Discussion:
LA Democrat queers failed to have enough water to fight fires
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2025-01-12 02:56:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Nope.

=====

It took all of 30 seconds to find rainfall information that clearly shows that "climate change" has had no impact on rainfall and moisture levels in
the area. In fact southern California is in the midst of a wet period. Look into the history of fires in the region if you seek truth.

https://laalmanac.com/weather/we13.php

=====

Your superstitions aren't supported by history. The past century was one of the wettest on record in California

https://web.archive.org/web/20170519044151/https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/01/30/graphic-californias-droughts-in-the-past-1200-years/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhDQZCObkAArxmr?format=jpg&name=medium

=====

The funny thing is that California's climate over the last century or so has been exceptionally wet relative to its historical trends. I've said for
a long time that if its climate ever reverts to "usual," then CA would be in trouble. Maybe it's finally returned to normal.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg1bxMfW4AAGyYZ?format=jpg&name=large

=====

California just had its wettest back-to-back rain season since 1890.

Now please enjoy this global warming headline from The Weather Channel in 2016:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GPVojNSboAASwKB?format=jpg&name=large

=====

December:

Ireland's Extreme Cold Warnings Extended

Heavy Snow Buries Japan

Northern Hemisphere Snow Trackers

UK Braces For -20c (-4f)

Ideology Above Energy Security

Finland To -38.9c (-38f)

Madhya Pradesh Freezes

Southern US States Expecting Heaviest Snow In Years

Kashmir's Cold Kills

Record Freeze Grips Pakistan

Depleting European Gas Reserves

Michael Mann Ordered To Pay $530,820.21 In Long-Running Lawsuit

UK Shivers At -13.3c (8f)

Cold Winter Exacerbates Romania Gas Crisis

Arctic Blast Continues Across The U.S.

Rare Snow Sweeps Sahara Desert

Europe Plunges Below -30C (-22F), Sees Heavy Snow

U.S. Endures Record Cold

Rare Tashkurgan Snow

Global Temperature Nudges Lower

Thailand Freezes

Record Snow In Japan

Parts Of Morocco See Snow For First Time In 50 Years

Cattle Futures Hit Record High Amid Looming Arctic Blast

Three-Day Snow Warning For UK

Extreme Snowfall Paralyzes Northern Norway

Siberia Nears -60c (-76f)

Record Snows For Uttarakhand

"Dangerous Cold"

Snow Reaches Athens

Delhi Plunges

U.S. To Freeze

Arctic Ice Up 26%

Dal Lake Freezes Over

Extreme Snow Roundup

Antarctic Sea Ice Recovering Quite Nicely, Thank You

Murcia's Record Lows

Red Alert In Bidar Amid India's Cold Wave

Italian Alps Hit -31.1c (-24f)

U.S. Cold-Deaths Double Since 1999-The Establishment Blames Global Warming

Japan's Record-Breaking Snowfall

BBC Still Pushing Polar Bear Propaganda

White Christmas For Europe

Bengaluru's Record Cold

Xinjiang Plummets To Record -42.5c

Antarctic Sea Ice Extent Higher Now Than In 1979

Bhopal Breaks 58-Year Record

Vostok At -40c (Again)

The Truth About Iceberg A-68

Extreme Cold And Heavy Snow Slam Finland

Europe Wind Power A "Shit Situation," Says Minister

Winter Weather Grips U.S.

India Reels

Vostok Below -40c

Snow Hits Malaga, Spain

Cold Wave Sweeps Pakistan

Canadian Prairies Near -40c

Texans Warned Of "Extreme Cold"

Antarctic Sea Ice Nearing 1979-1990 Average

"Excellent" Early-Season Snow Across The Alps

Delhi's Record Cold

Chilly Waters Stun Record Number Of Turtles

Record Cold Grips Indore

Asia Chills

Record Snowfall In Midwest

Another Round Of Arctic Air To Hit Much Of North America

Mumbai's Lowest Temp In A Decade

Northern Hemisphere Cold

Russia In The Freezer

India Chills

Northern India's Big Freeze Intensifies

Cold Wave Enters Vietnam

Freezing Lows And Heavy Snows Hit U.S., More To Come

Kashmir Freezes At -18c (-0.4f)

Below Average Antarctic Plateau

Another Round Of Lake-Effect Snow

Cold Waves Lifting Natural Gas Prices

Snow Returns To Scotland And Wider Europe

Global Temperature Tumbles

Antarctic Sea Ice Recovery

Severe Cold Hits Pakistan

Florida Set For Record Cold

Snowy November At Red Mountain

U.S. Battered By Cold And Record Snow

Parts Of Ontario Under A Meter Of Snow

Early-December To Deliver Another Burial To Europe
AlleyCat
2025-01-12 02:56:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.

California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built

https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/

=====

December:

Ireland's Extreme Cold Warnings Extended

Heavy Snow Buries Japan

Northern Hemisphere Snow Trackers

UK Braces For -20c (-4f)

Ideology Above Energy Security

Finland To -38.9c (-38f)

Madhya Pradesh Freezes

Southern US States Expecting Heaviest Snow In Years

Kashmir's Cold Kills

Record Freeze Grips Pakistan

Depleting European Gas Reserves

Michael Mann Ordered To Pay $530,820.21 In Long-Running Lawsuit

UK Shivers At -13.3c (8f)

Cold Winter Exacerbates Romania Gas Crisis

Arctic Blast Continues Across The U.S.

Rare Snow Sweeps Sahara Desert

Europe Plunges Below -30C (-22F), Sees Heavy Snow

U.S. Endures Record Cold

Rare Tashkurgan Snow

Global Temperature Nudges Lower

Thailand Freezes

Record Snow In Japan

Parts Of Morocco See Snow For First Time In 50 Years

Cattle Futures Hit Record High Amid Looming Arctic Blast

Three-Day Snow Warning For UK

Extreme Snowfall Paralyzes Northern Norway

Siberia Nears -60c (-76f)

Record Snows For Uttarakhand

"Dangerous Cold"

Snow Reaches Athens

Delhi Plunges

U.S. To Freeze

Arctic Ice Up 26%

Dal Lake Freezes Over

Extreme Snow Roundup

Antarctic Sea Ice Recovering Quite Nicely, Thank You

Murcia's Record Lows

Red Alert In Bidar Amid India's Cold Wave

Italian Alps Hit -31.1c (-24f)

U.S. Cold-Deaths Double Since 1999-The Establishment Blames Global Warming

Japan's Record-Breaking Snowfall

BBC Still Pushing Polar Bear Propaganda

White Christmas For Europe

Bengaluru's Record Cold

Xinjiang Plummets To Record -42.5c

Antarctic Sea Ice Extent Higher Now Than In 1979

Bhopal Breaks 58-Year Record

Vostok At -40c (Again)

The Truth About Iceberg A-68

Extreme Cold And Heavy Snow Slam Finland

Europe Wind Power A "Shit Situation," Says Minister

Winter Weather Grips U.S.

India Reels

Vostok Below -40c

Snow Hits Malaga, Spain

Cold Wave Sweeps Pakistan

Canadian Prairies Near -40c

Texans Warned Of "Extreme Cold"

Antarctic Sea Ice Nearing 1979-1990 Average

"Excellent" Early-Season Snow Across The Alps

Delhi's Record Cold

Chilly Waters Stun Record Number Of Turtles

Record Cold Grips Indore

Asia Chills

Record Snowfall In Midwest

Another Round Of Arctic Air To Hit Much Of North America

Mumbai's Lowest Temp In A Decade

Northern Hemisphere Cold

Russia In The Freezer

India Chills

Northern India's Big Freeze Intensifies

Cold Wave Enters Vietnam

Freezing Lows And Heavy Snows Hit U.S., More To Come

Kashmir Freezes At -18c (-0.4f)

Below Average Antarctic Plateau

Another Round Of Lake-Effect Snow

Cold Waves Lifting Natural Gas Prices

Snow Returns To Scotland And Wider Europe

Global Temperature Tumbles

Antarctic Sea Ice Recovery

Severe Cold Hits Pakistan

Florida Set For Record Cold

Snowy November At Red Mountain

U.S. Battered By Cold And Record Snow

Parts Of Ontario Under A Meter Of Snow

Early-December To Deliver Another Burial To Europe
Alan
2025-01-12 18:18:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?

How would that be fiscally responsible?

Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Skeeter
2025-01-12 21:31:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
Alan
2025-01-12 22:13:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Skeeter
2025-01-12 23:59:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Alan
2025-01-13 00:26:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
AlleyCat
2025-01-13 13:54:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:26:18 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
"We fucked up."

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-13 16:54:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:26:18 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
"We fucked up."
So you can't.

Got it.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 14:44:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
Alan
2025-01-13 16:54:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.

Got it.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 18:50:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
Alan
2025-01-13 19:54:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.

And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 20:43:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Alan
2025-01-13 21:58:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.

You claim they've admitted it?

PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 22:21:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.
You claim they've admitted it?
PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
Alan
2025-01-13 22:43:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.
You claim they've admitted it?
PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 23:23:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.
You claim they've admitted it?
PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
Not this one but many others at the atart. I told you then.
Alan
2025-01-13 23:25:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.
You claim they've admitted it?
PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
Not this one but many others at the atart. I told you then.
You're lying.

I'm very careful to leave in all the context of that to which I'm replying.
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:34:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.
You claim they've admitted it?
PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
Not this one but many others at the atart. I told you then.
You're lying.
I'm very careful to leave in all the context of that to which I'm replying.
and to snip that which you choose to ignore.
Alan
2025-01-14 20:31:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Do you? They fucked up. No water.
False.
Yes even they admit it.
Show the quote.
Go find it.
So you can't show it.
Got it.
Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
your friend.
You're lying.
And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
right on lying.
They admitted it. You know this.
Nope. I know no such thing.
You claim they've admitted it?
PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
Not this one but many others at the atart. I told you then.
You're lying.
I'm very careful to leave in all the context of that to which I'm replying.
and to snip that which you choose to ignore.
So what?
Siri Cruise
2025-01-12 22:56:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
We are building it.

<https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Groundwater-Recharge>

Groundwater recharge is a key strategy throughout California to
manage water through climate-driven weather extremes, including
prolonged drought and periodic intense storm events, as identified
in the Newsom Administration’s California’s Water Supply Strategy:
Adapting to a Hotter, Drier Future.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-13 06:48:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as long as there
are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!

Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.

California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking taboo for YOU to
care about it?

YOU ARE A FUCKING CUNTNADIAN.

Mind your OWN business.

But anyway:

=====

California Missing Out On Billions Of Gallons Of Stormwater - Los Angeles Times

https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-03-01/california-missing-out-on-billions-of-gallons-of-stormwater

Mar 1, 2024 - California is letting billions of gallons of stormwater wash out to sea each year.

For too long, California and other states have viewed stormwater as either a threat or an inconvenience - something to be whisked away from cities
and communities as quickly as possible. But as traditional sources of water face worsening strain from population growth, agriculture and other
factors, those unused gallons of rainwater pouring across asphalt or down rain gutters are starting to be viewed as an untapped resource that can
help close the widening gap between supply and demand. (unfounded political shit snipped)

=====

What about the New York Times, faggot?

In a Drought, California Is Watching Water Wash Out to Sea

Heavy storms have flooded parts of California, but the state has been unable to capture billions of gallons of water that are flowing unchecked into
the ocean. Los Angeles is embarking on an ambitious new program to change that.

Liberals don't plan ahead. They're instant gratification animals.

=====

Could building water reservoirs have the scope of a high speed rail system AND cost as much of something that they do NOT need, which is going to
cost Californians $135 BILLION?

So WHAT if it costs more? Scrap the doomed-to-fail bullshit high speed rail system and use THAT money to save life, limb, property AND
infrastructure.

High speed rail vs. life-saving water supply?

I vote life and property-saving.

Talk about scope and waste!

Do you think they CARE if they spend a few billion more, after KNOWING the shit THEY waste money on?

Hell, no. They'll just jack up the taxes a mil or two more and call it a session.

You think they give a shit if they spend GOOD money on a GOOD project, that would have potentially saved lives and property? You tell a liberal about
ANYTHING doing THAT, and they'll vote it in, money be damned.

What about the WASTE of money they've ALREADY committed to?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=california+wastes+billions+on&ia=web

=====

Fact Check: Has California Spent $11 Billion On High-Speed Rail Stretch ...

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-has-california-spent-11-billion-high-speed-rail-stretch-1901106

May 15, 2024 - The Fresno River Viaduct, part of the California High-Speed Rail Authority project, did not cost $11 billion to construct. That cost
is part of the total investment from 2006 to 2023, as stated by ...

=====

California Is Letting Billions Of Gallons Of Stormwater Wash ... - Yahoo

https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-missing-billions-gallons-stormwater-110016168.html

Mar 1, 2024 - California is letting billions of gallons of stormwater wash out to sea each year, report finds. Hayley Smith. Fri, March 1, 2024 at
11:00 AM UTC. 9 min read.


=====

California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built

by Jamie Joseph Jan 10, 2025 in Agriculture, Extreme Weather, News and Opinion, Politics

California does not have a water shortage, yet firefighters battling the brutal fires across Los Angeles are facing scarce resources to keep up with
the blaze that has threatened thousands of lives, homes, land, and wildlife.

Meanwhile, critics challenge Gov. Gavin Newsom's call to "not play politics," arguing that political mismanagement is precisely to blame.

"It's all political," Edward Ring, the director of water and energy policy for the California Policy Center think-tank, told Fox News Digital in an
interview.

"The entire cause is political, and they ironically politicize it by saying it's about climate change, which is a political wedge that they use all
the time, which is really one of the least of the factors causing this."

Experts lay blame primarily on the state's handling of its forestry management and a lesser-known problem, the state's outdated water reserves
system.

California's existing reservoirs can only hold so much water, and many were built in the mid-20th century.

Last year, the state experienced record-breaking rainfall after an atmospheric river event, but the existing water infrastructure faced difficulties
managing the sudden influx of water. A significant portion of that rainfall was dumped into the ocean.

Ring also pointed to "environmentalist extremists" in the state who have pushed for heavier regulations like the Endangered Species Act, which
requires freshwater to flow through rivers and into the Pacific Ocean to protect the endangered delta smelt and salmon.

The mandates restrict how much water can be diverted to storage, even during wet years.

"There is plenty of water," Ring argues, but the primary challenge in transporting water south to farmers in the San Joaquin Valley and cities in
Southern California isn't infrastructure capacity-it's environmental policies.

He points to a "consensus among the bureaucrats and board directors" overseeing California's water management that prioritizes keeping more water in
rivers to support the endangered fish.

"That's true as far as it goes," he said, but despite these efforts, the salmon and smelt populations have not recovered. Additionally, there is
growing concern that sturgeon may soon be classified as endangered as well.

"These endangered fish are being used as the reason to leave water in the rivers," he said.

Urban areas, like Los Angeles, have highly developed drainage systems that channel stormwater directly into the ocean. They were originally designed
with flood prevention in mind, not water storage, so this presents an additional challenge for the area.

"They bring water in off of the California Aqueduct, and they import water into Los Angeles, and they haven't brought enough in there, and their
reservoirs are depleted," Ring said.

"But the biggest problem, because you're not going to drain even a half-full reservoir fighting a fire, is the water infrastructure in Los Angeles,
and the water infrastructure in Los Angeles has been neglected. And the reason it's been neglected is that they want the money for other projects."

"The bottom line is they haven't spent money on it, and they've justified that by saying, we have to use less water," he continued. "And so they've
been encouraging people, and in some cases, rationing, or even forcing people to use less water. And as a result, you don't have a system that's as
robust."

One recent ex-California lawmaker said the state's lack of water infrastructure is "devastating California."

California voters passed Proposition 1 in 2014, also known as the Water Quality, Supply and Infrastructure Improvement Act, which authorized $2.7
billion in bonds to increase the state's water storage capacity by building new reservoirs and groundwater storage facilities.

Yet as of January 2025, no new reservoirs have been completed under Prop. 1.

"And here it's been all these years, and we haven't done a shovel full of dirt to move to make the project," Dahle said. "The project is just not
funded, and we had $100 billion in surplus, and we didn't fund it. And so that's the frustrating part, I think, for most Californians, is that when
we had the money, and we didn't do anything about it."

The largest of the wildfires, the Eaton Fire near Altadena and Pasadena, has scorched more than 27,000 acres, Cal Fire reported as of midday
Thursday.

When reached for comment, Newsom's spokesperson Izzy Gardon told Fox News Digital, "The Governor is focused on protecting people, not playing
politics, and making sure firefighters have all the resources they need."


=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-13 07:45:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.

But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Post by AlleyCat
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?

<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
Post by AlleyCat
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
AlleyCat
2025-01-13 13:54:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.

If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.

=====

California Missing Out On Billions Of Gallons Of Stormwater - Los Angeles Times

https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-03-01/california-missing-out-on-billions-of-gallons-of-stormwater

Mar 1, 2024 - California is letting billions of gallons of stormwater wash out to sea each year.

For too long, California and other states have viewed stormwater as either a threat or an inconvenience - something to be whisked away from cities
and communities as quickly as possible. But as traditional sources of water face worsening strain from population growth, agriculture and other
factors, those unused gallons of rainwater pouring across asphalt or down rain gutters are starting to be viewed as an untapped resource that can
help close the widening gap between supply and demand. (unfounded political shit snipped)

=====

What about the New York Times, faggot?

In a Drought, California Is Watching Water Wash Out to Sea

Heavy storms have flooded parts of California, but the state has been unable to capture billions of gallons of water that are flowing unchecked into
the ocean. Los Angeles is embarking on an ambitious new program to change that.

Liberals don't plan ahead. They're instant gratification animals.

=====

Could building water reservoirs have the scope of a high speed rail system AND cost as much of something that they do NOT need, which is going to
cost Californians $135 BILLION?

So WHAT if it costs more? Scrap the doomed-to-fail bullshit high speed rail system and use THAT money to save life, limb, property AND
infrastructure.

High speed rail vs. life-saving water supply?

I vote life and property-saving.

Talk about scope and waste!

Do you think they CARE if they spend a few billion more, after KNOWING the shit THEY waste money on?

Hell, no. They'll just jack up the taxes a mil or two more and call it a session.

You think they give a shit if they spend GOOD money on a GOOD project, that would have potentially saved lives and property? You tell a liberal about
ANYTHING doing THAT, and they'll vote it in, money be damned.

What about the WASTE of money they've ALREADY committed to?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=california+wastes+billions+on&ia=web

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Alan
2025-01-13 22:08:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?

How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
Skeeter
2025-01-13 22:23:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
Alan
2025-01-13 22:43:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?

Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
Skeeter
2025-01-13 23:22:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?
Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
Alan
2025-01-13 23:27:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?
Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.

But feel free to show your sources that say differently.

:-)
pothead
2025-01-13 23:53:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?
Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.
But feel free to show your sources that say differently.
:-)
Talk to the greeniacs.
They are too busy trying to protect the smelt fish which hasn't been seen in 10 years or more.

Overregulation strikes again.

<https://www.newsweek.com/controlled-burns-california-forest-management-los-angeles-fires-2012492>
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Siri Cruise
2025-01-14 04:28:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Talk to the greeniacs.
They are too busy trying to protect the smelt fish which hasn't been seen in 10 years or more.
Why do you want to make salmon extinct in California?
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:33:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vm4p53$29a8q$***@dont-email.me>, ***@www.yahoo.com
says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Talk to the greeniacs.
They are too busy trying to protect the smelt fish which hasn't been seen in 10 years or more.
Why do you want to make salmon extinct in California?
Beats the hell of burning down houses.
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:32:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?
Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.
But feel free to show your sources that say differently.
:-)
You look it up. They didn't. Even the people who live there say so.
Alan
2025-01-14 22:48:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?
Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.
But feel free to show your sources that say differently.
:-)
You look it up. They didn't. Even the people who live there say so.
And yet you can't produce a single source...
Nadegda
2025-01-14 20:00:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
How did they "fuck up"?
Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
Of course he doesn't. Understanding things is for "libtards".
--
Childless Cat Lady #3

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
pothead
2025-01-13 23:02:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
For the same reason the libbys claimed:

1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
etc.

The list is endless.

These libbys are mentally ill.
Don't get sucked into the weeds with them because they will keep moving
the goal posts to keep your wheels spinning.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-13 23:17:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?

Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
pothead
2025-01-13 23:20:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.

Thank you for proving my point.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-13 23:26:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.

The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
pothead
2025-01-13 23:49:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
1. Of course utilizing a massive amount of water in this case will lower pressure and deplete supplies.
The question is, why in an area well known for brush fires, was the infrastructure not improved?
It's a little late, but maybe they can apply for Biden's "Infrastructure Bill money".

2. Trump has nothing to do with this.

3. Again, poor planning, reallocating budgets, DEI practices and so forth made LA vulnerable.
Even the lesbo fire department heads are complaining that they did not have the budget because
of cuts.

Like most of CA, the liberals have destroyed the state.
Their policies suck and focus on the wrong things.
So today, Newsom claims he is going to pause the environmental and permit, building regulations
so that the rebuilding is not slowed down.

That should tell you that overregulation runs rampant in CA and other than generating income for
the state ends up causing delays and rising the cost of building.

Libbys love regulations.
Especially useless ones.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-14 00:57:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
1. Of course utilizing a massive amount of water in this case will lower pressure and deplete supplies.
The question is, why in an area well known for brush fires, was the infrastructure not improved?
It's a little late, but maybe they can apply for Biden's "Infrastructure Bill money".
Do you have any idea who LONG it would take to upgrade all the water
pipes in LA?
Post by pothead
2. Trump has nothing to do with this.
Did I say he did?
Post by pothead
3. Again, poor planning, reallocating budgets, DEI practices and so forth made LA vulnerable.
Even the lesbo fire department heads are complaining that they did not have the budget because
of cuts.
How does her being a "lesbo" impact anything?
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:25:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
1. Of course utilizing a massive amount of water in this case will lower pressure and deplete supplies.
The question is, why in an area well known for brush fires, was the infrastructure not improved?
It's a little late, but maybe they can apply for Biden's "Infrastructure Bill money".
Do you have any idea who LONG it would take to upgrade all the water
pipes in LA?
How about as long as they have had?
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
2. Trump has nothing to do with this.
Did I say he did?
You will.
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
3. Again, poor planning, reallocating budgets, DEI practices and so forth made LA vulnerable.
Even the lesbo fire department heads are complaining that they did not have the budget because
of cuts.
How does her being a "lesbo" impact anything?
And ignore the rest.
Alan
2025-01-14 20:33:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
1. Of course utilizing a massive amount of water in this case will lower pressure and deplete supplies.
The question is, why in an area well known for brush fires, was the infrastructure not improved?
It's a little late, but maybe they can apply for Biden's "Infrastructure Bill money".
Do you have any idea who LONG it would take to upgrade all the water
pipes in LA?
How about as long as they have had?
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
2. Trump has nothing to do with this.
Did I say he did?
You will.
Ah! Another psychic!
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
3. Again, poor planning, reallocating budgets, DEI practices and so forth made LA vulnerable.
Even the lesbo fire department heads are complaining that they did not have the budget because
of cuts.
How does her being a "lesbo" impact anything?
And ignore the rest.
The rest of what: a bunch of utterly unsupported bullshit?
Siri Cruise
2025-01-14 04:40:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Even the lesbo fire department heads
Bigotted as always.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-14 07:11:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hey Midget...

Trump WINS!

=====

Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and
who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has
*NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...

Greatest fuckups on Usenet.

"That's a *lie*. It and methane *absolutely* are causing global warming, the the(sic) CO2 and methane *are* from human economic activity." - Rudy
Canoza

"Narcissistic cowards who have kill-filed mt(sic)" - Rudy Canoza

When An Involuntarily Retired (Pruned Deadwoo)(sic) - Rudy Canoza

It is a dark moment *entire*(sic) created by... - Rudy Canoza

"This(sic) comments" - Rudy Canoza

Fuck off with you(sic) copypasta. - Rudy Canoza

"Wnenever(sic) Hartung starts off with "So...", e.g. "So what you're saying
is...", what follows is always a straw man, which is a type of lie." - Rudy Canoza

"You already squandered you(sic) one reply." - Rudy Canoza

"You found it somewhere and copypastaed(sic) - Rudy Canaoza

"So, the judge was actually *is*(sic) actually a felon." - Rudy Canaoza

"It choose(sic) you" - Rudy Canaoza

THEN, he fucks up his own fuckup.

"It chooe(sic) you"? - Rudy Canoza

[giggle]

"Adversary and enemy are not synonyms." - Rudy Canoza(sic)

AlleyCat, the narcissist, ,(sic) The Insanely Jealous Narcissist - Rudy Canoza

The vast majority of political violence in the U.S>(sic) is committed by far right-wingnuts. - Rudy Canaoza

"LOL... Ruy(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canoza

THEN, fucks up again, trying to right his wrong. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"LOL... Ruey(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canaoza

"Adversary and enemy are not synonyms." - Rudy Canoza

Not a fuck up, per se... just a lie.

Look (sic) Rudy makes me do - Rudy Canaoza

No. The subject line is a a ie(sic). - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again" - Rudy Canoza

"You don't(sic) your ass from your face, shitbag." - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again"" - Rudy Canoza

"Decent People Laught"(sic) - Rudy Canoza

"I have reduce(sic) my assets." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to "preserve our liberty." - Rudy Canoza

"It would if were were(sic) writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"You didn't even read you(sic) copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"living rent-free in you(sic) diseased imagination." - Rudy Canoza

Yes, *YOU* know where I kicke(sic) your squat-to-piss no-fight faggot ass, you fat fairy. - Rudy Canoza

"No one aksed(sic) you, Google Groups faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"Eric Schild - hysterical histrionical estogen(sic)-oozing squat-to-piss fairy - squealed" - Rudy Canoza

Estogen? What the fuck is Estogen, brainiac?

"That exclude(sic) McEnany and you, and also Trump." - Rudy Canoza

"Oh, that's right: you're(sic) Nazi." - Rudy Canoza

Thursday, October 10, 2019: "Trump has *failed* to delegitimate(sic) the impeachment effort, as the growing public support for it shows." - Rudy
Canoza

Wednesday, August 4, 2020: "As I already explained: *every* word Trump says about the election is part of an attempt to try to delegitimate(sic) it
in advance." - Rudy Canoza

Tuesday, August 3, 2020: "Everything he says about the election is intended to destabilize and delegitimate(sic) it." - Rudy Canoza

Friday, August 7, 2020: "No. Trump's deliberate attempts to delegitimate(sic) the election are well proved." - Rudy Canoza

Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

"[snip plagiarized bullshit that AlleyPussyBitch has'nt[sic] even read]" - Rudy Canoza - 6/15/21 - Contraction error...funny!

"I have reduce(sic) my assets." - "Bill Flett" - 6/12/21 - More verb tense problems for our uneducated lil guy. - Rudy Canoza

"I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to 'preserve our liberty.'" - Wednesday is Verb Problem day for Dwarfling, "Rudy Canoza" 6/9/21

"It would if were[sic] were writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy Canoza 6/8/21

"You didn't even read you[sic] copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy Canoza - 6/8/21 - Pronoun problems for The Dwarf

"living rent-free in you[sic] diseased imagination." - "Rudy Canoza" - 2/10/21 - More dwarfish pronoun problems

"The(sic) did not "invade" anything, ratboy." --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/10/21 Article or pronoun? Which is it to be?

"The salient characteristic of right-wingnut shitbags like ratboy"(sic). --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/8/21 No verb, therefore it is not a sentence. Tsk-tsk.

"Fuck off with Delwaware."(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/23/21 The Dwarfling discovers a new state!

"When Nazi sympathizer(sic) like you are exterminated" - "Orni Thopter" 7/23/21 Even Rudy's socks have problems with plurals. - Rudy Canoza

"*(A)ny*(sic) measure the(sic) either outright prevents eligible voters from voting"(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)
(sic)(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/19/21 More problems with articles...

"She's an excellent judge, and his(sic) criticism of Trump's truly shitty lawyers is spot-on." - "Rudy Canoza" 7/12/21 More gender-shifting? Hahaha.
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:22:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
No backup water.
Alan
2025-01-14 22:49:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
same time.
Jennifer Rubin
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
Post by pothead
2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
And Trump?
Post by pothead
3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
were cheap fakes.
Why don't you stick to the facts?
Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
torn up at once?
Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
and head into the weeds.
Thank you for proving my point.
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.
No backup water.
Nope.

Competely and utterly wrong.

Look up "pressure head".
Siri Cruise
2025-01-14 03:52:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously
results in low
water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
When would this "planning" have had to happen?
How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in
pipes large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
Some of the fires are near unlimitted reservoirs like the Pacific
Ocean. Fire trucks carry pumps run off the motor and water tanks.
They can set up truck to truck hoses to push water inland and have
trucks go to the beach to refill.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-14 06:22:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and
who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has
*NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration

=====

"That's a *lie*. It and methane *absolutely* are causing global warming, the the(sic) CO2 and methane *are* from human economic activity." - Rudy
Canoza

"the the"?

"Narcissistic cowards who have kill-filed mt(sic)" - Rudy Canoza

Yout ben kill-filed?

When An Involuntarily Retired (Pruned Deadwoo)(sic) - Rudy Canoza

If you're speaking of cars... it's "Daewoo".

It is a dark moment *entire*(sic) created by... - Rudy Canoza

"This(sic) comments" - Rudy Canoza

Fuck off with you(sic) copypasta. - Rudy Canoza

"Wnenever(sic) Hartung starts off with "So...", e.g. "So what you're saying
is...", what follows is always a straw man, which is a type of lie." - Rudy Canoza

"You already squandered you(sic) one reply." - Rudy Canoza

"You found it somewhere and copypastaed(sic) - Rudy Canaoza

"So, the judge was actually *is*(sic) actually a felon." - Rudy Canaoza

"It choose(sic) you" - Rudy Canaoza

THEN, he fucks up his own fuckup.

"It chooe(sic) you"? - Rudy Canoza

[giggle]

"Adversary and enemy are not synonyms." - Rudy Canoza(sic)

AlleyCat, the narcissist, ,(sic) The Insanely Jealous Narcissist - Rudy Canoza

The vast majority of political violence in the U.S>(sic) is committed by far right-wingnuts. - Rudy Canaoza

"LOL... Ruy(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canoza

THEN, fucks up again, trying to right his wrong. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"LOL... Ruey(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canaoza

"Adversary and enemy are not synonyms." - Rudy Canoza

Not a fuck up, per se... just a lie.

Look (sic) Rudy makes me do - Rudy Canaoza

No. The subject line is a a ie(sic). - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again" - Rudy Canoza

"You don't(sic) your ass from your face, shitbag." - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again"" - Rudy Canoza

"Decent People Laught"(sic) - Rudy Canoza

"I have reduce(sic) my assets." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to "preserve our liberty." - Rudy Canoza

"It would if were were(sic) writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"You didn't even read you(sic) copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"living rent-free in you(sic) diseased imagination." - Rudy Canoza

Yes, *YOU* know where I kicke(sic) your squat-to-piss no-fight faggot ass, you fat fairy. - Rudy Canoza

"No one aksed(sic) you, Google Groups faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"Eric Schild - hysterical histrionical estogen(sic)-oozing squat-to-piss fairy - squealed" - Rudy Canoza

Estogen? What the fuck is Estogen, brainiac?

"That exclude(sic) McEnany and you, and also Trump." - Rudy Canoza

"Oh, that's right: you're(sic) Nazi." - Rudy Canoza

Thursday, October 10, 2019: "Trump has *failed* to delegitimate(sic) the impeachment effort, as the growing public support for it shows." - Rudy
Canoza

Wednesday, August 4, 2020: "As I already explained: *every* word Trump says about the election is part of an attempt to try to delegitimate(sic) it
in advance." - Rudy Canoza

Tuesday, August 3, 2020: "Everything he says about the election is intended to destabilize and delegitimate(sic) it." - Rudy Canoza

Friday, August 7, 2020: "No. Trump's deliberate attempts to delegitimate(sic) the election are well proved." - Rudy Canoza

Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

"[snip plagiarized bullshit that AlleyPussyBitch has'nt[sic] even read]" - Rudy Canoza - 6/15/21 - Contraction error...funny!

"I have reduce(sic) my assets." - "Bill Flett" - 6/12/21 - More verb tense problems for our uneducated lil guy. - Rudy Canoza

"I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to 'preserve our liberty.'" - Wednesday is Verb Problem day for Dwarfling, "Rudy Canoza" 6/9/21

"It would if were[sic] were writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy Canoza 6/8/21

"You didn't even read you[sic] copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy Canoza - 6/8/21 - Pronoun problems for The Dwarf

"living rent-free in you[sic] diseased imagination." - "Rudy Canoza" - 2/10/21 - More dwarfish pronoun problems

"The(sic) did not "invade" anything, ratboy." --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/10/21 Article or pronoun? Which is it to be?

"The salient characteristic of right-wingnut shitbags like ratboy"(sic). --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/8/21 No verb, therefore it is not a sentence. Tsk-tsk.

"Fuck off with Delwaware."(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/23/21 The Dwarfling discovers a new state!

"When Nazi sympathizer(sic) like you are exterminated" - "Orni Thopter" 7/23/21 Even Rudy's socks have problems with plurals. - Rudy Canoza

"*(A)ny*(sic) measure the(sic) either outright prevents eligible voters from voting"(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)
(sic)(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/19/21 More problems with articles...

"She's an excellent judge, and his(sic) criticism of Trump's truly shitty lawyers is spot-on." - "Rudy Canoza" 7/12/21 More gender-shifting? Hahaha.
AlleyCat
2025-01-13 13:54:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as long as there
are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!

Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.

California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking taboo for YOU to
care about it?

YOU ARE A FUCKING CUNTNADIAN.

Mind your OWN business.

But anyway:

=====

California Missing Out On Billions Of Gallons Of Stormwater - Los Angeles Times

https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-03-01/california-missing-out-on-billions-of-gallons-of-stormwater

Mar 1, 2024 - California is letting billions of gallons of stormwater wash out to sea each year.

For too long, California and other states have viewed stormwater as either a threat or an inconvenience - something to be whisked away from cities
and communities as quickly as possible. But as traditional sources of water face worsening strain from population growth, agriculture and other
factors, those unused gallons of rainwater pouring across asphalt or down rain gutters are starting to be viewed as an untapped resource that can
help close the widening gap between supply and demand. (unfounded political shit snipped)

=====

What about the New York Times, faggot?

In a Drought, California Is Watching Water Wash Out to Sea

Heavy storms have flooded parts of California, but the state has been unable to capture billions of gallons of water that are flowing unchecked into
the ocean. Los Angeles is embarking on an ambitious new program to change that.

Liberals don't plan ahead. They're instant gratification animals.

=====

Could building water reservoirs have the scope of a high speed rail system AND cost as much of something that they do NOT need, which is going to
cost Californians $135 BILLION?

So WHAT if it costs more? Scrap the doomed-to-fail bullshit high speed rail system and use THAT money to save life, limb, property AND
infrastructure.

High speed rail vs. life-saving water supply?

I vote life and property-saving.

Talk about scope and waste!

Do you think they CARE if they spend a few billion more, after KNOWING the shit THEY waste money on?

Hell, no. They'll just jack up the taxes a mil or two more and call it a session.

You think they give a shit if they spend GOOD money on a GOOD project, that would have potentially saved lives and property? You tell a liberal about
ANYTHING doing THAT, and they'll vote it in, money be damned.

What about the WASTE of money they've ALREADY committed to?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=california+wastes+billions+on&ia=web

=====

Fact Check: Has California Spent $11 Billion On High-Speed Rail Stretch ...

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-has-california-spent-11-billion-high-speed-rail-stretch-1901106

May 15, 2024 - The Fresno River Viaduct, part of the California High-Speed Rail Authority project, did not cost $11 billion to construct. That cost
is part of the total investment from 2006 to 2023, as stated by ...

=====

California Is Letting Billions Of Gallons Of Stormwater Wash ... - Yahoo

https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-missing-billions-gallons-stormwater-110016168.html

Mar 1, 2024 - California is letting billions of gallons of stormwater wash out to sea each year, report finds. Hayley Smith. Fri, March 1, 2024 at
11:00 AM UTC. 9 min read.

=====

California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built

by Jamie Joseph Jan 10, 2025 in Agriculture, Extreme Weather, News and Opinion, Politics

California does not have a water shortage, yet firefighters battling the brutal fires across Los Angeles are facing scarce resources to keep up with
the blaze that has threatened thousands of lives, homes, land, and wildlife.

Meanwhile, critics challenge Gov. Gavin Newsom's call to "not play politics," arguing that political mismanagement is precisely to blame.

"It's all political," Edward Ring, the director of water and energy policy for the California Policy Center think-tank, told Fox News Digital in an
interview.

"The entire cause is political, and they ironically politicize it by saying it's about climate change, which is a political wedge that they use all
the time, which is really one of the least of the factors causing this."

Experts lay blame primarily on the state's handling of its forestry management and a lesser-known problem, the state's outdated water reserves
system.

California's existing reservoirs can only hold so much water, and many were built in the mid-20th century.

Last year, the state experienced record-breaking rainfall after an atmospheric river event, but the existing water infrastructure faced difficulties
managing the sudden influx of water. A significant portion of that rainfall was dumped into the ocean.

Ring also pointed to "environmentalist extremists" in the state who have pushed for heavier regulations like the Endangered Species Act, which
requires freshwater to flow through rivers and into the Pacific Ocean to protect the endangered delta smelt and salmon.

The mandates restrict how much water can be diverted to storage, even during wet years.

"There is plenty of water," Ring argues, but the primary challenge in transporting water south to farmers in the San Joaquin Valley and cities in
Southern California isn't infrastructure capacity-it's environmental policies.

He points to a "consensus among the bureaucrats and board directors" overseeing California's water management that prioritizes keeping more water in
rivers to support the endangered fish.

"That's true as far as it goes," he said, but despite these efforts, the salmon and smelt populations have not recovered. Additionally, there is
growing concern that sturgeon may soon be classified as endangered as well.

"These endangered fish are being used as the reason to leave water in the rivers," he said.

Urban areas, like Los Angeles, have highly developed drainage systems that channel stormwater directly into the ocean. They were originally designed
with flood prevention in mind, not water storage, so this presents an additional challenge for the area.

"They bring water in off of the California Aqueduct, and they import water into Los Angeles, and they haven't brought enough in there, and their
reservoirs are depleted," Ring said.

"But the biggest problem, because you're not going to drain even a half-full reservoir fighting a fire, is the water infrastructure in Los Angeles,
and the water infrastructure in Los Angeles has been neglected. And the reason it's been neglected is that they want the money for other projects."

"The bottom line is they haven't spent money on it, and they've justified that by saying, we have to use less water," he continued. "And so they've
been encouraging people, and in some cases, rationing, or even forcing people to use less water. And as a result, you don't have a system that's as
robust."

One recent ex-California lawmaker said the state's lack of water infrastructure is "devastating California."

California voters passed Proposition 1 in 2014, also known as the Water Quality, Supply and Infrastructure Improvement Act, which authorized $2.7
billion in bonds to increase the state's water storage capacity by building new reservoirs and groundwater storage facilities.

Yet as of January 2025, no new reservoirs have been completed under Prop. 1.

"And here it's been all these years, and we haven't done a shovel full of dirt to move to make the project," Dahle said. "The project is just not
funded, and we had $100 billion in surplus, and we didn't fund it. And so that's the frustrating part, I think, for most Californians, is that when
we had the money, and we didn't do anything about it."

The largest of the wildfires, the Eaton Fire near Altadena and Pasadena, has scorched more than 27,000 acres, Cal Fire reported as of midday
Thursday.

When reached for comment, Newsom's spokesperson Izzy Gardon told Fox News Digital, "The Governor is focused on protecting people, not playing
politics, and making sure firefighters have all the resources they need."


=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration

Message-ID: <***@news.eternal-september.org>
Skeeter
2025-01-13 14:47:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Alan
2025-01-13 22:00:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...

...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...

...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.

:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.

That's just a fact.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 22:22:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Alan
2025-01-13 22:42:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.

That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...

...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.

It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
Skeeter
2025-01-13 23:21:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
Alan
2025-01-13 23:28:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Nope. Not even close.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
It was shut down AGES ago for repair.

And now you're bringing up electricity as an issue?

Why?
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:26:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Nope. Not even close.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
It was shut down AGES ago for repair.
And now you're bringing up electricity as an issue?
Why?
Are you that stupid?
pothead
2025-01-13 23:29:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.

Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-13 23:32:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...

...right?
pothead
2025-01-14 00:01:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.

<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.

Thanks again for proving my points.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-14 00:58:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?

Be specific.

Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
pothead
2025-01-14 01:20:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
Blue states subsidizing red states has nothing to do with policies that
blue states enact in order to waste money.

I'm done with your endless meta thread garbage.
Go back to arguing Apple vs Linux vs Windows because at least you know
something about that topic.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-14 01:23:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
What budget cuts? The 2% cut?

That's it? That's yoru big bad policy decision?
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
Blue states subsidizing red states has nothing to do with policies that
blue states enact in order to waste money.
It might make an intelligent person wonder why they have so much more
money than blue states.

But I can see why that let's you out.
pothead
2025-01-14 01:29:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
What budget cuts? The 2% cut?
That's it? That's yoru big bad policy decision?
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
Blue states subsidizing red states has nothing to do with policies that
blue states enact in order to waste money.
It might make an intelligent person wonder why they have so much more
money than blue states.
But I can see why that let's you out.
<https://www.thecentersquare.com/opinion/article_44669866-adb3-11ee-96a1-3f9bfb526300.html>
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-14 23:03:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
What budget cuts? The 2% cut?
That's it? That's yoru big bad policy decision?
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
Blue states subsidizing red states has nothing to do with policies that
blue states enact in order to waste money.
It might make an intelligent person wonder why they have so much more
money than blue states.
But I can see why that let's you out.
<https://www.thecentersquare.com/opinion/article_44669866-adb3-11ee-96a1-3f9bfb526300.html>
From a right wing mouth piece like William Haupt III?

Do you really want to get into the specifics of the facts he presents
and what he omits?

Let's examine just one:

'The 10 states in the best fiscal condition are almost all red states.
Tennessee has never been in the red.'

Let's look at Tennessee in more detail to see how they achieved that
"never in the red" condition:

13th in poverty

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_poverty_rate>

9th in child poverty.

<https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/43-children-in-poverty#ranking/2/any/true/2545/any/322>

45 in infant mortality

<https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm>

And all of that while ranking 11th in percentage of state general
revenue coming from the federal government

So they take a lot from the federal government...

...don't do much to help their people...

...but, hey! Their budget is balanced!
pothead
2025-01-14 23:19:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
What budget cuts? The 2% cut?
That's it? That's yoru big bad policy decision?
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
Blue states subsidizing red states has nothing to do with policies that
blue states enact in order to waste money.
It might make an intelligent person wonder why they have so much more
money than blue states.
But I can see why that let's you out.
<https://www.thecentersquare.com/opinion/article_44669866-adb3-11ee-96a1-3f9bfb526300.html>
From a right wing mouth piece like William Haupt III?
Do you really want to get into the specifics of the facts he presents
and what he omits?
'The 10 states in the best fiscal condition are almost all red states.
Tennessee has never been in the red.'
Let's look at Tennessee in more detail to see how they achieved that
13th in poverty
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_poverty_rate>
9th in child poverty.
<https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/43-children-in-poverty#ranking/2/any/true/2545/any/322>
45 in infant mortality
<https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm>
And all of that while ranking 11th in percentage of state general
revenue coming from the federal government
So they take a lot from the federal government...
...don't do much to help their people...
...but, hey! Their budget is balanced!
If you are replying to me, I'm speaking specifically of LA.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
pothead
2025-01-14 01:24:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
For this link video = article.

Here is the video:


--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Siri Cruise
2025-01-14 04:46:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
levels, do you?
Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
Post by AlleyCat
California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.
Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
Yup
Post by Alan
That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
It was the main one for that area.
Post by Alan
...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
pretty small one at that.
It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
need electricity to pump some of that water.
There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
even keep track of them.
Name one.
Post by pothead
The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
incompetence but it's impossible.
The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
it's not working.
Name one such decision.
Sure.
Right from the LA fire chief.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/12/who-is-kristin-crowley-la-fire-chief>
And how is that a poor policy decision?
Be specific.
Try to say something more than "lesbo".
Obviously you didn't even view the video because the fire chief
was complaining about budget cuts which hurt the department.
It has nothing to do with her being a lesbo.
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
You're the one who brought up the "mess" that certain states are
supposed to have made.
Blue states subsidizing red states has nothing to do with policies that
blue states enact in order to waste money.
I'm done with your endless meta thread garbage.
Go back to arguing Apple vs Linux vs Windows because at least you know
something about that topic.
And you wimp away like your gilded god.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-14 07:20:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
(CNN) Fire Department Funding And Recruitment Policy Come Under Scrutiny As Deadly Los Angeles Blazes Rage On

As firefighters continue to battle raging fires across Los Angeles County, a cut to the Los Angeles Fire Department 2025 budget and its commitment to
recruiting a more diverse force have come under attack.

LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley is facing criticism for prioritizing diversity, equity and inclusion within the department. Meanwhile, Crowley has
expressed concerns about a $17.4 million cut to the department's 2025 budget, which included reductions in overtime staffing. The finger-pointing has
politicized what's being described as the most destructive fire in L.A. history.

The fire department budget for 2025 is $819.64 million... down from $837.19 million in 2024.

Budget Cuts:

In June, Mayor Karen Bass approved a city budget of almost $13 billion that included a $17.4 million cut to the LAFD's more than $800 million 2025
budget.

Crowley, in a December memo to the fire commission, said the cuts had "adversely affected the Department's ability to maintain core operations, such
as technology and communication infrastructure, payroll processing, training, fire prevention, and community education." The memo also pointed to a
$7 million reduction in overtime due to fluctuating staffing needs, known as v-hours.

We do not have enough firefighters," she told CNN's Jake Tapper.

=====

Yes, Los Angeles cut $17.6 million from the fire department's budget

The Los Angeles Fire Department's budget was cut by nearly $17.6 million this fiscal year. That's a roughly 2% decrease from the previous year.

THE QUESTION:

Did Los Angeles cut $17.6 million from the fire department's budget?

THE ANSWER:

Check mark, True

This is true. Yes, Los Angeles cut $17.6 million from the fire department's budget. That amount represents a roughly 2% decrease from the previous
year.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
pothead
2025-01-14 14:02:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
(CNN) Fire Department Funding And Recruitment Policy Come Under Scrutiny As Deadly Los Angeles Blazes Rage On
As firefighters continue to battle raging fires across Los Angeles County, a cut to the Los Angeles Fire Department 2025 budget and its commitment to
recruiting a more diverse force have come under attack.
LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley is facing criticism for prioritizing diversity, equity and inclusion within the department. Meanwhile, Crowley has
expressed concerns about a $17.4 million cut to the department's 2025 budget, which included reductions in overtime staffing. The finger-pointing has
politicized what's being described as the most destructive fire in L.A. history.
The fire department budget for 2025 is $819.64 million... down from $837.19 million in 2024.
In June, Mayor Karen Bass approved a city budget of almost $13 billion that included a $17.4 million cut to the LAFD's more than $800 million 2025
budget.
Crowley, in a December memo to the fire commission, said the cuts had "adversely affected the Department's ability to maintain core operations, such
as technology and communication infrastructure, payroll processing, training, fire prevention, and community education." The memo also pointed to a
$7 million reduction in overtime due to fluctuating staffing needs, known as v-hours.
We do not have enough firefighters," she told CNN's Jake Tapper.
=====
Yes, Los Angeles cut $17.6 million from the fire department's budget
The Los Angeles Fire Department's budget was cut by nearly $17.6 million this fiscal year. That's a roughly 2% decrease from the previous year.
Did Los Angeles cut $17.6 million from the fire department's budget?
Check mark, True
This is true. Yes, Los Angeles cut $17.6 million from the fire department's budget. That amount represents a roughly 2% decrease from the previous
year.
Facts always seem to upset the libbys.
BTW I posted the video link in a FUP which of course Rudy ignored.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Skeeter
2025-01-14 16:31:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vm4q4i$29dse$***@dont-email.me>, ***@www.yahoo.com
says...
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?
Goal post move.
Thanks again for proving my points.
How are republicans helping. The cowardly idjt is doing his usual
wimp routine and running away.
Uh in case you didn't know he is not in office yet.
Nadegda
2025-01-14 19:57:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Uhhh... no.
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Perhaps AlleyCat is a suh-suh-suh-SOWWWWWWWWCIALIST!

<snicker>
--
Childless Cat Lady #3

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Siri Cruise
2025-01-14 20:45:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
do you?
How would that be fiscally responsible?
Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
Perhaps AlleyCat is a suh-suh-suh-SOWWWWWWWWCIALIST!
As required by state law, California localities are building
infrastructure to capture more rainfall. Kern and Santa Clara
counties have long done groundwater recharge.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_Groundwater_Management_Act>
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Alan
2025-01-12 18:16:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
Nope.
=====
It took all of 30 seconds to find rainfall information that clearly shows that "climate change" has had no impact on rainfall and moisture levels in
the area. In fact southern California is in the midst of a wet period. Look into the history of fires in the region if you seek truth.
https://laalmanac.com/weather/we13.php
From your same source:

'Through the first six months of this 2024-2025 rainfall season,
Downtown L.A. has not only recorded his driest season since 2017, but
also its second driest season since 1877, when records were first kept.'

<https://www.laalmanac.com/weather/we08aa.php>
Siri Cruise
2025-01-12 22:53:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
'Through the first six months of this 2024-2025 rainfall season,
Downtown L.A. has not only recorded his driest season since 2017,
but also its second driest season since 1877, when records were
first kept.'
Increasingly we get a hot high pressure air mass off the coast
which deflects the Pacific storms to the north.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-13 06:48:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Between 2022-2024, Los Angeles received 54 inches of rain, the highest two-year total in recorded history.

And now back to more of the stupid people screaming about how global warming is to blame for these fires.

=====

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:16:26 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
'Through the first six months of this 2024-2025 rainfall season,
Downtown L.A. has not only recorded his driest season since 2017, but
also its second driest season since 1877, when records were first kept.'
How, EXACTLY does that prove "climate change" is causing wet OR dry conditions?

Anyways... read this again.

It took all of 30 seconds to find RAINFALL INFORMATION THAT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT "CLIMATE CHANGE" HAS HAD NO IMPACT ON RAINFALL...

THAT is the takeaway, moron.

... and moisture levels in the area. In fact SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (and NOT just LA) is IN THE MIDST of a wet period.

The FIRST six months, is just that. What about the LAST six months?

Look into the HISTORY OF FIRES in the region if you seek truth.

https://laalmanac.com/weather/we13.php

=====

Scott Alexander McKenzie

Do NOT Let Them Tell You, "California Is In A Drought".

We are NOT IN A DROUGHT.

Yes, the first half of this rainy season had been light, but our average annual rainfall for the past 9 years has been 1.2 inches ABOVE THE AVERAGE
since 1942.

I live in Paso Robles, which is 30 minutes from the coast and 3.5 hours north of LA.

The reservoirs should be FULL. If they aren't, it's mismanagement.

=====

CALIFORNIA, (and not ONLY Los Angeles), received record rainfall the past 2 years.

Oh, and California government didn't capture and store it. They let it all wash into the ocean.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhCmS8gWMAA7_-L?format=jpg&name=large

=====

Colin McCarthy
@US_Stormwatch
5 Jan 2023

Over 20 trillion gallons of water are expected to fall across California over the next 2 weeks.

That's enough water to cover a flat surface the size of California in over half a foot of water.

https://x.com/i/status/1611075205702746112

What did California do to put ANY of that water in reserve?

=====

Reminder for those screaming climate change.

Los Angeles' 2nd wettest 2 year period on record was last year 2024-2022

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg0favgX0AALoiw?format=jpg&name=large

=====

They have no reservoirs to store all that snow and rain. They are on the shore of the biggest body of water on the planet and have no water to fight
the fires. You can't make this shit up.

=====

California had the second highest back-to-back rain seasons in 2022-2024. All of that record breaking rain run off was not saved in water storage for
fire preparation and response.

It was diverted to the Pacific Ocean because of radical environmental activists.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg3WD1kWMAMX91e?format=jpg&name=large
Loading...