jeffrey Turner
2006-12-17 02:35:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:25:26 -0500, Jeffrey Turner
Post by Jeffrey Turner
Post by Captain Compassion
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
By Joe Conason
Dec. 15, 2006 | The sudden illness of Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., shook
Democrats from their post-election bliss by reminding them that their
Senate majority is as narrow as it could possibly be -- and that an
unexpected misfortune could instantly deprive them of power in
Congress' upper chamber.
Although Johnson now appears to be recovering from a brain hemorrhage
that required emergency surgery on Wednesday, the potential shift that
could result from his incapacitation certainly awakened Republicans to
the possibility of regaining lost power. Nowhere are such chances eyed
more keenly than in the White House, where George W. Bush and his
aides face spending his final years as president under investigation
by the Senate as well as the House of Representatives.
But regardless of Sen. Johnson's health, the president may yet be able
to tip the balance. With a single stroke, he could restore control of
the Senate to the Republicans, fill an embarrassing vacancy in his
administration and score bipartisan points -- by appointing Sen. Joe
Lieberman, I-Conn., to serve as the next U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Should Lieberman be nominated and accept that position,
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Perhaps he would do it to advance the cause of the Zionists? What a
great recess appointment.
Since when wouldn't the Senate confirm one of their own? Not that I see
Lieberman accepting the nomination to a two-year post.
Would the Democrats appoint him if it meant losing control of the
senate?
Probably. I think senators think other senators are old enough to
decide for themselves what they want to do. I think senators are more
mature than your average usenet denizen.

--Jeff
--
All men of conscience or prudence
ply to windward, to maintain their
wars to be defensive.
-Roger Williams
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-17 16:23:44 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:35:09 -0500, Jeffrey Turner
Post by Jeffrey Turner
Post by Captain Compassion
Would the Democrats appoint him if it meant losing control of the
senate?
Probably. I think senators think other senators are old enough to
decide for themselves what they want to do. I think senators are more
mature than your average usenet denizen.
Considering your answer to the question, I'd say you're right about
that last.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Patriot Games
2006-12-18 14:11:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Because his elected political career is almost finished. So, the next
logical step for him is to persue an appointed political career.
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-19 00:43:10 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:11:55 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Because his elected political career is almost finished. So, the next
logical step for him is to persue an appointed political career.
How do you figure his political career is almost finished? He took
half the votes cast running against four other candidates including a
Republican and the Democrats' primary sanctioned candidate.
Connecticut clearly re-elected Lieberman by a comfortable margin, but
his primary loss and his Dem opponent picking up 40% of the vote
should have taught him that no matter what he personally thinks, his
constituents will not tolerate a pro war position.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Patriot Games
2006-12-19 15:33:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@comcast.net
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:11:55 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Because his elected political career is almost finished. So, the next
logical step for him is to persue an appointed political career.
How do you figure his political career is almost finished? He took
half the votes cast running against four other candidates including a
Republican and the Democrats' primary sanctioned candidate.
Connecticut clearly re-elected Lieberman by a comfortable margin, but
his primary loss and his Dem opponent picking up 40% of the vote
should have taught him that no matter what he personally thinks, his
constituents will not tolerate a pro war position.
The Socialist Dems rejected him as not Socialist enough and the conservative
Republicans don't really support him. He won because (apparently) a lot of
folks disliked the Socialist Dem more.

That could change in a heartbeat! A barely likable closer-to-center Dem
would probably the next election.

To me, Leiberman is probably one of the last few true Democrats. I almost
like the guy. But I don't think he can pull off another election win.

Alternatively, many Dems would have a problem removing him from an appointed
position simply because he has a long career as a Dem.
David Johnston
2006-12-19 01:13:57 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:11:55 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Because his elected political career is almost finished.
He just got re-elected. There's no real reason to think he can't get
elected again.
Patriot Games
2006-12-19 15:36:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@comcast.net
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:11:55 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Because his elected political career is almost finished.
He just got re-elected. There's no real reason to think he can't get
elected again.
Sure there is. Who elected him? The Socialist Dems didn't. The
conservative Republican didn't.

Now, maybe there is a sea change happenning in grassroots politics up there.
Maybe the moderate Dems are rebelling against the ultra-Left Socialists. It
could happen. And maybe the near-center Republicans are more willing to
accept a 'normal' Dem. It could happen.
David Johnston
2006-12-19 16:15:13 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by g***@comcast.net
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:11:55 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:53 -0800, Captain Compassion
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Which is an absurd idea. Why would he want to lose the power and
autonomy he currently has and accept such a demotion?
Because his elected political career is almost finished.
He just got re-elected. There's no real reason to think he can't get
elected again.
Sure there is. Who elected him? The Socialist Dems didn't. The
conservative Republican didn't.
Now, maybe there is a sea change happenning in grassroots politics up there.
Maybe the moderate Dems are rebelling against the ultra-Left Socialists.
You don't have the vaguest comprehension what an ultra-Left Socialist
is. But all you are saying is the obvious, that there still no real
reason to think he can't get elected again.
Patriot Games
2006-12-19 18:12:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Sure there is. Who elected him? The Socialist Dems didn't. The
conservative Republican didn't.
Now, maybe there is a sea change happenning in grassroots politics up there.
Maybe the moderate Dems are rebelling against the ultra-Left Socialists.
You don't have the vaguest comprehension what an ultra-Left Socialist
is.
Nancy "Hairy Legs" Pelosi. (As an example.)
Post by David Johnston
But all you are saying is the obvious, that there still no real
reason to think he can't get elected again.
Don't count on it.

In fact, don't even count on him wanting to do it again.
David Johnston
2006-12-20 09:50:57 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:12:07 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Sure there is. Who elected him? The Socialist Dems didn't. The
conservative Republican didn't.
Now, maybe there is a sea change happenning in grassroots politics up there.
Maybe the moderate Dems are rebelling against the ultra-Left Socialists.
You don't have the vaguest comprehension what an ultra-Left Socialist
is.
Nancy "Hairy Legs" Pelosi. (As an example.)
A false one.
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-20 06:06:19 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Sure there is. Who elected him? The Socialist Dems didn't. The
conservative Republican didn't.
Now, maybe there is a sea change happenning in grassroots politics up there.
Maybe the moderate Dems are rebelling against the ultra-Left Socialists. It
could happen. And maybe the near-center Republicans are more willing to
accept a 'normal' Dem. It could happen.
Since the Republican took 10% of the vote and the Dem 40% leaving
Lieberman with 50%, I'd say Joe did much better with GOP voters than
with Dem ones. After all, it was Dem voters who cost him his primary.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Patriot Games
2006-12-20 18:37:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Since the Republican took 10% of the vote and the Dem 40% leaving
Lieberman with 50%, I'd say Joe did much better with GOP voters than
with Dem ones. After all, it was Dem voters who cost him his primary.
If those are the correct stats then I agree. But this was a fluke. I
wouldn't count on it repeating.
David Johnston
2006-12-20 22:27:03 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:37:04 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Since the Republican took 10% of the vote and the Dem 40% leaving
Lieberman with 50%, I'd say Joe did much better with GOP voters than
with Dem ones. After all, it was Dem voters who cost him his primary.
If those are the correct stats then I agree. But this was a fluke. I
wouldn't count on it repeating.
Why not?
Patriot Games
2006-12-20 23:22:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:37:04 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Since the Republican took 10% of the vote and the Dem 40% leaving
Lieberman with 50%, I'd say Joe did much better with GOP voters than
with Dem ones. After all, it was Dem voters who cost him his primary.
If those are the correct stats then I agree. But this was a fluke. I
wouldn't count on it repeating.
Why not?
Its a good guess that the Dems won't take him back... Running as an
Independent is almost always the kiss of death. No real money, no big
machine backing, etc.

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he won. I almost like the guy and he might be
one of the last true Democrats left in America.

But it was a fluke.
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-21 06:06:53 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:37:04 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:38 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Since the Republican took 10% of the vote and the Dem 40% leaving
Lieberman with 50%, I'd say Joe did much better with GOP voters than
with Dem ones. After all, it was Dem voters who cost him his primary.
If those are the correct stats then I agree. But this was a fluke. I
wouldn't count on it repeating.
They're correct.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/

I'm sure Joe will watch his polls carefully. Wouldn't surprise me to
see him jump parties at some time in the future.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Topaz
2006-12-16 17:38:27 UTC
Permalink
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
America is a Jew-ocracy that is run for the Jews, by the Jews, and of
the Jews, because America is a Jewish owned corporation, not a
"democracy." Votes don't matter much here in the USA because
Washington runs on money, not on votes, and Democratic presidential
candidate Senator Hillary Clinton is just as sold out to the Israeli
lobby, AIPAC (the America Israel Public Affairs Committee), as
Republican presidential candidate Senator Bill Frist. Former
president Bill Clinton was sold out, Jimmy Carter was sold out and
later admitted it after he left office, Ronald Reagan was sold out,
all American presidents were sold out going back to JFK…
All our Middle East problems, our vast national debt, our collapsing
economy, and our collapsing standard of living are all directly the
result of our blind support for Israel's illegal ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians from Palestine. Bush used Israeli torture techniques on
Moslems, our leaders have let Israeli agents here in the USA illegally
spy on American citizens, we ignore UN Resolutions that tell Israel
to go retreat to their 1967 borders as international law mandates. We
routinely block the United Nations from taking action against Israel's
illegal activities. We gave Israel plutonium and helped them build
their atomic and hydrogen bombs, we shoveled Israel over 140 billion
in foreign aid since 1950, and we have wasted 3 to 4 trillion dollars
in total on the cult of Zionism since 1950 through the cost of illegal
wars, oil embargoes, foreign aid, and the cost of the strategic oil
reserve. Frankly, the Jews are bleeding America dry and no one is
courageous enough to stand up to the Jews because Jews in America are
the exact equivalent of George Orwell's BIG BROTHER. Jews tell us all
what to do, what we are allowed to think, and what we are allowed to
speak. Jews control our government, dominate our media, and crush any
opposition by slandering those with legitimate and provable complaints
as "anti-Semites."
It must be great to be above criticism and to control the stupid and
dull Christian masses and laugh at them behind their backs and even to
their faces and get no response other than more feet licking, bowing,
and kow towing. George Bush is a useful idiot, a water carrier for
the Jews just as Hillary Clinton will be if elected president. Both
Iraq wars were started for the Jews and by the Jews. All our
politicians are a disgrace and we will never regain our sovereignty,
solve our foreign policy problems, or balance our budget until we end
our slavish allegiance to the immoral, racist, murdering, torturing,
lying, stealing, manipulating cult nation of Israel.
The Holocaust business feeds the Zionist cult and Hollywood has
deified Jews while vilifying Moslems… Our nation is a lying,
hypocritical mess and the world hates us because the world knows we
are a nation of morons run by Jews. Where are the brave and honest
Americans who speak with one face, not two? Americans are defeated,
weak, foolish, and can't even speak out because they are scared like
little girls, unable to even speak the word "Jew" unless in praise or
on bended knees. Imagine if Catholics or Moonies or the Mafia had that
much control in America! Jews are not above the law and Jews can be
opposed for their real world crimes just like anyone else. Our brains
are frozen by decades of media programming and propaganda so that now
we cannot even speak the "J word." Political correctness, which was
invented by Jews as a form of mind control, prevents Americans from
being fully human. We are a nation of slaves, licking Jewish feet day
after day and we never get tired of it. It's a sad and pathetic
situation and we are a sad and pathetic people who deserve the
contempt of the world because we have no backbone and no honesty.
The United Kingdom is little better than the USA because Tony Blair is
a rabid Christian Zionist himself and most of his top advisors are
Jews. Much of Europe is sold out and controlled by Jews and the cult
of Zionism has Western leaders by the testicles, frozen and unable to
fight back. Now is the time to speak up, to fight back, and to do it
legally, responsibly, and effectively. Just decide that from now on
Jews have no special privileges in your brain and that you can
criticize Jews just like Republicans, Democrats, Catholics, Moonies,
or any other group. Jews act as a 90% unified group, commit crimes as
a 90% unified group, and control America as a 90% unified group, and
thus deserve to be criticized as a 90% unified group. Being able to
criticize those who do harm is what democracy means and is exactly
what freedom of thought means. Become a fully functioning human being
and not just another mind controlled blob of useless DNA!"
inkyblacks

http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/
David Johnston
2006-12-16 20:44:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
<sniff> Anyone smell crazy?
Topaz
2006-12-17 15:05:43 UTC
Permalink
by Kevin MacDonald

The current situation in the United States is really an awesome
display of Jewish power and influence. People who are very strongly
identified as Jews maintain close ties to Israeli politicians and
military figures and to Jewish activist organizations and pro-Israeli
lobbying groups while occupying influential policy-making positions in
the defense and foreign policy establishment. These same people, as
well as a chorus of other prominent Jews, have routine access to the
most prestigious media outlets in the United States. People who
criticize Israel are routinely vilified and subjected to professional
abuse.
Perhaps the most telling feature of this entire state of affairs is
the surreal fact that in this entire discourse Jewish identity is not
mentioned. When Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Michael Rubin,
William Safire, Robert Satloff, or the legions of other prominent
media figures write their reflexively pro-Israel pieces in the New
York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Los Angeles Times, or
opine on the Fox News Network, there is never any mention that they
are Jewish Americans who have an intense ethnic interest in Israel.
When Richard Perle authors a report for an Israeli think tank; is on
the board of directors of an Israeli newspaper; maintains close
personal ties with prominent Israelis, especially those associated
with the Likud Party; has worked for an Israeli defense company; and,
according to credible reports, was discovered by the FBI passing
classified information to Israel - when, despite all of this, he is a
central figure in the network of those pushing for wars to rearrange
the entire politics of the Middle East in Israel's favor, and with
nary a soul having the courage to mention the obvious overriding
Jewish loyalty apparent in Perle's actions, that is indeed a
breathtaking display of power.
One must contemplate the fact that American Jews have managed to
maintain unquestioned support for Israel over the last thirty-seven
years, despite Israel's seizing land and engaging in a brutal
suppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories - an
occupation that will most likely end with expulsion or complete
subjugation, degradation, and apartheid. During the same period Jewish
organizations in America have been a principal force - in my view the
main force - for transforming America into a state dedicated to
suppressing ethnic identification among Europeans, for encouraging
massive multiethnic immigration into the U.S., and for erecting a
legal system and cultural ideology that is obsessively sensitive to
the complaints and interests of non-European ethnic minorities - the
culture of the Holocaust. All this is done without a whisper of
double standards in the aboveground media...


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-17 16:53:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by Topaz
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
<sniff> Anyone smell crazy?
Maybe if we all fart we can cover up the stench.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Topaz
2006-12-19 00:30:46 UTC
Permalink
Today it is taught in the schools that "Anti-Semitism" began in
Germany in the 1930s after which they were deported. What is not
studied is the fact that at one time or other the Jews have been
expelled from every nation in Europe! When the Jews first began to
immigrate to America the early colonialists in New York, Charleston
and Savannah tried to ban their entry. Benjamin Franklin pleaded with
the members of the Continental Congress to enter a specific ban
against Jewish immigration into the U. S. Constitution to bar them for
all time to come.
The Jews claim that they are "only" a religion. The truth is that the
Jews are a RACE. Less than 30% are members of any Synagogue. Whether
they are Orthodox religious, atheists, capitalists or communists -
they still claim to be Jews - members of the Jewish race! Every race
has inherited traits. In the case of the Jews they include trading,
money-changing, usury, and a loathing for "productive labor" which is
scorned as beneath the dignity of the Jews in their "bible" called
"THE TALMUD."
The Jews have not changed since the days when Jesus Christ took up a
whip and drove "the money changers out of the Temple." Jews have
always united to form monopolies. Today they control all the
department store chains and specialty shops along with the lucrative
jewelry and animal fur trade. Jews dominate the fields of all precious
metals such as gold, silver, platinum, tin, lead, etc. They will
always ban together to drive Gentile competitors out of business.
Today America is being flooded with Jewish immigrants from Russia and
even 20,000 per year leave Israel for the U. S. - all with dollar
signs in their eyes. Jews have used their vaunted money-power to seize
control of the Democratic Party and constitute over 50% of all its
financial contributions. Today they are buying up more and more major
U.S. companies. While only 3% of the population, the Jews control over
25% of the nation's wealth and this percentage rises every year. They
are the only racial group totally organized to work for political
domination over America.
Opposition to the Jews did not begin in Germany but dates back before
the birth of Christ over 2,000 years ago! Study the statements made by
"The world's greatest men." They reveal why the "wandering Jews" have
made enemies out of every host country that ever accepted them.
CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman statesman,
writer.
"Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have
already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman.
I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills." (Oration
in Defense of Flaccus)

Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman
official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their
international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself
certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to
"speak softly" shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously
powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote:
"The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous
this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise
through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers."
SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher.
"The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength
that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have
given laws to the conquerors." (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage
Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as
the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form:
"The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh
of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and
daubed themselves with their blood... In all, 220,000 men perished in
Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot
in Cyprus today." (Roman History)

DIODORUS SICULUS. First century Greek historian. Observed that Jews
treated other people as enemies and inferiors.
"Usury" is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates.
This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles.
It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!

BERNARDINO OF FELTRO. 15th century Italian priest. A mild man who
extolled patience and charity in normal circumstances, he described
himself as a "barking dog" when dealing with Jews:
"Jewish usurers bleed the poor to death and grow fat on their
substance, and I who live on alms, who feed on the bread of the poor,
shall I then be mute before outraged charity? Dogs bark to protect
those who feed them, and I, who am feed by the poor, shall I see them
robbed of what belongs to them and keep silent?" (E. Flornoy, Le
Bienbeureux Bernardin the Feltre)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his
"On the Governance of the Jews," he wrote:
"The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from
others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so
that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but
becoming avaricious."

HILAIARE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9
"There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance.
There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and
in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel,
quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to
monopoly is spreading like a disease."

H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937
"The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many
criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the
Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of
South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold;
Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses
controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably
pollute."

W HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919
"The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not
a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does
not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the
antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation,
if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?"

POPE CLEMENT VIII
"All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies
and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of
poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very
poor.
Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they
were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the
Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as
well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in
whatever country they happen to live."

NESTA WEBSTER, In World Revolution, The Plot against Civilization,
page
163
"Since the earliest times it is as the exploiter that the Jew has been
known amongst his fellow men of all races and creeds. Moreover, he has
persistently shown himself ungrateful... The Jews have always formed a
rebellious element in every state."

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary's Are These
Things So?, page 278
"The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling
will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a
question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic
disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever."

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, VIII:44
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye
will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. - then
answered the Jews - "
(which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)
MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William
Hazlet, page 43
"But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though
overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious
race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a
prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand
from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against
them."

REV. GORDON WINROD, in his book The Keys to Christian Understanding,
pages 114 - 115
"Judaism does not know Jesus Christ. Judaism hates Jesus Christ. When
St. Paul was in Judaism, before he was converted to Christianity, he
hated Jesus Christ and persecuted Christians and Christianity."
Paul said: "You have heard of my earlier career in Judaism - how
furiously I persecuted the Church of God, and made havoc of it; and
how in devotion to Judaism I out-stripped many men of may own age
among my people, being far more zealous than they for the tradition of
my forefathers." (Gal. 1:13, 14, Weymouth Translation)
While in Judaism, Paul persecuted Christians because of his intense
hatred for Christians and because of his conformity to the tradition
of the fathers. This shows that the tradition of teachings of Judaism
are filled with hate for Christians.
Few people know of this because they do not carefully read their
Scriptures and because of the great pains which Jews have take to
deceive the Christians. Care has been exerted by the Jews to hide
their ECONOMIC-POLITICAL conspiracy for complete world domination
UNDER high sounding words that have a "RELIGIOUS" ring in the ears of
Christians. The Jews use such "religious" sounding words as "the
Jewish faith," "the Jewish religion," "Jewish spiritual values,"
"Jewish religious doctrines," and like phrases which deceive and lead
the unlearned into total equanimity.
Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world
government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this
world, and the destruction of Christianity.
REV. WILLIAM S. MITCHELL of Philadelphia, quoted in Count
Cherep-Spiridovich's book The Secret World Government, page 194
"If there is an ingrate in history, it is the Jew. In this land which
befriended him he as conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted and
corrupted and (hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of other
folks), dares to contrive and scheme the death of every Christian
principle which has protected him."

ST. JUSTIN, martyr stated in 116 A. D.
"The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They
wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the
Christian faith."

ST. JOHN, Gospel of St. John VII:1
"After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in
Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him."

M. DE HEEKELINGEN, in Israel: Son Passe, Son Avenir
"The former Rabbi Drach, converted to Catholicism, says that the
Talmud contains "a large number of musing, utterly ridiculous
extravagancies, most revolting indecencies, and, above all, the most
horrible blasphemies against everything which the Christian religion
holds most sacred and most dear."
"In the matter of the translation of the Talmud by non-Jews, we
have always preferred that of Luzsensky, whose accuracy has been
established by the Courts. In 1923, the Public Prosecutor of Hungary
caused his Hungarian Talmud to be seized on account of "attack on
public morals" and "pornography." In delivering its verdict, the Court
declared 'INTER ALIA:'
"The horrors contained in the translation of Alfred Luzsensky are to
be found, without exception, in the Talmud. His translation is
correct, in that it renders these passages, which are actually to be
found in the original text of the Talmud, after their true meaning."
QUINTAS SPETIMUS FLORENS TERTULLIAN (160 - 230 A. D.) Latin Church
Father "The Jews formed the breeding ground of all anti-Christian
actions."

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death,
February, 1546

"Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much
harm... You should know the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our
Savior day for day... for that reason you, Milords and men of
authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public
enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our
Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they
give the epithet of changelings and abortions.
Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly
blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our
health, our honor and belongings."

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 - 1789)
"Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to
remain here without my written permission. I know of no other
troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished
the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all
deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be
removed and excluded from here as much as possible."


(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that "The Talmud is the real
"bible" of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This
volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred
for Christ and all Christians. Read "THE TALMUD UNMASKED" for the full
shocking details.)
DIDEROT, DENIS. 18th century French scholar. His famous ENCYCLOPEDIE,
the bible of the pre-revolutionary French "enlightenment," has often
been complained of by Jewish writers as 'anti-Semitic.' Some of
Diderot's other writings are likewise unfriendly:
"And you, angry and brutish people, vile and vulgar men, slaves worthy
of the yoke [Talmudism] which you bear ... Go, take back your books
and remove yourselves from me. (LA MOISADE)
[The Talmud] taught the Jews to steal the goods of Christians, to
regard them as savage beasts, to push them over the precipice ... to
kill them with impunity and to utter every morning the most horrible
imprecations against them. (JUIFS)

NASTA WEBSTER, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, page 370
"The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must
eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical
Judaism... The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud
rather than on the Bible."

F TROCASE, in Jewish Austria
"No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world,
throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has
given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been
unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not
Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian
Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary
energy."

COUNT HELMUTH VON MOLTKE, Prussian general
"The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade those
of their host country.
The Jews always consider an oath regarding a Christian not binding.
During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they were paid by
both sides, they betrayed both sides."

MOHAMMED, in the Koran
"Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them,
God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from
divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up
Jewish deceit."

BACON, FRANCIS. 16th century British writer, politician. In his The
New
Atlantis, he remarked that Jews
"hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancor against
the people among whom they live."
He also disapproved of non-Jewish usurers as "Judaizers" who would
wear "tawny bonnets" like Jews.
LUTHER, MARTIN. 16th century German religious reformer.
"They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted
and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without
ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing,
longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some
day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the
heathen in Persia at the time of Esther... On how they love the book
of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful
and murderous desire and hope. (1)
The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people
as they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and
think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost
undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay
and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first
demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they
only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck
on their snouts...
Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no
people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will
remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed
usury. They also find comfort with this: "When the Messiah comes, He
shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it
among the Jews. (2) Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their
insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so.
Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have
no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real
Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them
who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are
surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore,
they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and
mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee and the like. Of course they
deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready
will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into
deeds, in secret or openly. (3)
A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at
enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no
reason, since we only do good to them.
They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and
highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and
have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest,
steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and
their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with
their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as
foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us; and what they have
certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from
us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money
and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in
exile!
If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the
highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold
through his usury is dearer than God himself!
Do not their TALMUD and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a
Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel?
It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to
steal and rob (as they do with their money lending) from a heathen, is
a divine service... And they are the masters of the world and we are
their servants - yea, their cattle!
I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be
found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than
ever could come into the hearts of the Jews...
Should someone think I am saying too much - I am saying much too
little! For I see in [their] writings how they curse us Goyim and wish
as all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money
through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of
mean tricks... No heathen has done such things and none would to so
except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses - as he possesses
the Jews.
Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of
God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in
their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also
writes) and from that draws the conclusion that they must not be the
people of God.
Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about
being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1,400 years
ago during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted
by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this
day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them
from Jerusalem!... Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like
to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who
must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I
have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever
they would like to have with them.
Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish
people?... Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like
France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what
they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled
them from their country;. For as heard before, God's wrath is so great
over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked,
through hard treatment, however, only a little better. Therefore, away
with them!
How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire
Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be
slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich
and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their
audacity!
What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels, and
cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her
little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God. (From THE JEWS AND
THEIR LIES)
Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too
rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that
I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far
too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain to
do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a
god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself.
Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would
maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews
as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and
malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been
dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such
folk."

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton &
Co.
"They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's
armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and
the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that
each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and
the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."


This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a "CHIT CHAT AROUND
THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION," at the Philadelphia Constitutional
Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina.
"I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this
young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The
menace, gentlemen, is the Jews.
In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have
lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have
segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at
and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation
is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state
within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country
to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.
For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in
that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call
Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple,
they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because
they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot
live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other
people not of their race.
If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their
Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in
such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and
change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our
blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty.
If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants
will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they
will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you,
gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will
curse you in your graves.
Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor
how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be
otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not
even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change
its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if
permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional
Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America.
"The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but
learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading
with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates,
as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry
also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a
charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak
newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to
require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously
in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of
your worships, that the deceitful race - such hateful enemies and
blasphemers of the name of Christ - not be allowed further to infect
and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the
Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.)
The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews
in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding
the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see
ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by "their worships" for
over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view
of the usual Jewish contention that their people were 'poor and
persecuted:' "and also because of the large amount of capital which
they have invested in shares of this Company." (Harry Golden and
Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY)
THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees
ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the
colony without authorization "use their endeavors that the said Jews
may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only
satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity
offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty's Charter." (C. Jones,
HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)
JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 18th century American statesman.
"Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the
land they live in. " (D. Boorstin, THE AMERICANS)
"Those who labor in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he
had a chosen people. " (NOTES ON VIRGINIA)

BEAMISH, HENRY H. 20th century British publisher.
"There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must
face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was
here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you were
then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat - that is their
reward. " (New York speech, October 30, 1937)

HARRINGTON, LORD. 19th century British statesman. Opposed admission of
Jewish immigrants to England because:
"They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world...
The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under
heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the
greatest enemies of freedom. (Speech in the House of Lords, July 12,
1858)

WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO,
March 19. 1925)
"Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews are International.
Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English,
but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever
had to face."

WORLD FAMOUS MEN of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism.
This charge is well founded. The Communist philosophy was drawn up by
Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of
anti-Christian thought is outlined in the Jewish "TALMUD" which is the
"bible" of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the
Christian Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the
Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist
Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but
had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was part Jewish
and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were
Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker
in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank
of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the
Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the "NEW YORK
JOURNAL-AMERICAN" of February 3, 1949.)
CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician. In 1920, he wrote
a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia.
After praising what he called the "national Jews" of Russia, he said:
"In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the
schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister
confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of
countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if
not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and
divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This
movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of
Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky
(Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma
Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for
the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on
the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and
impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern
writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in
the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of
the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people
by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed
masters of the enormous empire.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of
Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution
by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is
certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With
the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures
are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes
from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet institutions the predominance
of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the
principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary
Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews,
and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was
obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun
ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany
(especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey
upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all
these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst
of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in
proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.
("Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish
People." ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

BAKUNYIN, MIKHYL. 19th century Russian revolutionary.
"Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less
intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are
everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians,
correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary
brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank
and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon
the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you
can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it.
Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a
people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive
inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem
strange. What could there be in common between communism and high
finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state
centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a
state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish
nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always
find the means for its existence...
In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under
which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected
with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political
differences as well - this Jewish world is today largely at the
disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the
Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand,
women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work
and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in
the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for
profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be
attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations
of the national banks... (Pollmique contras les Jiffs)
This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those
who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship
with capitalist financiers - overwhelmingly Jewish - since the
revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described
"Bolshevik banker" who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the
revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in
the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion-dollar trade
concessions with the now supposedly 'anti-Semitic' commissars.
WILHELM II. German Kaiser.
"A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad
insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief
- even by pogroms, if necessary.
The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I
was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret
the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers." (CHICAGO TRIBUNE,
July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B'nai B'rith Messenger,
January 28, 1949

"The troublemakers in Hungary are the Jews... they demoralize our
country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is
torturing Hungary."

ADRIEN ARCAND, New York speech, October 30, 1937
"When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews
Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Aza1a and
Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen
other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews;
in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias
Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism
brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish
instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain
and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and
Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top - And this
is no hazard."

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.'s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937
"The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and
direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not
know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say
that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our
deplorable press."

A HOMER, writes in Judaism and Bolshevism, page 7
"History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a
revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second
century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements
in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the
States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far-seeing members
of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political
advantage coincident with such upheavals."

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY SCHYLER, American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in
a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col.
Barrows
in Vladivostok
"It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the
Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and
controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the
United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our
civilization without having the least understanding of what we really
mean by liberty."

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December
15,
1923
"The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by
them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They
are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic
feeling which is increasing."

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10
"B'nai B'rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843,
awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning
"Sons of the Covenant," suggests that the 12 men who organized the
fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of "the Covenant,"
or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To
rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a
world federation or world government - which is the avowed aim of both
Communists and Zionists."

VLADIMIR, LENIN, Founder of Bolshevik Communist (From an article in
Northern Pravda, October-December 1913, quoted in Lenin on the Jewish
Question, page 10)
"There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture
have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its
responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage
of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher
than the percentage of Jews in the general population.)
...Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist
organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other
workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the
creation of an international culture of the working class movement,
are continuing the best traditions of Jewry."

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made
by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316)
"Anti-Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track
which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the
jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but
be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti-Semitism. In the
U.S.S.R., anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile
to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active
anti-Semites are punished with death."

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921
"Jews have always controlled the business... The motion picture
influence of the United States and Canada... is exclusively under the
control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public
mind."

M OUDENDYK, the Netherlands' Minister to Petrograd on September 6,
1918, to the British Government, published in the unexpurgated edition
of A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, April, 1919
"...I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the
greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is
till raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the
bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over
Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who
have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own
ends the existing order of things."

A N. FIELD, in Today's Greatest Problem
"Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise
puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for
instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one."

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25
"The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and
Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the
establishment of their future Messianic kingdom."

A N. FIELD, The Truth About the Slump, page 208
"The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great
concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of
Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material
affairs, and side by side with it is the greatest physical
concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the
globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of
the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history...
The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this
power of the purse (Theodor Herzl's "terrible (Jewish) power of the
purse") and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of
destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they
working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that
they are working in unison."

H. BEAMISH, N.Y. speech, 1937
"Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918."

HILARY COTTER, author of Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth About His Real
"Crime," page 6
"Communism and Judaism are one and the same."

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October
30, 1937
"There is nothing else in Communism - a Jewish conspiracy to grab the
whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can
find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for
themselves a "paradise on earth."
Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and
what it means.
It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is - a
Jewish scheme invented by Jews - that it has progressed against all
opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish
dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor,
profiteer and string-puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come
to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the
paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews."
REV. KENNETH GOFF, in STILL 'TIS OUR ANCIENT FOE, page 99 "The
Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was
turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the
hopes of destroying Christian civilization - as well as others. The
testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take
from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of
a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution."

POPES, ROMAN CATHOLIC.
SYLVESTER I. Condemned Jewish anti-Christian activity.
GREGORY I ('The Great'). Protested wholesale circumcision of Christian
slaves by Jewish traders, who monopolized the slave trade in Europe
and the Middle East and were widely suspected of supplying white girls
to Oriental and African buyers.
GREGORY VIII. Forbade Jews to have power over Christians, in a letter
to Alfonso VI of Castile.
GREGORY IX. Condemned the TALMUD as containing "every kind of vileness
and blasphemy against Christian doctrine."
BENEDICT XIII. His Bull on the Jewish issue (1450) declared:
"The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their knowing
the truth."
JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD
burned "everywhere" and established a strict censorship over Jewish
genocidal writings - an order that has never been rescinded and which
presumably is still binding upon Catholics.
PAUL IV. Cum nimis absurdim (1555) promulgated immediately after his
coronation, was a powerful condemnation of Jewish usury. It embodies a
model legal code to curb Jewish power that was recommended to all
communities.
PIUS IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.
PIUS V. Hebraeorum gens (1569) expelled all Jews from the Papal
States.
GREGORY XIII. Declared that Jews
"continue to plot horrible crimes" against Christians "with daily
increasing audacity."
CLEMENT VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.
ALEXANDER VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.
BENEDICT XIV. Quo Primum 1751) denounced Jewish control of commerce
and "systematical despoliation" of the Christian through usury.
PIUS VII. Known generally as an 'anti-Semite' by Jewish writers.
BENEDICT XV. Warned, in 1920, against
"the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the
worst elements of disorder."
This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and
direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United
Nations.
· And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index
Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings
are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.


GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general, politician. While in
command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi,
he became so infuriated at Jewish camp-followers attempting to
penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel
the Jews:
"I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that
can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the
Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and
other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that
I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits
to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from
the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of
all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged
class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any wood yard on the
river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy
cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will
be at military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay
for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate,
paying gold. (Letters to C. P. Wolcott, assistant secretary of war,
Washington, December 17, 1862)
1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade
established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders,
are hereby expelled from the Department.
2. Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by
Post
Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are
furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning
after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement
until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless
furnished with permits from these headquarters.
3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters
for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.
By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant
General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)

The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the
general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the
expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had
pressure brought to bear.
SHERMAN, WILLIAM T. 19th century American soldier. In a letter from
Union-occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote:
"I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and
secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I
have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use - the
purchase of arms and ammunition... Of course, I have respected all
permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new
cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it." (The Sherman Letters)

ROSS, L. F. 19th century American military man. As did Generals
ULYSSES S GRANT and WILLIAM T. SHERMAN, Ross confronted Jewish 'carpet
bagging' cotton traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during
the Civil War. In a letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote:
"The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in the getting
their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to
pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with
safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners
have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no
conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away."

OLMSTED, GREDERICK LAW. 19th century American architect, historian.
"A swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every
Southern town, many of them men of no character, opening cheap
clothing and trinket shops, ruining or driving out of business many of
the old retailers, and engaging in an unlawful trade with the simple
Negroes, which is found very profitable. (The Cotton Kingdom. For
other views on Jewish involvement in exploiting the South, see ULYSSES
S. GRANT and MARK TWAIN.)

TWAIN, MARK (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer.
"In the U.S. cotton states, after the war... the Jew came down in
force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes' wants
on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the
Negro's share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before
long, the whites detested the Jew. (1)
The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not
concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant
stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always
ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop;
the next year he owned the farm - like Joseph. (2)
In the England of John's time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He
gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of
Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons,
Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of
centuries later.
In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his
activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire
from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he
exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else.
The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house.
Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even
to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial
look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, but not for
the other nine.
Protestants have persecuted Catholics - but they did not take their
livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants -
but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I
feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the
world's attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much
older than that event ...
I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large
degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He
made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been
at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.
You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I
read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the
United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that
I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his
figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me
that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews
did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly
of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I
am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly
active in politics. ("Concerning the Jews," Harper's Monthly Magazine,
September 1899)

Twain's opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in
American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric
daughter Clara married - or was married by - the Jewish piano player,
Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain's publishers were given speedy
instructions to delete "Concerning the Jews" from the collected works,
where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury &
Other Stories.
(1) Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators who
pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil War
(which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a
legitimate question whether there was any preplanning for the
wholesale - and retail - economic looting done by mainly Jewish
carpetbaggers after the war. (2) We have cited a host of other writers
on the terrible economic depredation that Jewry visited on the people
of Tsarist Russia.

ERNEST RENAN, French historian
"The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but - and
this is the most important factor - ethnically an altogether different
race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who
immigrated from Asia. The so-called prejudice is natural sentiment.
Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely
professes another religion, but never against the racially different
Jew...
In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh
of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim.
Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief
characteristics; self-sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign
to him."

GOLDWIN SMITH, Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in
Nineteenth Century, October 1881
"The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks
forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph
over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a
tribal Messiah."

MENCKEN, H. L. 20th century American writer.
"The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race
ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities
that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease,
confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without
taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is
wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of
display." (Treatise on the Gods)
The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really
privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent
bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places
of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment
any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place
diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still
nicht gewuenscht ... ("not wanted.")
"I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD.
I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble
work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report
must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few
bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish..."
"The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the
Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the
Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the
first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish
composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no
Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no
Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the
latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein
are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical
fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious.
Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing
that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space
may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But
whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it
must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in
fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he
will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success.
But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability."
(Minority Report: H. L. Mencken's Notebooks)

SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. 20th century British dramatist.
"This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the
ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning
Post, December 3, 1925)
This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration.
The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be
the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine
and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and
start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

WAGNER, RICHARD. 19th century German composer.
"The Jew has never had an art of his own, hence never a live of
art-enabling import... "So long as the separate art of music had a
real organic life-need in it, down to the epochs of Mozart and
Beethoven, there was nowhere to be found a Jew composer: it was
utterly impossible for an element quiet foreign to that living
organism to take a part in the formative stages of that life. Only
when a body's inner death is manifest, do outside elements win the
power of judgment in it - yet merely to destroy it.
On one thing am I clear: that is the influence which the Jews have
gained upon our mental life, as displayed in the deflection and
falsification of our highest culture-tendencies. Whether the downfall
of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of the
destructive alien element, I an unable to decide, since that would
require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted. (Judaism in
Music)

SOMBART, WERNER. 20th century German economist.
"Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the
root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will
find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught
early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money.
They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords
of Money and Lords of the World...

FITZGERALD, F. SCOTT. 20th century American novelist.
"Down a tall busy street he read a dozen Jewish names on a line of
stores; in the door of each stood a dark little man watching the
passers from intent eyes - eyes gleaming with suspicion, with pride,
with clarity, with cupidity, with comprehension. New York - he could
not dissociate it from the slow, upward creep of this people - the
little stores, growing, expanding, consolidating, moving, watched over
with hawks' eyes and a bee's attention to detail - they [were Jews.]

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet.
"The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these
days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

BURTON, SIR RICHARD FRANCIS. 19th century British diplomat, writer.
After a sting as consul at Damascus, Syria, where some years before, a
Catholic priest was allegedly murdered in a blood ritual by Jews,
Burton took an interest in the matter. His investigations satisfied
him that such killings actually were performed by certain sects of
Jews.
"The Jew's hand was ever, like Ishmael's, against every man but those
belonging to the Synagogue. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning,
combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and
with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and
whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and
subjection, combined to make him the deadly enemy of all mankind,
whilst his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law contributed to inflame his
wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and
superstition."

DREISER, THEODORE. 20th century American writer.
"New York to me is a scream - a Kyke's dream of a ghetto. The Lost
Tribe has taken the island. (Letter to H. L. Mencken, November 5,
1922)"

"Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you
listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are money-minded, very
sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is
endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other
nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and
he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he
has not faded into a pure American by any means - and he will not.
(Letter to Hutchins Hapgood, The Nation magazine, April 17, 1935)"

WELLS, H. G. 20th century British writer.
"The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem
mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of
David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm
but benevolent Jewish heel." (The Outline of History)
"Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews
have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen
people." (The Anatomy of Frustration)
"A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be
of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the
irritations they inflict." (Letter of November 11, 1933)
Wells was in the habit of referring to KARL MARX as "a shallow
third-rate Jew," and "a lousy Jew" in private correspondence. (Norman
MacKenzie, H. G. Wells)

LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer.
Wednesday, August 23, 1939

"We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our
press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton]
Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms
threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a
certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was
powerful enough to have the feature removed."
Thursday, May 1, 1941

"The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to
it, but the Administration seems to have 'the bit in its teeth' and is
hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the
country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and
radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the 'intellectuals'
and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British agents who are allowed free
rein, the international financial interests, and many others." (The
Wartime Journals)

GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELY, in the New York Tribune, March 29,
1939
"The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish
influence throughout the world."

HERDER, JOHANN GOTTFRIED. 18th century German philosopher.
"The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to
our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a
distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do
away with...
How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the
true citizen?
A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has
the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a
department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business,
are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained. (Bekehrung der Juden)
For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history,
the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race
of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have cause great evil to
many ill-organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic
development of their indigenous population. ("Hebraer," in Ideen)

BONAPARTE, NAPOLEON. French statesman, general.
"The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to
reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but
selling old clothes..."
"Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general
well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference
on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces
of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are
the carrion birds of humanity... "They must be treated with political
justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens."
"The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed
the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers,
falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from
commerce because they abuse it... The evils of the Jews do not stem
from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people."
(From Napoleon's Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of
State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.)
"Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the
Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of
them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the
most vile nation in the world." (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of
Westphalia, March 6, 1808)
(1) Every big and small Jew in the peddling trade must renew his
license every year.
(2) Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew
can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance
of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)


DE GAULLE, CHARLES. 20th century French politician. Addressing the
Zionist imbroglio in the Mideast in a news conference of November 27,
1967, he observed:
"The Jews remain what they have been at all times: an elite people,
self-confident and domineering."

SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist.
"I saw in 'the wandering Jew' the personification of the Jewish
people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again
extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their
indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend
toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of
making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its
obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some
wise Jews prophesy this frankly." (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857)

COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE. In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in
1790, the city's revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews,
because:
"Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one
doubted they were foreigners... Let the 'enlighteners' stop defaming
the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their
conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up
every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their
nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might them judge
them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la
Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile
on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler
Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany:
"It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany.
The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the
first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless
forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they
obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin,
for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers
were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it
was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts.
The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and
they had made great inroads on the educational system."

FRANCO, FRANCISCO. 20th century Spanish statesman. In his victory
speech in Madrid, on May 19, 1939, he declared:
"Let us be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible
for the alliance of large-scale capital with Marxism and was the
driving force behind so many anti-Spanish revolutionary agreements,
will not be got rid of in a day."

PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer
(assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the instruments of
Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and
that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism
used to smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El Estado Nacional)
H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 - November 1, 1937
"In 1848 the word "anti-Semitic" was invented by the Jews to prevent
the use of the word "Jew." The right word for them is "Jew" ...
"I implore all of you to be accurate - call them Jews. There is no
need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in
this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven
years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free.
No he has got you absolutely by the throat - that is your reward."

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate.
"The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest.
They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the
spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a
national and patriotic duty - not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to
get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let
ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of
these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical
and holy to react against them." (New York Herald Tribune, August 17,
1937)

HOUSTON STEWART CHAMBERLAIN, world famed author of Foundations of the
Nineteenth Century, Vol. I, page 337
"The revelation of Christ has no significance for the Jew! ... I have
searched through a whole library of Jewish books in the expectation of
finding - naturally not belief in the Divinity of Christ, nor the idea
of redemption, but the purely human feeling for the greatness of
suffering Savior - but in vain. A Jew who feels that, is, in fact, no
longer a Jew, but a denier of Judaism. And while we find, even in
Mohammed's Koran, at least a vague conception of the importance of
Christ and profound reverence for His personality, a cultured leading
Jew of the nineteenth century (Graetz) calls Christ "the new birth
with the death mask," which inflicted new and painful wounds upon the
Jewish people; he cannot see anything else in Him. In view of the
Cross he assures us that "the Jews do not require this convulsive
emotion for their spiritual improvement," and adds, "particularly not
among the middle classes of inhabitants of the cities." His
comprehension goes further. In a book, republished in 1880, by a
Spanish Jew (Mose de Leon) Jesus Christ is called a "dead dog" that
lies "buried in a dunghill." Besides, the Jews have taken care to
issue in the latter part of the nineteens century several editions
(naturally in Hebrew) of the so-called "censured passages" from the
Talmud, those passages usually omitted in which Christ is exposed to
our scorn and hatred as a "fool," "sorcerer," "profane person,"
"idolater," "dog," "bastard," "child of lust," etc.: so, too, His
sublime Mother."

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s
"Through their (Jew's) international news agencies, they mold your
minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to
see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth -
and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child's brain
what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the
school."

NESTA WEBSTER, in her book Germany and England
"England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the
invisible Jewish dictatorship - a dictatorship that can be felt in
every sphere of life."

HENRY WALLACE, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman,
wrote in his dairy that in 1946
"Truman was "exasperated" over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist
rule over Palestine. Wallace added "Pres. Truman expressed himself as
being very much 'put out' with the Jews. He said that 'Jesus Christ
couldn't please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone
expect that I would have any luck?' Pres. Truman said he had no use
for them and didn't care what happened to them."

WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYANT, three times the Democratic Party candidate
for President said:
"New York is the city of privilege. Here is the seat of the Invisible
Power represented by the allied forces of finance and industry. This
Invisible Government is reactionary, sinister, unscrupulous,
mercenary, and sordid. It is wanting in national ideals and devoid of
conscience... This kind of government must be scourged and destroyed."

HENRY ADAMS (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John
Hay, October 1895
"The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems."

SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician.
"One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of
America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign
secretary. Letters and Friendships)

CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer. In an interview, he
assailed "the Zionist mafia" monopolizing publishing today, and
protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish
approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)
VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher,
writer.
"Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws;
they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human
race..."
"The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward
all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious,
always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous -
cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity." (Essai sur le
Moeurs)
"You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the
Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and
more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed
all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You
deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny." (From a letter to a
Jew who had written to him, complaining of his 'anti-Semitism.' Examen
des Quelques Objections... dans L'Essai sur le Moeurs.)
"You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who
for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most
detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all
peoples which tolerate and enrich them." ("Juif," Dictionnaire
Philosophique)
"I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These
marranos go wherever there is money to be made... But whether these
circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of
Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are,
simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the
earth." (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December
15, 1773. Correspondence. 86:166)
"They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts,
just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would
not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day
become deadly to the human race." (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)
NH


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/
Jeffrey Turner
2006-12-17 23:56:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by Topaz
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
<sniff> Anyone smell crazy?
Topaz? Usenet's favorite neo-Nazi? Why would anyone suspect insanity?

--Jeff
--
All men of conscience or prudence
ply to windward, to maintain their
wars to be defensive.
-Roger Williams
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-18 14:43:37 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:56:23 -0500, Jeffrey Turner
Post by Jeffrey Turner
Topaz? Usenet's favorite neo-Nazi? Why would anyone suspect insanity?
It's obsession with Jews got it put back in my filters again today.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Topaz
2006-12-19 00:31:54 UTC
Permalink
The Jews Are Our Misfortune
By Dr. William Pierce

If you've been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that
the issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly
every broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the
mass media of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the
opinions and attitudes of about 95 per cent of the population. I have
pointed out
that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in
collusion with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need
most people have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a
perceived norm.

The media bosses use their control over the mass media of
entertainment -- and to a lesser extent over the news media -- to
create an artificial norm that is presented to the public through
television, motion pictures, advertising, and other media, and this
artificial norm is the one perceived as real by most of the public.
Through their control of public opinion the media bosses also control
the democratic political process and governmental policy in a way that
is advantageous to them and disadvantageous to the White public. And
these media bosses are overwhelmingly Jews.

That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many
of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish
media control and have presented different specifics, different
details, in various broadcasts. I've discussed a number of different
Hollywood films or television shows as specific examples of the way in
which the Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to
promote
fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but
that advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and
exploit our society.

(Some of this may be outdated today, but it still explains why things
are the way they are)

I've talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the
mass media, and I've pointed out specific instances of the destructive
way in which they use their control. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Sumner Redstone and his control of MTV and CBS and the
Hollywood film studio Paramount Pictures. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Michael Eisner and his control of the Disney Company and
ABC. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Gerald Levin and his
control of Time Warner and CNN. I've talked about the Jewish media
boss Edgar Bronfman and his control of the largest segment of the
popular music industry and Universal Studios in Hollywood. And I've
talked about dozens of other Jewish media bosses and the media they
control and the specific ways in
which they use those media. In particular, during the past few months
I've talked about several recent Hollywood films which deliberately
target teenaged White girls and brainwash them with the notion that it
is fashionable for them to have sex with Black males.

And of course, I've talked about the Jewish control of the news media
as well as the entertainment media. In a way similar to their use of
the entertainment media to set popular fashions, the Jewish media
bosses distort and censor the news in order to give the public a
distorted picture of what is happening in the world. I've given
several very
specific examples of this Jewish management of the news in recent
months.

I've talked about the total blackout at the national level of the news
of the atrocious rape and massacre of Whites in Wichita, Kansas, by
Blacks last December, and I've talked about the almost total
suppression of the news of the Black racial attacks on Whites in
Seattle in the Mardi Gras riot at the end of February this year. I
also talked about
the downplaying of the racial aspects of the Black rioting in
Cincinnati in April of this year, about the failure of the news media
outside the immediate Cincinnati area to mention the deliberate
targeting of Whites, especially White women, by the Black rioters. And
I described the gross distortions in the news coverage of the racial
politics in York,
Pennsylvania, that led to the current White mayor of York being
charged in May with the killing of a Black during a Black race riot in
York 32 years ago.

I have pointed out repeatedly how all of this suppression of the news
and distortion of the news is aimed at creating and maintaining a
false picture in the public mind of racial conflict in the United
States. In this false picture Whites always are the aggressors, Blacks
or other non-Whites are the innocent victims, and the root of all
racial conflict
is White racism.

In a number of my broadcasts I've discussed at length why the Jews do
what they do: why they use their media control in such a deceptive and
destructive way, what their motives are. I've also talked about how
they collaborate. I've pointed out that their propaganda policies are
not formulated independently, but that they have a coherent party line
that
they all follow. I've given a number of specific examples of this.
Well, all of these things that I've talked about have not gone
unnoticed by the Jewish media bosses themselves. When people expose
their activities or their scheming they pay attention. In particular,
they have been paying attention to these American Dissident Voices
broadcasts and to the work of my organization, the National Alliance.
They read what's on our Web sites at natvan.com and natall.com and
resistance.com, and they talk about it among themselves. This shows up
pretty clearly in the uniform way in which their media respond to us.
Whether it's the Associated Press or Time magazine or the Washington
Post or a television news commentator anywhere in the United States,
they always use the same
phrasing in talking about us. They always use the word "hate" in
referring to us. They always say that the National Alliance is the
"most dangerous organized hate group" in America, despite the fact
that all we do is disseminate to the public the truth about what
they're doing. That's what they regard as "dangerous" and as "hate."

If you want to see a current indicator of the fact that they do think
about us, go to the Web site promoting Steven Spielberg's new
movie,A.I. There you'll see a parody of a part of the National
Alliance's Web site in the form of a page headed "Who Is the
Anti-Robot Militia?" It's obviously copied, almost word for word, from
the page "Who Is the National Alliance?" on our Web site. It's
difficult for me to understand what they hoped to accomplish with this
parody. Perhaps they believe that it will make people take us less
seriously.

Somewhat less quirky but much more directly deceptive are their
standard smokescreen responses. It used to be that whenever I would
raise the issue of Jewish monopoly control of the mass media of news
and entertainment during an interview or on a call-in program, I would
hear the response from a Jew or an apologist for the Jews: "What about
Ted
Turner? He's not a Jew," as if that negated everything I had said. Of
course, that response was used before Ted Turner's CNN was taken over
by the very Jewish Time Warner. And now that Ted Turner has been eased
out of all decision-making positions in the cable news network he
built and has been replaced by Jews, one doesn't hear the Ted Turner
response any longer.

The standard responses today, the ones I hear as often as I used to
hear the Ted Turner response, are the "it's the shareholders" and the
"it's the big bankers." Whenever I start naming names -- whenever I
begin talking about the control over the media wielded by Michael
Eisner or Sumner Redstone, for example, a Jew will pop up with the
response:
"Those guys don't control the media. It's the shareholders who control
the media. Eisner and Redstone are just employees. The shareholders
tell them what to do." A variation on this theme is, "Eisner and
Redstone don't own the media. It's the big banks that own all of the
media, and most of the big bankers are Gentiles."

Well, of course, that's not really true, and they know it's not true.
The big Jewish media bosses are mostly quite autonomous. Sumner
Redstone, for example, owns outright two-thirds of the shares in his
media empire. His personal fortune is more than 12 billion dollars,
according to Forbes magazine this month. I'm quite sure he doesn't
check
with any shareholders before he dreams up some new piece of
race-mixing filth for MTV.

As for Gentile bankers telling the Jewish media bosses what kind of
propaganda they must produce for the public, that's total nonsense. I
haven't yet done a study of the investment banking industry to
determine what percentage of Jews and what percentage of Gentiles are
involved in it, but one thing that's certain is that the Gentile
bankers would faint dead away at the thought of telling Jewish media
bosses such as Michael Eisner or the Sulzberger family or the
Newhouses or Sumner Redstone to cut back on the race-mixing
propaganda. Gentile bankers as a class are rich, deracinated capons,
whose only interest is money.

Every Jewish propaganda medium -- CBS or MTV or Time magazine or the
New York Times -- is staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and they
all know what they're doing. They work as a tribe, as a swarm of
termites gnawing at the foundations of our existence. There is total
agreement among the media Jews as to the general thrust of their
propaganda. They may disagree on many of the details -- they may even
compete against each other for a bigger slice of the media pie -- but
all agree on the general goals of degrading and subverting Gentile
civilization, of corrupting Gentile institutions, of mongrelizing our
race. Again, the Jews work as a tribe, and that is the source of their
strength and their success.

Gentile bankers, on the other hand, work only for themselves. They
would not dream of combining and using their financial strength to
protect our people from the Jews. They are terrified of the Jews, of
the media. The more money they have, the more selfish and the more
cowardly they are. The huge difference, the decisive difference,
between the Jews and our people is that they work as a tribe, and we
work as individuals. They
work together, rich Jews and poor Jews, for their common tribal
interests, against us, and until now we have failed to organize
effectively to defend ourselves against them.

Anyway, my point is that their defense against my exposure of their
activities and their power over our government is orchestrated - that
is, they've all gotten together and decided what their defense will be
-- and it's a deliberate lie. As I continue to expose the destructive
activities of the Jewish media bosses, you will continue to hear them
and their apologists respond that they really don't have any power,
that it's the Gentile shareholders and the Gentile bankers who control
the media. A lot of dimwits will believe that lie. A lot of couch
potatoes, a lot of soccer moms, a lot of baseball fans, a lot of
lemmings, will
believe that it's not the Jew Sumner Redstone who deliberately uses
MTV to corrupt White teenagers; instead it's some cabal of Gentile
shareholders and Gentile bankers who tell him what to do, and Redstone
is only an employee who follows their orders.

I think it's time for us to orchestrate our exposure of the Jewish
media. I think it's about time for the public, lemmings and all, to
begin hearing a uniform charge against them, a uniform statement of
our opposition to them. How about this: The Jews are our misfortune.
That's simple, and it's true, and it's easy to remember. Repeat after
me: The
Jews are our misfortune. Let's use that statement. Let's let everyone
hear it. Let's impress it on everyone's consciousness: The Jews are
our misfortune.

Of course, when I say the Jews are our misfortune, I'm not talking
only about the Jewish media bosses. I'm not talking only about the
Jews at the top, such as Sumner Redstone and the Sulzbergers and
Michael Eisner and the others who formulate and direct the propaganda
line against Gentile society; I'm talking about the whole tribe, and I
believe that message comes across in the statement, the Jews are our
misfortune. Let me tell you what the standard lemming response will be
to that statement, the response that they have been taught and will
parrot back.

First, from the religious lemmings it will be something like this:
"Oh, no, the Jews aren't our misfortune, we owe everything to the
Jews. Don't you know that Jesus was a Jew and God was his father? That
makes God a Jew. We must do what the Jews tell us. They are God's
people." I'm sure that argument is embarrassing to some of the more
sophisticated
apologists for the Jews, but many Christian Fundamentalists use it,
and I've heard it often.

From the secular lemmings it will be more like: "Don't you know that
Freud and Einstein and Salk were Jews? We wouldn't have a space
program if it weren't for Einstein. We wouldn't have a cure for polio
if it weren't for Salk. The Jews are our fortune, not our misfortune."
Well, of course, our space program has practically nothing to do with
Einstein or his Jewishness. Gentile thinkers envisioned it and
pioneered both its theoretical basis and its practical development.
The German theoretician, Hermann Oberth, and the Russian, Konstantin
Tsiolkovsky, were two of the Gentiles who independently demonstrated
mathematically the feasibility of space travel in the early years of
the last century. The American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard and the
German Wernher von Braun designed actual rockets and built the
vehicles which were the precursors of today's space ships. Jews didn't
become involved until it became glamorous and profitable. And the
development of a polio vaccine hardly would have missed a beat if
Jonas Salk had gone into the garment business instead of medicine. He
was one of a team, and he got the credit for the work of others as
well as for his own work.

The reasons we hear these silly and groundless claims in the first
place about how much we owe the Jews -- the reasons are Jewish media
control and Jewish tribalism, Jewish support for their own. Freud was
given the enormous buildup he received for his theorizing about anal
personalities and penis envy and the like because he was a Jew, not
because of any genuine merit in his theorizing. Other Jewish writers
recognized him as one of their own and propelled him to a position of
undeserved authority, and his theories ultimately did an enormous
amount of damage to the development of our understanding of psychology
and mental disease. Einstein was a competent mathematical physicist,
but a great deal of the publicity he received was based on the fact
that he was a Jew rather than on the merits of his work. As in the
case of Salk, Jewish publicists gave Einstein credit for the work of
others as well as for his own work.

What we must do is look at the balance sheet. Is the damage done to
our race by Karl Marx and all of his Jewish followers in the communist
movement -- the selective murder of more than 30 million of the best
of our people in Europe during the past century -- offset by whatever
contributions Einstein and Salk and other Jews have made -- even if
they did everything their Jewish boosters claim for them? Certainly,
there have been many other Jews who were competent and creative
engineers and scientists besides Einstein and Salk. Not every clever
Jew became a lawyer or a scriptwriter or a pawn shop owner or a
middleman. Some became chemists or mathematicians or physicists. But
can all of them together make up for the mass murders Lazar Kaganovich
perpetrated
aginst the Ukrainians, for the rapes and murders of German civilians
instigated by Ilya Ehrenburg, for the Eastern European girls still
being forced into sexual slavery on a huge scale today by Israeli
slave dealers?

I think not. And I have not yet put on the balance sheet what the
Jewish masters of America's mass media have done and are doing to us.
What can possibly compensate White Americans for the deliberate,
malevolent corruption of our young people by just one Jewish gangster
like Sumner Redstone and his MTV? The race-mixing, culture-destroying,
hip-hop filth churned out by Sumner Redstone's MTV seven days a week
is the single most destructive influence in American life today. And
of course, Redstone doesn't produce this filth all by himself. He has
thousands of Jews working for him at every level, not only in MTV but
also in CBS and in Paramount Pictures and in all of his other media
properties.

And although MTV, targeting White teenagers as it does, may seem the
most blatantly and maliciously destructive of the Jewish media, it is
hardly much worse than some of the filth being poured into the minds
of the American public by Michael Eisner's Disney empire: especially
by its Miramax films division under the Weinstein brothers. The fact
that much of the entertainment produced by Eisner's Disney Company is
relatively nnocuous does not compensate for the fact that some of it
is pure poison. The poison is being introduced gradually, more and
more each year, and it is having its effect. When the Disney Company
was entirely a Gentile company a few years ago, its output of
ntertainment may sometimes have been excessively bland, but none of it
was poison designed to corrupt White Americans.

And what can possibly compensate on our balance sheet for what the
Jewish news media are doing in their deliberate, calculated distortion
of the picture of the world seen by the American public. It is a
picture which has been designed to confuse White Americans, to
undermine their self-confidence, to induce feelings of racial guilt in
them. Just one example: the systematic suppression of the news of
Black crimes against White people and the exaggeration of the news of
every White crime against non-Whites is not a fluke. It is done
routinely by all of the Jewish news media: by the New York Times, by
the Washington Post, by Time magazine and Newsweek magazine, by CNN
and ABC News and CBS News and NBC News and all the rest. And
interracial crime is just one issue. The relations between the sexes;
immigration; the foreign relations of the United States with the rest
of the world, especially in the Middle East; and a hundred other
important issues are similarly distorted in their portrayal by the
media. This deliberate distortion of the public's view of the world
has done irreparable damage to the American system of government and
to American society. And again: the distortion has been deliberate,
planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No number of funny
Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley
or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers can compensate
for this harm.

When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any
doubt: the Jews are our misfortune. It's way past time for us to
accept this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled
"anti-Semitic" for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these
fears which have been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass
media, and then to begin working to improve our fortunes.


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/
Patriot Games
2006-12-19 15:37:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
The Jews Are Our Misfortune
Listen, nothing personal, you keep doing whatever you want.

But do you really think anybody reads that mini-novel that you post 25 times
a day?

Just something to think about.
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-20 06:08:05 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:37:55 GMT, "Patriot Games"
Post by Patriot Games
Listen, nothing personal, you keep doing whatever you want.
But do you really think anybody reads that mini-novel that you post 25 times
a day?
I don't think it realizes that at all.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
g***@comcast.net
2006-12-17 16:52:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel.
The anti Jew schtick isn't working, man.

Swill
--
In the 1960s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

In the 2000s a President from Texas fought an unwinnable war
that cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The moral of the story is, No New Texans
Topaz
2006-12-19 00:32:33 UTC
Permalink
by VNN Staff

revised December 2005

Introduction

The text below shows that Jews may well have influenced Western
culture more than any other ethnic group, particularly over the last
few hundred years. It is important to note that our writers allege no
'conspiracy' by Jews. Rather, the examples cited point to an inborn
tendency of Jews to engage in behavior they believe will ensure their
group's safety, no matter its effect on the gentiles they live among.

To be sure, the Jews -- a race and also a religion -- have a long
history. But we will focus here on the past 200 years. We begin their
saga with the rise of the Rothschild banking family in Europe.

The Rise of the Rothschilds and International Banking

Of significance in Jewish history is how important the Rothschilds --
and other Jewish bankers -- were to the solidification of Jewish power
in the West. A large percentage of banks in the West was originally
founded by Jews, e.g. the Rothschilds, Jacob Schiff, and Paul and Max
Warburg. In fact, Meyer Amschel Rothschild and his sons virtually
invented modernized banking and finance. Not only did the powerful
Rothschilds control banking in Europe from approximately 1815 onward,
but they also purchased European news outlets -- including the Reuters
news agency -- giving them the power to influence the opinions of
millions of gentiles. Furthermore, political and social-reform actions
naturally require money; since they were far wealthier than even royal
families -- who were in fact indebted to them -- the Rothschilds were
in a unique position to be able to transform aspects of European
society to benefit the Jewish community.

Two features remain key to the power of the international bankers.
First, many bankers are related by marriage. By the end of the 1800s
many Rothschild cousins had married. Second, many top politicians in
the West have been indebted to the international bankers for providing
them with loans at critical times, such as when a Rothschild loaned
fellow Jew and Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli millions of pounds so
he could buy shares of stock for control of the Suez Canal area to
benefit England.

Perhaps nowhere have Jewish international bankers had a bigger impact
than in funding wars. For example, they funded the Japanese in the
Japan/Russia war of the early 20th century, which has been described
as the first war in which non-Whites defeated White men. Many Western
political observers assert that wars are waged for economic reasons,
and if that is true, then Jews, by their domination of international
banking, have been vital but unseen players in modern warfare.

The Founding of Communism

The ideology that would murder and enslave more people than any other
idea in human history was crafted in the 1840s by a German Jew named
Karl Marx. Like many Jews who wanted to hide within gentile society,
Marx's family converted to Christianity. Marx's ideology was called
communism, a social and economic system in which the government
controlled all forms of property and wealth. Marx based his communism
on the historic kahal, a Jewish communal living system. The kahal was
essentially an early form of communism, with community needs such as
food, living arrangements, and vocations allocated in a collective
manner.

Furthermore, the Soviet Union - which spread communism across the
earth - would likely have never been created if the part-Jewish
leftist V. I. Lenin (see elsewhere) had not been heavily influenced by
Marx's book Das Kapital. In fact, Das Kapital can be credited as
having transformed the young Lenin into a full-blown revolutionary -
another Jewish root of communism.

It should be noted by the reader that communism is, as an ideology,
more severe than Nazism, its sworn enemy. As an example, in Nazi
Germany a citizen could own a gun with a permit. But no citizen could,
or can, own a gun in any communist country. Nazism wasn't
totalitarian. It was politically authoritarian. But communism is
totalitarian in that every aspect of a citizen's life is rigidly
controlled. The number of people murdered by communism worldwide since
1917 approaches 100 million people - 20 million in Russia alone, by
conservative estimate. That number does not include the other millions
of people who were imprisoned, tortured or forced to flee their homes
due to communist aggression in Eastern Europe.

The Rise of Zionism

In the late 1880s, Jews began looking for a permanent place to evade
gentiles irritated by their behavior. The place they envisioned for
their exile was Palestine, portions of which Jews claimed they had
occupied over 2,000 years ago. Jews began a global campaign to
convince the world that they were entitled to 'return' to Palestine.
The leader of this so-called Zionist movement was Theodor Herzl.
Zionism provided the motive for a number of Jewish actions over the
course of the twentieth century, including the manipulations leading
up to the Balfour Declaration (covered below) and the exaggeration of
the severity of the so-called Holocaust. The state of Israel was
brought into being by Jewish terrorism, characterized by such acts as
the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 and the Deir Yassin
massacre in 1948.

To date, Zionism -- which the UN described as a form of racism in its
1975 Resolution 3379 -- has caused much trouble in the world, through
continual violence in the so-called Middle East involving Israel.
American (read: gentile) tax dollars fund the state of Israel to the
tune of billions a year, which is one of the chief causes of Arab
anger towards the U.S.

The Creation of the Federal Reserve Corporation

In 1913, the U.S. Congress authorized the creation of the Federal
Reserve banking system, which is also known as the Federal Reserve
Corporation. This private, non-governmental entity issues America's
money. The Federal Reserve pays the U.S. Treasury a small fee to print
'Federal Reserve Note' currency, which is later loaned to the U.S.
government.

The Federal Reserve system was created largely by the actions of
Jewish banker Paul M. Warburg. It is debt money because when the U.S.
government needs money -- i.e., more money than the U.S. treasury
receives from taxes -- it borrows the cash from the Federal Reserve
(such borrowing is now routine). The government then agrees to pay
back the money that it borrowed from the corporation with added
interest paid on the collateral for the loan (the collateral being
interest-bearing government bonds). That interest -- minus smaller
government debts such as foreign aid -- is the national, or federal,
debt, or, what America owes the Federal Reserve Corporation.

The Federal Reserve also controls interest rates and the amount of
money that circulates within America, giving it enormous power over
the U.S. economy.

As the debt money system continues to be used, America's national debt
climbs, leading to the American citizen being progressively over-taxed
through the silent theft of inflation.

Of significance is that the leadership of the Federal Reserve and the
key owners of the corporation's stock -- i.e., banks -- have been
disproportionately Jewish. Even today, a Jew named Alan Greenspan
heads that corporation. (How ironic that the same year that America
gave up control of its money to private bankers, Canada did as well
under the Bank Act of 1913. In fact, private banks control the money
of almost all Western countries, and yes, those banks are very often
owned or controlled by Jews).

WWI

Fact: America became involved in WWI due to Jewish intervention.
England was in danger of losing the war when Jews secretly approached
the British government with an unusual offer: the Jews, using their
powerful influence within American President Woodrow Wilson's inner
circle, would persuade Wilson to enter America into the war if the
British government would declare its support for the creation of a
Jewish homeland in Palestine. As a result of that offer, Wilson's
close Jewish advisors, such as Louis Brandeis, Bernard Baruch and
Rabbi Stephen Wise, urged Wilson to aid the British war effort by
committing American troops to enter WWI. Another Jew, Chaim Weizmann,
was the key player on the British side of the plan to inject America
into WWI. That the vast majority of the American people wanted nothing
to do with the European war, and that Wilson had campaigned on the
specific promise to keep America out of the war, turned out not to
matter. The will of the people was abandoned for the will of the Jews.

The British government pledged its support for the creation of a
Jewish state in a document that became known as the Balfour
Declaration. That declaration was issued after America had entered
WWI. The Balfour Declaration was written by one Jew, Leopold Amery,
and edited by another Jew, Louis Brandeis, who was the first Jewish
justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. The reader should be aware of the
fact that WWI led directly to WWII. In fact, many people feel that
WWII was merely a continuation of WWI.

'Russian' Revolution/Comintern Founded

Probably the most important event in recent history, aside from WWII,
was the so-called 'Russian' Revolution, which occurred in late 1917.
In that revolution, communists gained control of Russia, murdering and
enslaving millions of its citizens, most of whom were gentiles. Nearly
all of the top communists in Russia -- first called 'Bolsheviks' but
later 'Soviets' -- were Jewish and not from Russian stock. Their
leader, V.I. Lenin, was, as we mentioned previously, part-Jewish.
After Lenin's death, Joseph Stalin led the Soviet communists. Stalin
was not Jewish but he was married to a Jew (in his third, common-law
marriage). The Russian Revolution was financed by the Jewish banker
Jacob Schiff, who furnished the communists with millions of dollars.

After gaining control of Russia, the Soviets spread communism
worldwide through an organ of the Soviet government called the
Comintern. The Comintern sent agents around the globe to foment
revolutions which, it hoped, eventually would result in the
installation of communist regimes in every nation. The Comintern was
run by a Jew named Grigory Zinoviev. Because of the Comintern's
actions many countries around the world were later enslaved under
communist dictatorships, e.g. North Korea and Cuba. China was also
communized by Jewish/Soviet emissaries, e.g. Adolf Abramovitch Joffe
(aka Yoffe) and Mikhail Markovich Borodin.

It should be recognized that the mass murder that occurred in Russia
from 1917 onward was carried out almost exclusively by Jews, including
Lazar Kaganovich, Leon Trotsky, Yakov Sverdlov, Yakov Yurovsky and
Genrikh Yagoda. The few top Soviet officials who were not Jewish were
married to Jews, for example Rykov, Molotov, Dzherzhinsky and Bukharin
(not counting the previously-mentioned Stalin). Soviet communism had
racially-Jewish roots until Stalin became frustrated with their
domination of the government and purged a significant number of Jews
including Kamenev, Zinoviev, Radek, and Yagoda.

Of interest regarding the 'Russian' Revolution is that British leader
Winston Churchill wrote a newspaper article in 1920 titled "Zionism
versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People," in
which he echoed the coming Nazis in pointing out that that the
'Russian' revolution was led mostly by Jews. Churchill's
never-mentioned article is available on the web.

The Creation of the Versailles Treaty

Critically important to modern history was the Versailles Treaty of
1919, which carved Germany into pieces as the conclusion of WWI.
European states wanted to punish Germany for her role in the war, and
the way they did so was through that treaty. (It should be recognized
that WWI was not started by Germany, as is often claimed, but by
Austria-Hungary, which declared war upon Serbia in July 1914). Under
the questionable Versailles Treaty, parts of Germany were given to
various European countries including France, Poland, Denmark and
Belgium.

Most important about the Versailles Treaty, however, was the fact that
Jews were key advisors to most if not all of the top government
officials who attended the peace conference that produced it. The Jew
Bernard Baruch advised U.S. President Wilson at the conference, while
British Prime Minister Lloyd George was advised by the Jew Phil
Sassoon. And French leader Georges Clemenceau was advised by his
Jewish Interior Minister Georges Mandel aka Louis Rothschild.
Furthermore, Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise advised U.S. president
Wilson about matters surrounding the impending treaty before Wilson
left America to attend the peace conference. The Versailles Treaty
caused WWII to occur by default, culminating in Hitler attempting to
unravel the Versailles Treaty by invading Poland in 1939. The treaty
was unjust and several Western leaders admitted that it was, including
British Prime Minister A. Neville Chamberlain.

The Impact of Jewish Marxists/Socialists in pre-Hitler Germany

From just after WWI until the early 1930s Germany was in severe
turmoil. Among the worst of her troubles were communist
revolutionaries starting riots in German cities lasting as long as
five days. The riots were intended to destabilize Germany as a first
step towards communization of the country. Also among Germany's
troubles was incredible monetary inflation.

Most of Germany's troublemaking revolutionaries were Jewish. Karl
Radek, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg, for example. In fact, those
three people attempted coups in several European locations.

Furthermore, pre-Hitler -- aka Weimar -- Germany was run by a
government containing many Jews, such as Foreign Minister Walter
Rathenau. The Weimar constitution was even written by a Jew, Hugo
Preuss. Jews drove the leftist and Marxist movements in Germany, which
influenced, for example, such matters as art and architecture and even
sexual behavior. Weimar Germany's media were also largely in Jewish
hands, as were her financial institutions -- not surprising since Jews
tend to dominate these vocations in most Western countries.

Hitler Comes to Power, and the Frankfurt School Leaves for America

When Adolf Hitler assumed power in Germany in 1933, he set about
correcting the problems Germany faced. Among his actions were
imprisoning Jewish revolutionaries and strengthening the German
economy by the ingenious use of 'Mefo' bonds, which in a short time
transformed Germany's economy into the most powerful in Europe.
Indeed, Germany achieved full employment in four years under Hitler's
rule. (It is important to contrast Hitler's quick and successful
transformation of Germany's economy to American president F. D.
Roosevelt's failed attempts to rescue America's economy from a severe
depression. FDR's economic programs were largely 'artificial' in that
the government, not private business, created jobs via large projects
funded by U.S. tax dollars. In other words, tax dollars were used to
pay taxpayers).

Coinciding with the rise of Nazism, an influential group of Jewish
intellectuals fled Germany and came to America. This group, known as
the Frankfurt School, injected Marxist ideas into American life via
major U.S. universities. The Frankfurt School -- including such Jews
as Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm and Max Horkheimer --
profoundly changed America's social fabric. Indeed, much of the social
turmoil of the 1960s can be traced to the prior influence of these
Frankfurt Jews.

The Beginnings of WWII and the Role of FDR's Jewish Cabal

In the early 1930s, certain Jews began to set the stage for WWII. In
both Britain and America, Jews in important positions of power
maneuvered to get the British and American governments to actively
oppose Hitler's Germany. Furthermore, Jews themselves declared
financial 'war' on Germany just after Hitler took power. Such a 'war'
declaration occurred before Hitler had imprisoned the Jews or
curtailed Jewish legal rights. In other words, Jews struck the first
blow in their battle against Hitler's new regime.

It is important for the reader to understand that long before Hitler
had imprisoned the Jews or invaded any country, American president
Franklin D. Roosevelt officially recognized Germany's enemy, the
communist Soviet Union (in November 1933), That the president of a
free country would recognize a brutal communist state that had already
murdered millions of people -- a fact likely known to Roosevelt -- is
significant, and offers insight into Roosevelt's administration. Some
of the people surrounding Roosevelt were communists, for example U.S.
Treasury official Harry Dexter White. Other Roosevelt staffers were,
if not actual communists, then sympathetic towards communism, e.g.
FDR's vice-president Henry Wallace. Roosevelt himself told Congressman
Martin Dies that "several of the best friends I have got" were
communists (noted in the Congressional Record, Sept. 22, 1950, page
A6832).

The Jews in Roosevelt's inner circle persuaded him to treat both
Germany and Japan as dangerous enemies of America, which Roosevelt
did. Concerning Britain, powerful Jews such as Bernard Baruch worked
to push top officials in the same direction. (Of note regarding
England vis-a-vis Germany is that when Winston Churchill was in severe
debt due to gambling losses, he became indebted to Baruch since Baruch
helped rescue him from bankruptcy[2]; the world will likely never know
to what lengths Churchill was willing to go to return Baruch's favor.
Furthermore, Churchill deeply disliked Germany, and possibly envied
Hitler's success).

When President Roosevelt suggested in a speech in 1937 that America
might have to wage war in the near future, watchful Americans knew
that war with the future Axis powers -- Germany, Japan and Italy --
was imminent. Such an early suggestion of war, years before WWII
began, gave good insight into Roosevelt's intentions.

Roosevelt knew that war with Japan would provide a back door through
which America could enter WWII. That entry would allow America to help
defeat Hitler for the benefit of both world Jewry and England. FDR
knew that if he punished Japan - an ally of Germany - past a certain
point, the Japanese would attack America in retaliation. In fact, as
historian Harry Elmer Barnes pointed out in his 1953 book "Perpetual
War For Perpetual Peace," FDR began to antagonize Japan soon after
becoming president in 1933. In the end, FDR and world Jewry got
exactly what they wanted: the defeat of Nazi Germany, the biggest
threat to ever face world Jewry and international leftism. It must be
clearly understood: WWII was all about Germany and the Jews. Japan was
but a secondary issue, despite outward appearances to the contrary.

Before WWII began, Jew-dominated Hollywood played a crucial role in
persuading American citizens that Hitler and the Germans were
dangerous to America's safety. For example, Hollywood produced movies
that portrayed the Germans as wanting to take over either America or
the entire world. One such film was "Confessions of a Nazi Spy,"
starring Jewish actor Edward G. Robinson.

Jews were also key players in silencing people who opposed the growing
anti-Germany movement in America. Prominent citizens who questioned
the dangerousness of Germany to America were labeled "isolationists"
and fiercely criticized. Those isolationists, such as famed aviator
Charles Lindbergh, were unofficially blacklisted in America, their
voices silenced by a concerted campaign funded largely by Jewish
money. Jews funneled money into many anti-Germany organizations, such
as the Fight For Freedom Committee, which received some winking
support from Roosevelt's administration.

Also of note concerning the beginnings of WWII was Hitler's unique
economy. Among other features, the German economy had a barter system
that cut out the international Jewish bankers. For example, Germany
traded trucks to Argentina in exchange for grain. Instead of both
Germany and Argentina approaching international bankers for loans at
high interest rates, both countries simply bypassed the lenders via
barter. Such exchanges angered the Jew-dominated global financiers. As
a result, economic warfare was directed against Germany by Jew-led
factions fearful that other nations might copy her example.

The event that officially started WWII, Hitler's invasion of Poland,
can be explained by the fact that Hitler was attempting to reverse the
unfairness of the Versailles Treaty and reclaim traditionally German
territory. Hitler asked Poland at least twice to return the city of
Danzig and the Polish Corridor to Germany before invading in 1939.
Poland refused. Also of significance is that after Hitler invaded
Poland, he offered to pull his troops out of that country if he could
keep Danzig and the Corridor. Britain and France refused Hitler's
offer. (Did they prefer war instead?)

Of further importance concerning WWII is the fact that Hitler probably
did not realize how influential Jews were in shaping the policies of
the British government in 1939. Hitler likely thought that he was
opposing only gentiles in England. What he probably did not realize
about Britain was that, like most European governments, Britain was
beholden to powerful Jews. Those Jews not only aided the British
government financially, they also traveled in the highest social
circles, having been named 'barons' and 'lords' long before. The Jews
received those lofty titles not for their heritage but instead for
their important financial services to the British government. In fact,
ever since Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews to return to England in
the 1650s (they had been expelled by King Edward the First, known as
"Longshanks," in 1290), Jews had exercised significant influence on
political and social events in England.

The popular idea that Britain and France had to guarantee Poland's
borders by declaring war on Germany after Germany invaded Poland is
wrong. Days after Germany invaded Poland, the Soviets invaded as well,
from the opposite side. Britain and France did not then declare war on
the Soviet Union. Why did England and France allow the Soviets to
invade Poland but not Germany? The 1939 Anglo-Polish treaty which led
to WWII, and not the secret protocols of it, did not specify which
countries Britain would defend Poland against. Additionally, that
treaty -- the Agreement of Mutual Assistance -- was not properly
ratified since it did not 'sit' for 21 days under the Ponsonby Rule,
as was normally required under British policy. Translation: Britain's
guaranteeing of Poland's borders was unlawful.

Most important of all, however, about WWII is that there is now clear
evidence that certain powerful men had planned to remove Hitler from
power long before he invaded Poland. As outlined in the book Which Way
Western Man? by William G. Simpson, both Winston Churchill and various
powerful Jews began making plans to topple Hitler as early as 1935, by
any means necessary. For example, U.S. General Robert E. Wood told a
U.S. Congressional committee that Churchill told him in 1936 that
England must "smash" Germany. That such a comment came 3 years before
WWII began is of critical historical importance.

The Defeat of Germany and the Creation of the Morgenthau Plan

The defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 was not simply a military victory
for the allies. It amounted to the revenge of world Jewry. The biggest
racial threat to the Jews in recent history -- Nazi Germany -- had not
merely been defeated in war but had been virtually wiped off the map.
Entire cities such as Dresden were burnt to the ground. Millions of
innocent German citizens were either killed, injured or left homeless.
All traces of the former German culture were destroyed. People having
no official role in the Nazi government were executed by the allies,
such as Julius Streicher and Alfred Rosenberg. Other former Nazi
officials were tried and hanged by the allies at Nuremberg using ex
post facto laws, hearsay evidence, and confessions gained under
torture administered by interrogators - who were often Jewish. Of
significance is the fact that as early as December 1942 the allied
powers had decided to prosecute German military personnel for war
crimes committed during WWII.

Roosevelt's August 1944 comment that the entire German people -- not
simply former Nazis -- should be "castrated" to prevent them from
reproducing reveals the Roosevelt administration's attitude towards
Germany in general. U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower said that the top
German officials should be punished beyond the death penalty, whatever
that might have meant. Of possible interest regarding 'Ike's' comment
is that Eisenhower's nickname at West Point military academy was 'The
Swedish Jew.' Also, no castration suggestions were offered by allied
leaders concerning the Japanese people, even though the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor caused America to enter WWII in the first
place. Also of importance is the fact that two Jews -- Henry
Morgenthau, Jr. and the communist Harry Dexter White -- wrote the U.S.
government's Morgenthau Plan, which restructured post-war Germany to
Jewish benefit. A greater example of a conflict of interest would be
hard to find.

Also regarding the matter of post-war Germany, after the war the
director general of the organization in charge of providing food and
housing for homeless Germans (the United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitation Administration, or UNRRA) was a Jew, Herbert Lehman.
UNRRA's chief advisor was also a Jew, David Weintraub.

Jews also played key roles in the prosecution of German military
personnel for war crimes committed during WWII. For example, in the
Malmedy massacre trial (U.S. vs. Valentin Bersin, et al.), the chief
interrogator of the accused German soldiers was a Jew, William Perl.
The chief prosecutor, Burton Ellis, was also a Jew. The chief
assistant prosecutor was a Jew as well, Raphael Schumaker.

Jews were also key players in the U.S. Office of War Information
(OWI), which created anti-Axis films, posters and photos for
propaganda purposes. That propaganda was used to influence the
attitudes of Western citizens towards Germany and Japan. Among the
Jews who worked for OWI were James Paul Warburg, Bernard M. Baruch,
Herbert Marcuse and Leo Rosten. Jews also helped 'de-Nazify' German
military personnel and the German public after WWII, and conflicts of
interests often occurred when that happened. For example, Jewish
Marxist Herbert Marcuse a) advised the allies about how to portray
German fascism to the Western public via mass media; and b) wrote a
handbook for the allies concerning de-Nazification. The
de-Nazification of Germany is so complete today that a German citizen
risks a stiff jail sentence if he merely utters a pro-Nazi comment in
public.

The Founding of the UN

Not only was the 'architect' of the United Nations, Leo Pasvolsky,
Jewish, but among the most important people involved in the founding
of the UN in 1945 were Jewish communists, such as Victor Perlo, Harry
Dexter White and Solomon Adler. The UN is a global entity of
considerable power which has influenced the cultures of many Western
countries. For example, in the late 1940s America adopted at least
some educational ideas that were created by a UN department called
UNESCO (i.e., those found in their Towards World Understanding
report). Those ideas concerned the content of textbooks in American
schools. President Truman's Commission on Higher Education endorsed
the ideas, which included teaching children about the benefits of
"international government" (aka 'surrendering much of your country's
autonomy to a global body').

The controversial 1951 UN/UNESCO 'Statement on the Nature of Race and
Race Differences,' which denied human racial differences and altered
peoples' attitudes about race, was largely the invention of infamous
Jewish anthropologist Ashley Montagu. That statement seemed to further
highlight the ongoing Jewish agenda on race. Another example of that
agenda: as far back as 1935, Franz Boas -- the Jewish godfather of
race-denial who inspired Montagu's efforts -- approached two top
scientists and asked them to create an anti-racism/race-denial
statement, which would be signed by many other scientists and then
publicized. Both of the scientists that Boas approached,
anthropologist and psychologist Livingston Farrand and biologist
Raymond Pearl, turned Boas down. Not one to give up easily, Boas then
approached yet another race expert, anthropologist Earnest Hooton.
Hooton agreed to create such a race statement (he sent it to seven top
scientists but only one signed it).

Amazingly, the UNESCO race statement claimed that Jews are not a race
or ethnic group, even though Jews contract 'Jewish diseases,' such as
Tay-Sachs disease.

Other top experts who created race-denying/race-downplaying material
for the UN or UNESCO were also Jewish, including Melville Herskovits,
Otto Klineberg and Harry Shapiro. In fact, Jews pioneered the
false-but-ubiquitous 'official' theory that racial differences between
Whites and non-Whites do not really exist. The teachings of the Jews
mentioned above were used to drastically alter Western culture, e.g.
in arguing for the enactment of civil-rights legislation.

Despite the usual UN stance on Israel/Palestine, the UN has been good
for Jews, i.e. the UN's social leveling programs and equality-for-all
ideology have drastically lessened 'anti-Semitism' worldwide.

The Control of Eastern Europe After WWII

Not only was Russia controlled by Jews for many years, but countries
in post-war Eastern Europe were as well. For example, communist Poland
was run by Jewish figures including Jacob Berman, Boleslaw Bierut and
Colonel Jozef Rozanski. Communist Romania was run by people such as
Ana Pauker, Avram Bunaciu and Valter Roman. Hungary's communist
government was also heavily Jewish, for example Mathias Rakosi, Ernest
Gero and Michael Farkas. Under the leadership of those Jews, hundreds
of thousands of people -- most of them gentiles -- were murdered,
tortured or imprisoned throughout Eastern Europe.

The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) Investigations

In 1947 the U.S. Congress, via the House Un-American Activities
Committee (HUAC), began investigating the Hollywood film industry due
to charges that Hollywood had been infiltrated by communism (it had
been). A large number of actors, directors and screenwriters were
members of the Communist Party and as such were getting marching
orders from the Soviet Union. During that period, a group of people
known as the Hollywood Ten refused to answer questions before the HUAC
committee. They were then charged with contempt of Congress. A
disproportionate number of the Hollywood Ten were Jews, including
Herbert Biberman, Samuel Ornitz, Ring Lardner, Jr. and Albert Maltz,
as were the people who were 'blacklisted' during that era. (A
blacklisting meant that a person could not work in Hollywood due to
his political activities.)

Of important note concerning HUAC was how that committee -- and the
similar McCarthy committee later on -- was portrayed by the media and
Hollywood. HUAC's mission - identifying people who were attempting to
communize America on behalf of the Soviet Union -- was described as an
un-American 'witch hunt.' Declassified U.S. and Soviet government
reports, such as the Venona Intercepts, show that those 'witch
hunters' were correct: communists had infiltrated many areas of
American society.

Significantly, the majority of American communist leaders have been
Jews, including Herbert Aptheker, Victor Perlo, Jay Lovestone and
Benjamin Gitlow.

The Founding of Israel

Immense and concerted pressure was placed upon U.S. President Harry
Truman so that he would endorse the idea of creating a Jewish state in
Palestine. Naturally, most of that pressure came from Jews. Indeed, at
one point Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler led a group of Jews to the
White House. There, during a conversation with Truman, Celler pounded
on the president's desk and said that if Truman did not give his
blessing for a Jewish nation, "we'll run you out of town." In fact,
Truman said that "extreme Zionists" had threatened him. Also of note
is the fact that Truman's Jewish friend Eddie Jacobson contacted
Truman to urge him to support a Jewish state. But before Jacobson
contacted Truman, Jacobson was briefed on Palestinian matters by Dewey
Stone, a Zionist leader (which might make one wonder how Jacobson came
to contact Truman and on whose behalf he might have been acting).

The creation of the state of Israel was extremely important to the
Jews. Most of all, it gave them legitimacy. They were no longer seen
as a small tribe of 'troublemakers' who moved from country to country
getting evicted nearly every time. Now they were a people with their
own country and the trappings that go with it: ambassadors, a large
army and nuclear weapons. The Jews had finally arrived on the world
stage.

It should be understood that Israel was literally founded on
terrorism: Jewish revolutionaries, such as Menachem Begin, shot and
blew-up British soldiers, foreign diplomats and scores of Arabs in a
violent effort to reclaim 'their' land. (Ironically, Israel now
condemns and fights terrorism).

Today, the Zionist lobby in Washington, D.C. wields enormous power
over Congress. As a result, Congressmen dare not criticize Israel in
public; those who do are usually not re-elected. Another result of
Zionist power in Washington is the ever-increasing funding of the
state of Israel by U.S. taxpayers.

Arabs and Muslims throughout the world hate America and most other
White countries because they see those countries as partners and
protectors of Israel, which they are - especially America.

The Cold War

The 'cold' war between America and the Soviet Union, which began just
after WWII and which was centered around both countries' nuclear
arsenals, became more sophisticated and more expensive as America
entered the 1950s. Billions of U.S. tax dollars were spent on atomic
weapons and various security features both inside and outside of the
U.S.

Of importance is the fact that the Cold War would never have occurred
in the first place if Jews hadn't created the Soviet Union.
Ironically, Jews a) were prime figures in creating America's first
atomic weapons program, called 'The Manhattan Project'; and b) were
also key players in networks which secretly provided U.S. atomic
weapons technology to the Soviet Union, e.g. the Rosenbergs, Harry
Gold and Robert Soblen. (For more information on the transfer of
atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, see the Fuchs-Gold or the
Rosenberg spy ring cases in American historical documents).

The Increased Use of the Word "Democracy" in America

As the Jewish foothold in the American publishing world became more
solid, there appeared an increased use of the term "democracy" within
books, newspapers and magazines to describe America.

The U.S. constitution contains no mention of "democracy," nor did
America's founders use that word. America was created instead as a
White republic in which only White males could vote or hold public
office, and the Jews are very aware of that fact.

The U.S. Civil-Rights Movement

The history of the 1950s-1960s civil-rights movement might go
unnoticed by many White citizens if it were not for the fact that that
movement was created and steered by Jews, not by Blacks. Indeed, the
NAACP was founded by and run for many years by Jews, such as the
Spingarn brothers. Other important Jews in the NAACP included Henry
Moskowitz, Lillian Wald, Jack Greenberg and Kivie Kaplan.

The groundbreaking Brown v. Board of Education court ruling in 1954
resulted almost entirely from the work of Jewish lawyers and activists
connected with the NAACP, for example Jack Greenberg. Indeed, the
legal brief for Brown was signed almost exclusively by Jews. Jewish
activist Esther Swirk Brown was also a prime player in the Brown case.
In fact, Swirk Brown actually launched the Brown case herself.[3]

It could be said that, within the U.S. Congress at least,
Representative Celler (see elsewhere in this essay) launched the Black
civil-rights movement in America via his House bill H.R.6127, which
when signed into law became the first civil-rights law created since
the 1800s: the Civil Rights Act of 1957.

Furthermore, the constitutionally questionable U.S. Civil Rights Act
of 1964 came from a Jew, i.e. Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
7152. That act created, among other things, affirmative action. It
ended the practice of business owners deciding for themselves whom to
hire and fire. In fact, the destruction of White rights in America was
caused largely by the Jew-created and Jew-led civil-rights movement.

(Of possible interest to the reader is that the Civil Rights Act of
1964 created the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC), which is responsible for ensuring that private employers obey
the racial mandates of Title VII of the Act. Perhaps not surprisingly,
two Jews, Alfred and Ruth Blumrosen, were key players in the
construction of the EEOC, and Alfred was also the commission's first
compliance chief (and is also referred to as its conciliations chief).
Mr. Blumrosen shaped the racial quota guidelines that the EEOC would
follow for decades to come. In fact, Blumrosen could be considered to
be the godfather of racial quotas in America - at least as far as
federal enforcement of racial quotas in employment is concerned.[4]
Furthermore, Sonia Pressman, a Jewish EEOC attorney, was a prime
figure in the movement to extend the EEOC's reach to include
gender-discrimination-in-employment into its legal jurisdiction.
Pressman worked with NOW, a feminist group containing many Jews, in an
attempt to force the EEOC to become more involved with gender bias
matters).

The civil-rights movement also transformed the attitudes of American
Blacks: before the civil-rights movement Blacks were largely
respectful of Whites. Today Blacks openly denigrate White culture and
challenge White authority. They demand that 'whitey' now show them
respect which they may or may not have earned.

The Vatican's 1965 'Nostra Aetate' Declaration

As Look magazine noted in January 1966, in an article titled "How The
Jews Changed Catholic Thinking," a Jew named Jules Isaac approached
the Vatican about a possible Catholic condemnation of 'anti-Semitism.'
His action resulted in the famous, official Vatican ruling that the
Jews were not responsible for Jesus Christ's death. The ruling was a
very significant victory for all Jews worldwide. Of importance is that
after the Vatican statement was issued, Jews did not then issue a
similar declaration admitting to and condemning Judaism's historic and
harsh anti-gentile attitudes - attitudes which pre-date Christianity.

U.S. Immigration Law Altered

Jews have also led the movement in the U.S. Congress to open America
to non-European immigration. The best example of that is the 1965
Immigration Act, aka the Hart-Celler Act, which resulted in a
revolutionary change in U.S. immigration rules. Congressman Celler was
the point man for that law, even though he is listed second, after
Hart, in the title 'Hart-Celler.' Indeed, President Johnson mentioned
Celler twice at the signing of the bill, H.R. 2580, into law on Oct.
3, 1965, but did not mention Hart. Other Jews in Congress such as
Jacob Javits and Herbert Lehman also spearheaded the movement to allow
more non-Europeans into America. An influential Jew and immigration
lawyer named Edward Dubroff regularly advised Congressman Celler about
immigration issues.

Additionally, powerful Jewish organizations carried out intense,
ongoing campaigns in order to pressure individual Congressmen to vote
for the loosening of U.S. immigration laws. At nearly every step of
the campaign to alter U.S. immigration rules, Jews were at the
forefront.


The Rise of American Leftism and Counterculture

Not surprisingly, the American political Left was built largely by
Jews as well. For example, Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid
the foundation for the American 'hippie' counterculture via his
popular book One-Dimensional Man (1964). Other famous Jews who led the
1960s hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul
Krassner. Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement from behind
the scenes by publishing, writing for, or editing leftist newspapers
and magazines. And anti-war/college activism groups were
disproportionately filled with Jews, too, e.g. Students for a
Democratic Society (SDS), the top leaders of which were Jews, for
example Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and Mike Klonsky.

Similarly, most of the leaders of the feminist movement have been
Jews, for example Betty Friedan, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Lucy Komisar
and Gloria Steinem. Most of the leaders of the homosexual-rights
movement have been Jews, such as Larry Kramer, Alan Klein and Arnie
Kantrowitz. Gun control in the U.S. Congress has been dominated by
Jews such as Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Howard Metzenbaum.
Indeed, Jews created two landmark anti-gun laws in the 1990s: the
Brady law, which came from Howard Metzenbaum and Charles Schumer, and
the assault-rifle ban, which came from Dianne Feinstein and Schumer.
In fact, America's first significant anti-gun legislation, the Gun
Control Act of 1968, came from Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
17735. Probably the most disturbing anti-gun legislation in recent
years - for gun owners and constitutional-rights advocates alike -
came from Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg, whose domestic confiscation
provision became law in 1996. That law prevents someone convicted of a
certain misdemeanor crime from owning a gun. In other words, a
misdemeanor conviction abolishes a constitutional right that our
gentile Founders gave us.

Even the famous 1969 Woodstock rock-and-roll concert was created by
Jews: Michael Lang, Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
Furthermore, a Jewish man named Elliot Tiber persuaded yet another
Jew, Max Yasgur, to allow the Woodstock concert to be held on Yasgur's
farmland.

Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.

The Growth of Hollywood and the U.S. Media

Of tremendous importance to America's culture is that the Hollywood
film community, and the American media as well, is dominated by Jews.
In fact, Jews founded the major Hollywood movie studios, e.g. Carl
Laemmle (Universal Pictures), William Fox (Fox Film Corp.), Louis B.
Mayer (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures).

Some of the more well-known Jews in modern Hollywood and the media
include film directors Steven Spielberg and Woody Allen, the Disney
Co.'s Michael Eisner, actors Dustin Hoffman and Kirk Douglas,
comedians Milton Berle and Don Rickles and news journalists Mike
Wallace, Barbara Walters and Ted Koppel (more information about Jews,
Hollywood and the media can be found in the essay "Who Rules America?"
by National Vanguard Books, available on the web or in their book
catalogue).

Indeed, as the 1960s hippie revolution was occurring, another
revolution of sorts was happening in Hollywood. Jewish network
executives began to churn out movies and TV shows featuring Black
actors in leading roles. Hollywood also produced a notorious movie
that featured an interracial relationship, which was still taboo at
the time. It is apparent that the Jews in Hollywood, believing that
the pro-White attitudes of America's Founders would never return,
became much bolder during the 1960s. (Regarding the Founders'
attitudes about race, a law created in the Founders' era, 'Act of
March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104),' stated that only Whites could become
American citizens. In fact, non-Whites had no significant rights in
America until the XV Amendment was created in 1870).

As America entered the 1970s it became common for White Americans to
see Blacks, Jews and even Asians in prominent vocations on TV shows
and in movies. Those minorities were seen portraying judges, police
detectives and attorneys on screens big and small all over the U.S.

Non-Hollywood media also flourished in America from the 1960s onward.
The news departments at most broadcasting companies were run by, or
heavily staffed by, Jews. Major U.S. newspapers also came under Jewish
control as small newspapers were bought out by big media conglomerates
which were dominated by Jews. Furthermore, as American culture was
being socially 'Jewified,' so were the cultures of other Western
countries being similarly Jewified via American movies and TV shows,
which became popular in many countries. America served as a base of
sorts for the exporting of Jew-created movies and TV shows which
featured leftist and politically-correct messages, which served
various Jewish social objectives.

The Rise of Big Capitalism

Big capitalism drives corner grocers out of business and outsources
jobs to third-world countries. It encourages materialism. And it leads
to the importing of inexpensive goods in massive quantities, which
also causes American jobs to vanish.

Even though Jews are known for their leftist behavior, they
nonetheless pioneered giant capitalism and corporatism. Jews
especially pioneered conglomerates, in which one large company owns a
dozen smaller companies.

The Rise of Neoconservatism

Beginning in the 1980s, the conservative or "right-wing" political
movement in America was slowly overtaken by what is known as the
"neoconservative" movement. The neoconservative ideology is not really
conservative but is instead politically moderate, and is even liberal
regarding certain issues like civil rights. The neoconservative
movement was launched by formerly-liberal Jews and its current leaders
are mostly Jews. The neoconservative movement's main focus is on how
to use America to protect the interests of Israel.

Neoconservatism has resulted in America being alienated from many
former allied countries in the world, e.g. France.

Neoconservatism has now almost completely replaced traditional
conservatism in America, with genuine conservatives now consigned to
the margins of politics and often referred to as "racists" or
"bigots."

The Bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks

In October 1983, 220 U.S. Marine Corp soldiers were killed in a
suicide bombing of their barracks in Beirut, Lebanon. The Marines were
stationed in Beirut due to Israel's actions - most especially because
of Israel's role in the 1982 massacre of hundreds of Palestinians at
the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut.

Today, the barracks bombing is but a distant memory, and few people
connect the event with Israel.

Holocaust Remembrance Emerges as a Growth and Guilt Industry

Since the 1970s, the Jewish memorializing of the Holocaust has become
an industry of enormous and ever-increasing size. So powerful and
industrialized is Holocaust-remembrance-mania that some American
states require, by law, the teaching of Holocaust education in public
schools. Law-enforcement training academies often mandate Holocaust
studies as well.


The Sept. 11, 2001 attack on America/the 2003 Iraq War

The terrorist attack(s) upon the United States on Sept. 11, 2001
transformed not only America but also the rest of the West. It caused
all of the White Western countries to reexamine, and then rebuild,
their security apparatuses, at significant financial expense. More
than that, it changed how those countries viewed the Arab world, since
the attack appeared to have been planned and carried out by Arab
extremists.

As a result of the 2001 attack, the U.S. Congress passed a
heavy-handed law called the "USA PATRIOT Act." That law canceled or
curbed many of the rights that Americans had traditionally enjoyed -
rights that the Founders had included into the Bill of Rights.

It is no longer a secret that the reason the United States was
attacked by terrorists in Sept. 2001 was because of America's vigorous
support of Israel. Put another way, Jews caused the Sept. 11, 2001
attack, albeit indirectly, for if it wasn't for powerful Zionist
political influence in Washington, D.C., the United States would not
have been so staunchly supportive of Israel. (In fact, America didn't
vigorously support Israel until the 1973 Middle East war. Shortly
after that war, a Jewish-American diplomat, Henry Kissinger, created a
strong, lasting partnership between America and Israel by engineering
a document called the "Memorandum of Understanding." That document
created, for all practical purposes, the so-called "special"
relationship that now exists between the two countries).

The 2001 terrorist attack upon the U.S. also led to America's
involvement in the 2003-present Iraq War, since the former event was
used in a vague, roundabout way as an excuse for American soldiers to
invade and occupy Iraq.

Of significance regarding America's involvement in the Iraq War was a
committee within America's Pentagon called the Office of Special Plans
(OSP). The OSP was designed to funnel information about Iraq directly
to the White House, thereby bypassing the usual filters that such
information would normally travel through, i.e. other governmental
intelligence agencies. According to news sources, shortly before the
Iraq War, the OSP provided President George W. Bush with certain
information about Iraqi weapons programs. That information was
incorrect, but nonetheless it was later used by the White House as a
reason for American soldiers to invade Iraq - an invasion carried out
for Israel's benefit [5].

The OSP was staffed by a number of Jews, such as Harold Rhode, Douglas
Feith and OSP director Abram Shulsky. Feith, and various other
so-called "neoconservatives," had a history of suggesting an attack
upon Saddam Hussein's Iraq dating back to the 1990s, e.g. they were
involved in the creation of a 1996 policy paper that mentioned
"removing Saddam Hussein from power" [6]. That such a removal idea
emerged years before the pre-war "discovery" of Saddam's "weapons of
mass destruction" is significant. Furthermore, under OSP's watch,
Israeli officials came and went at the Pentagon in the days prior to
the Iraq War (apparently to aid American war efforts) while observing
few of the standard security procedures intended for visitors [7].
Also, the OSP itself was conceived by a Jew, Paul Wolfowitz, and
further, it worked closely with an anti-Iraq committee located within
the Israeli government, a committee which was similar to OSP in its
anti-Iraq aims [8].

It should be noted that the major claims of OSP regarding Iraq - that
Saddam had ties to the terrorist group Al Qaeda and that he possessed
"weapons of mass destruction" - proved to be false.

It is probable that without the actions of Jews, the Sept. 11, 2001
terrorist attack upon America and the 2003 Iraq War would not have
occurred, nor would America be such a vigorous supporter of Israel. In
fact, it is easy to conclude that America would have no significant
"Arab problem" if not for Jews.

The Creation of the U.S. Anti-Semitism-Monitoring Office

In 2004, an office was created within the U.S. State Department to
"monitor" anti-Semitism worldwide, despite the fact that 1) that
department insisted that it did not want such an office to be created;
and 2) America is not a Jewish country.

The legislation which created the anti-Semitism-monitoring office,
called the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, came from Jewish
congressman Tom Lantos as bill H.R. 4230.

It was a big victory for the Jews. That office gave world Jewry a
powerful, 'official' weapon with which to combat people who oppose
Jewish supremacism and/or Zionism. (One might wonder how it's the
business of the U.S. government if, for example, anti-Semitic acts are
committed in Thailand. One might also wonder why there are no U.S.
government offices designed to monitor anti-White, anti-Black or
anti-Christian behavior worldwide).

Like the previously-mentioned OSI and the neoconservative movement, we
again see the Jews using the U.S. government as a tool with which to
further their racial agenda.

Summary

The information above shows that the impact that Jews have had upon
the world -- and especially upon the West -- during the past 200 years
is remarkable. Important questions arise from the impact of the Jews:
without their actions, would WWII have occurred? Would America have
had a 50-year Cold War with the Soviet Union? Would the Soviet Union
even have existed in the first place? Would the Vietnam War have
occurred? Would America be as politically liberal as it is today?
Would America have been involved in wars in the Middle East? Those are
questions for Westerners to ponder at length.

Even more remarkable is how the Western public never hears about the
influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist' or
'socialist' are used to describe Jewish social activists in the West
but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that that lack of mention of the
Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to their tremendous
power. By using a) frequent mentions of the Holocaust; b) the media;
c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and e) significant political
influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to their ends. Gentiles who
complain about that Jewish rebuilding -- and their own dispossession
as a result of it -- are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and marginalized into
ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined above is, again, not
a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive behavior by them,
which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
oppressed yet again, or, will be again expelled from Western countries
(Jews have been expelled from most Western countries at one time or
another).

Also curious, and telling, is the fact that even though the religion
of Judaism is based upon bigotry, that fact is rarely mentioned by
modern Christians. Their silence about Judaism's hatred is both
widespread and quite noticeable, as if Christians are constantly
checking themselves to ensure that they aren't uttering "anti-Semitic"
words or phrases. In other words, the power of the Jews is so great
that it actually produces self-censorship within the world's Christian
communities.

Finally, it is interesting to note how quickly Jews accomplished the
rebuilding of America, the Western powerbase of the Jews: in roughly
50 years. Before President Roosevelt took office in 1933 Jews had
little influence upon American culture on the whole. But by 1983 Jews
dominated American culture via television, movies, newspapers,
magazines and other cultural organs. That a people constituting just
2.5% of the U.S. population could significantly alter the culture of
the most powerful country in the world in such a short time is very
significant. Also significant is that there is not a single
educational institution anywhere in the United States in which you
will see the facts about Jews and their interests assembled and
presented in logical connection as we have here.


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html http://www.nsm88.com/
Hugh Gibbons
2006-12-17 04:59:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Captain Compassion
The Lieberman maneuver
Regardless of Sen. Tim Johnson's health, Bush could easily hand the
Senate back to the GOP -- by appointing the Connecticut senator to
fill Bolton's slot at the U.N.
Lieberman would never take the job. Give up a Senate seat to be a mere
ambassador? I don't think so.

_______________________________________________

Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and
truth shall be to them that devise good.

Prov 14:22
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...