Discussion:
Pardon Every Last One of Them
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2025-01-07 00:28:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol - Bloomberg

Release them all!

https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514

=====

Trump WINS, every time... unless the Democrats cheat! (bunny bait... shhhh... I'm hunting wabbit)

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-07 03:04:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people
convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US
Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
Did you break into the Capitol and
steal furniture?

Trump thinks you are a patriot, have
a pardon!



Did you smash a cop in the face with
a fire extinguisher?

Trump thinks you are a patriot, have
a pardon!



Did you smear your poop on the walls
of Congress?

Trump thinks you are a patriot, have
a pardon!
Radio Gnome
2025-01-07 14:48:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people
convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US
Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
Did you break into the Capitol and
steal furniture?
Trump thinks you are a patriot, have
a pardon!
Did you commit theft of government property?

Biden thinks you're a patriot, have a pardon!
Post by Mitchell Holman
Did you smash a cop in the face with
a fire extinguisher?
Trump thinks you are a patriot, have
a pardon!
Did you committ second degree murder while armed?

Biden thinks you're a patriot, have a pardon.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Did you smear your poop on the walls
of Congress?
Trump thinks you are a patriot, have
a pardon!
Congress deserved this one. But speaking of poop...

Did you commit, may have committed, or will commit, a gun, tax, or any
crime from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024, including but not
limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted (including any that have
resulted in convictions) or any crime against the US?

Biden thinks you're a patriot, have a pardon son.
NoBody
2025-01-07 12:17:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
Post by AlleyCat
=====
Trump WINS, every time... unless the Democrats cheat! (bunny bait... shhhh... I'm hunting wabbit)
Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.
Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.
Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.
Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
A Second Trump Administration
pothead
2025-01-07 14:17:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Siri Cruise
2025-01-07 20:49:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-08 12:25:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
pothead
2025-01-08 13:53:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.

Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-08 14:15:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they
should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Who was convicted of just "wandering around
the outside of the building"?
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who
were given due process are a different situation.
Skeeter
2025-01-08 15:20:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they
should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Who was convicted of just "wandering around
the outside of the building"?
Who was convicted of "rape"?
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who
were given due process are a different situation.
Alan
2025-01-08 16:53:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?

And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".

Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Skeeter
2025-01-08 17:27:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
Alan
2025-01-08 17:30:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.

Extraordinary claims require support.
Skeeter
2025-01-08 17:35:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
Alan
2025-01-08 17:35:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
"I know you are, but what am I"
Skeeter
2025-01-08 17:47:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
"I know you are, but what am I"
I made you say that? What a child.
Alan
2025-01-08 18:13:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
"I know you are, but what am I"
I made you say that? What a child.
What I love most about you is your absolute lack of self-awareness.
Skeeter
2025-01-08 19:59:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
"I know you are, but what am I"
I made you say that? What a child.
What I love most about you is your absolute lack of self-awareness.
I am aware that you are being lead around on a leash.
pothead
2025-01-09 00:47:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.

Oh, just to shut the libbys upone more time:


--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Alan
2025-01-09 02:41:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...

...assuming you know HOW to read:

'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
pothead
2025-01-09 13:34:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.

Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.

Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-09 14:24:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt





Fox News calls it an insurrection:

Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3





Mich McConnell calls it an insurrection:

"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Pierre Delecto
2025-01-09 14:49:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-09 18:26:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.

Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Pierre Delecto
2025-01-09 19:44:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Post by pothead
Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Alan
2025-01-09 19:50:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Skeeter
2025-01-09 22:59:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Alan
2025-01-09 23:01:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.

They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-09 23:22:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that
he DELIBERATELY took.
Nobody was charged with taking. Only keeping.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
NoBody
2025-01-10 12:21:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:22:57 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that
he DELIBERATELY took.
Nobody was charged with taking. Only keeping.
Laughter.

How does that work exactly?
Skeeter
2025-01-09 23:59:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-10 02:57:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual
violence, they should pay the standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these
people and did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the
building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of
property and who were given due process are a
different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply
for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the
building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's
claim that Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides"
for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021,
Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of
lapping up the spin the left wing media station is feeding
you. Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the
prosecutor's side of the story. The idea is to save one's
skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one and
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an
insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
Skeeter
2025-01-10 11:55:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual
violence, they should pay the standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these
people and did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the
building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of
property and who were given due process are a
different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply
for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the
building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's
claim that Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides"
for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021,
Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of
lapping up the spin the left wing media station is feeding
you. Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the
prosecutor's side of the story. The idea is to save one's
skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one and
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
He didn't. They raided his place and took them. Stop being stupid.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-10 14:36:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual
violence, they should pay the standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these
people and did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the
building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of
property and who were given due process are a
different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply
for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the
building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their
demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's
claim that Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides"
for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021,
Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of
lapping up the spin the left wing media station is feeding
you. Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the
prosecutor's side of the story. The idea is to save one's
skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the
committee
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one and
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
He didn't.
Wrong.


"After months of stonewalling by the former
president, Trump’s representatives finally
turned over 15 boxes of records in January
2022, nearly a year after he had left the
White House. To their alarm, NARA officials
discovered that the boxes contained 197
documents with classified markings,
including 92 marked as secret, and 25 marked
as top secret."
https://www.voanews.com/a/the-trump-documents-case-what-you-need-to-
know/7139762.html


"January 17, 2022: Trump turns over 15 boxes
to the National Archives. The boxes are found
to contain 197 documents with classified
markings, including 69 marked confidential,
98 secret and 30 top secret. Some documents
have markings suggesting they include
information from highly sensitive human
sources or the collection of electronic
"signals" authorized by a court under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."
https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/06/13/timeline-of-
classified-documents-case-against-trump


"Two of Trump’s aides returned 15 boxes
of records to the National Archives eight
months later, in January 2022. The Archives
soon determined that 14 of the boxes
contained classified documents and referred
their discovery to the Justice Department,
the indictment says."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-classified-documents-
investigation-timeline-rcna88620
Post by AlleyCat
They raided his place and took them. Stop being stupid.
You know nothing about this issue.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 15:28:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by AlleyCat
says...
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual
violence, they should pay the standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these
people and did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no
way.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Some were simply wandering around outside the
capitol
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the
building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of
property and who were given due process are a
different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply
for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the
building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their
demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's
claim that Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides"
for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021,
Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of
lapping up the spin the left wing media station is feeding
you. Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the
prosecutor's side of the story. The idea is to save one's
skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the
committee
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one
and
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and
McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that
he
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
He didn't.
Wrong.
"After months of stonewalling by the former
president, Trump?s representatives finally
turned over 15 boxes of records in January
2022, nearly a year after he had left the
White House. To their alarm, NARA officials
discovered that the boxes contained 197
documents with classified markings,
including 92 marked as secret, and 25 marked
as top secret."
https://www.voanews.com/a/the-trump-documents-case-what-you-need-to-
know/7139762.html
"January 17, 2022: Trump turns over 15 boxes
to the National Archives. The boxes are found
to contain 197 documents with classified
markings, including 69 marked confidential,
98 secret and 30 top secret. Some documents
have markings suggesting they include
information from highly sensitive human
sources or the collection of electronic
"signals" authorized by a court under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."
https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/06/13/timeline-of-
classified-documents-case-against-trump
"Two of Trump?s aides returned 15 boxes
of records to the National Archives eight
months later, in January 2022. The Archives
soon determined that 14 of the boxes
contained classified documents and referred
their discovery to the Justice Department,
the indictment says."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-classified-documents-
investigation-timeline-rcna88620
Post by AlleyCat
They raided his place and took them. Stop being stupid.
You know nothing about this issue.
He stole nothing.
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-10 18:43:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by AlleyCat
says...
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of
actual violence, they should pay the
standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for
these people and did the punishment match the
"crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted,
no
way.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Some were simply wandering around outside the
capitol
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around
the building.
Those who committed acts of violence,
destruction of property and who were given due
process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted
"simply for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around
the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and
their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker
Carlson's claim that Capitol Police officers acted as
"tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during
the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead
of lapping up the spin the left wing media station is
feeding you. Of course his plea agreement says things
to boost the prosecutor's side of the story. The idea
is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the
committee
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one
and
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox
and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an
insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that
he
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
He didn't.
Wrong.
"After months of stonewalling by the former
president, Trump?s representatives finally
turned over 15 boxes of records in January
2022, nearly a year after he had left the
White House. To their alarm, NARA officials
discovered that the boxes contained 197
documents with classified markings,
including 92 marked as secret, and 25 marked
as top secret."
https://www.voanews.com/a/the-trump-documents-case-what-you-need-to-
know/7139762.html
"January 17, 2022: Trump turns over 15 boxes
to the National Archives. The boxes are found
to contain 197 documents with classified
markings, including 69 marked confidential,
98 secret and 30 top secret. Some documents
have markings suggesting they include
information from highly sensitive human
sources or the collection of electronic
"signals" authorized by a court under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."
https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/06/13/timeline-of-
classified-documents-case-against-trump
"Two of Trump?s aides returned 15 boxes
of records to the National Archives eight
months later, in January 2022. The Archives
soon determined that 14 of the boxes
contained classified documents and referred
their discovery to the Justice Department,
the indictment says."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-classified-documen
ts- investigation-timeline-rcna88620
Post by AlleyCat
They raided his place and took them. Stop being stupid.
You know nothing about this issue.
He stole nothing.
Then why did he return them
when accused of stealing them?
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:17:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by AlleyCat
says...
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of
actual violence, they should pay the
standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for
these people and did the punishment match the
"crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted,
no
way.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Some were simply wandering around outside the
capitol
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around
the building.
Those who committed acts of violence,
destruction of property and who were given due
process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted
"simply for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around
the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and
their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker
Carlson's claim that Capitol Police officers acted as
"tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during
the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead
of lapping up the spin the left wing media station is
feeding you. Of course his plea agreement says things
to boost the prosecutor's side of the story. The idea
is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the
committee
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one
and
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox
and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an
insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that
he
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
He didn't.
Wrong.
"After months of stonewalling by the former
president, Trump?s representatives finally
turned over 15 boxes of records in January
2022, nearly a year after he had left the
White House. To their alarm, NARA officials
discovered that the boxes contained 197
documents with classified markings,
including 92 marked as secret, and 25 marked
as top secret."
https://www.voanews.com/a/the-trump-documents-case-what-you-need-to-
know/7139762.html
"January 17, 2022: Trump turns over 15 boxes
to the National Archives. The boxes are found
to contain 197 documents with classified
markings, including 69 marked confidential,
98 secret and 30 top secret. Some documents
have markings suggesting they include
information from highly sensitive human
sources or the collection of electronic
"signals" authorized by a court under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."
https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/06/13/timeline-of-
classified-documents-case-against-trump
"Two of Trump?s aides returned 15 boxes
of records to the National Archives eight
months later, in January 2022. The Archives
soon determined that 14 of the boxes
contained classified documents and referred
their discovery to the Justice Department,
the indictment says."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-classified-documen
ts- investigation-timeline-rcna88620
Post by AlleyCat
They raided his place and took them. Stop being stupid.
You know nothing about this issue.
He stole nothing.
Then why did he return them
when accused of stealing them?
He didn't. They raided his place and took them.
Alan
2025-01-10 21:44:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by AlleyCat
says...
says...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of
actual violence, they should pay the
standard penalty
before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for
these people and did the punishment match the
"crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no
way.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Some were simply wandering around outside the
capitol
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around
the building.
Those who committed acts of violence,
destruction of property and who were given due
process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted
"simply for wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around
the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and
their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker
Carlson's claim that Capitol Police officers acted as
"tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley during
the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead
of lapping up the spin the left wing media station is
feeding you. Of course his plea agreement says things
to boost the prosecutor's side of the story. The idea
is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the
committee
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
tried to hide that was released AFTER that particular one
and
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox
and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that
he
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
If he had a right to take them
why did he give them back?
He didn't.
Wrong.
"After months of stonewalling by the former
president, Trump?s representatives finally
turned over 15 boxes of records in January
2022, nearly a year after he had left the
White House. To their alarm, NARA officials
discovered that the boxes contained 197
documents with classified markings,
including 92 marked as secret, and 25 marked
as top secret."
https://www.voanews.com/a/the-trump-documents-case-what-you-need-to-
know/7139762.html
"January 17, 2022: Trump turns over 15 boxes
to the National Archives. The boxes are found
to contain 197 documents with classified
markings, including 69 marked confidential,
98 secret and 30 top secret. Some documents
have markings suggesting they include
information from highly sensitive human
sources or the collection of electronic
"signals" authorized by a court under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act."
https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2023/06/13/timeline-of-
classified-documents-case-against-trump
"Two of Trump?s aides returned 15 boxes
of records to the National Archives eight
months later, in January 2022. The Archives
soon determined that 14 of the boxes
contained classified documents and referred
their discovery to the Justice Department,
the indictment says."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-classified-documen
ts- investigation-timeline-rcna88620
Post by AlleyCat
They raided his place and took them. Stop being stupid.
You know nothing about this issue.
He stole nothing.
Then why did he return them
when accused of stealing them?
He didn't. They raided his place and took them.
He most certainly DID give back some of them.

Can't you read?

"January 17, 2022: Trump turns over 15 boxes to the National Archives."
Alan
2025-01-10 03:09:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...

...even assuming that's so...

...how, exactly?
Skeeter
2025-01-10 11:57:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
Alan
2025-01-10 21:45:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.

That is the literal definition of stealing:


steal | stēl |

verb (past stole | stōl |; past participle stolen | ˈstōlən |)

1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
legal right and without intending to return it:
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:55:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
Alan
2025-01-10 22:14:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".

If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 22:52:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
Alan
2025-01-10 23:07:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
There were charges.

That is a fact, doofus.

A grand jury was empanelled and returned indictments:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
Skeeter
2025-01-11 01:43:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
There were charges.
That is a fact, doofus.
Yet nothing happened and he gets to have the documents back BWAAHAHAHA
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
and it's dead in the water.

Moving along to now.
Alan
2025-01-11 01:46:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
There were charges.
That is a fact, doofus.
Yet nothing happened and he gets to have the documents back BWAAHAHAHA
But you agree that there were charges, right?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
and it's dead in the water.
Moving along to now.
You mean you're running away now.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 03:18:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
There were charges.
That is a fact, doofus.
Yet nothing happened and he gets to have the documents back BWAAHAHAHA
But you agree that there were charges, right?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
and it's dead in the water.
Moving along to now.
You mean you're running away now.
That don't mean shit if he wasn't convicted. There were no theft
charges.
Alan
2025-01-11 03:19:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
There were charges.
That is a fact, doofus.
Yet nothing happened and he gets to have the documents back BWAAHAHAHA
But you agree that there were charges, right?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
and it's dead in the water.
Moving along to now.
You mean you're running away now.
That don't mean shit if he wasn't convicted. There were no theft
charges.
Keep sliding those goalposts!
Skeeter
2025-01-11 11:26:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
    And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
"statement against interest": look it up.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
    Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
Yes, he really did.
They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
DELIBERATELY took.
No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
And that makes it better...
...even assuming that's so...
...how, exactly?
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
steal | stel |
verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
anything?
"intending".
If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
not stealing.
No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
There were charges.
That is a fact, doofus.
Yet nothing happened and he gets to have the documents back BWAAHAHAHA
But you agree that there were charges, right?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
and it's dead in the water.
Moving along to now.
You mean you're running away now.
That don't mean shit if he wasn't convicted. There were no theft
charges.
Keep sliding those goalposts!
Nothing happened. No charges and he gets the documents back.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 03:36:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
He likely cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt of stealing, so
that was not charged. DoJ seized material identified by subpoenas
that was kept in defiance of subpoena. He is guilty of keeping,
and that can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Skeeter
2025-01-11 11:28:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <vlsov8$f7d6$***@dont-email.me>, ***@www.yahoo.com
says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
He stole nothing. That's the point.
He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
He likely cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt of stealing, so
that was not charged. DoJ seized material identified by subpoenas
that was kept in defiance of subpoena. He is guilty of keeping,
and that can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
It doesn't matter now. He gets to have the documents back.

Skeeter
2025-01-09 22:58:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Alan
2025-01-09 23:01:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
And another ignoramus doesn't understand what either "statement against
interest" or "hypocrisy" means.
Skeeter
2025-01-09 23:58:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
And another ignoramus doesn't understand what either "statement against
interest" or "hypocrisy" means.
No, I just pointed out your stupidity.
Alan
2025-01-10 03:09:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
And another ignoramus doesn't understand what either "statement against
interest" or "hypocrisy" means.
No, I just pointed out your stupidity.
How exactly did you do that?
Skeeter
2025-01-10 11:57:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
And another ignoramus doesn't understand what either "statement against
interest" or "hypocrisy" means.
No, I just pointed out your stupidity.
How exactly did you do that?
Not my fault you can't read.
Alan
2025-01-10 21:46:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
says...
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
And another ignoramus doesn't understand what either "statement against
interest" or "hypocrisy" means.
No, I just pointed out your stupidity.
How exactly did you do that?
Not my fault you can't read.
It's not my fault you can't articulate...

...or even understand what "articulate" means.
Pierre Delecto
2025-01-10 13:11:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
building.
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
doubt
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
Well you say all he does is lie.
No, I didn't say that.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by pothead
Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
Because Harris was/is that bad.
Alan
2025-01-09 19:22:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pierre Delecto
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt
that the police stood down for whatever reason.
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
He got a promotion for his "work".
Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
Feb 23
https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
"This failed insurrection only underscores
how crucial the task before us is for our
republic."
Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
Lear what "statement against interest" means.
Alan
2025-01-09 19:22:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
As your kind likes to say when innocent black people get shot:

"She should have complied".
Skeeter
2025-01-09 22:56:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Alan
2025-01-09 23:02:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.

If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 00:00:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Alan
2025-01-10 03:10:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!

Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 11:58:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
Alan
2025-01-10 17:01:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...

...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:15:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
Alan
2025-01-10 21:23:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.

What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...

...where there were legislators sheltering...

...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:51:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
Alan
2025-01-10 22:15:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.

This video shows it:

<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.

Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 22:55:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
Alan
2025-01-10 23:08:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Except for the unarmed black men...
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?

Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
persons is not?
Skeeter
2025-01-11 01:41:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Except for the unarmed black men...
Who were they? Are they in the video?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
brought it up.
Post by Alan
Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
persons is not?
What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
What black people? She was murdered.
Alan
2025-01-11 01:48:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Except for the unarmed black men...
Who were they? Are they in the video?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
brought it up.
That's why I'm ASKING you.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
persons is not?
What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
What black people? She was murdered.
She was breaking into an area where law enforcement was protecting people.

If she hadn't tried to climb through the window, she wouldn't have been
shot.
Skeeter
2025-01-11 03:19:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Except for the unarmed black men...
Who were they? Are they in the video?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
brought it up.
That's why I'm ASKING you.
You tried to spin it around and put race into it.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
persons is not?
What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
What black people? She was murdered.
She was breaking into an area where law enforcement was protecting people.
Bullshit. They let them in.
Post by Alan
If she hadn't tried to climb through the window, she wouldn't have been
shot.
Why just her?
Alan
2025-01-11 03:41:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Except for the unarmed black men...
Who were they? Are they in the video?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
brought it up.
That's why I'm ASKING you.
You tried to spin it around and put race into it.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
persons is not?
What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
What black people? She was murdered.
She was breaking into an area where law enforcement was protecting people.
Bullshit. They let them in.
They weren't letting them in to the "Speaker Lobby".

The doors were barricaded and the mob was breaking the windows to get
through.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
If she hadn't tried to climb through the window, she wouldn't have been
shot.
Why just her?
She was the one climbing through.
AlleyCat
2025-01-11 04:22:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:41:25 -0800, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Why just her?
She was the one climbing through.
We'll remember this the next time one of you pansy-ass pussy faggots, who are afraid of guns, thinking THEY just get up and walk out and go kill
people, whine, piss, scream and moan about liberals and Democrats getting their faces blown off by homeowners, after climbing through a window to
rob, rape or kill someone.

=====

Murder Charge Dropped Against Milton, Ont. Man Who Shot Home Intruder ...

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ali-mian-milton-charges-dropped-murder-1.6923046

Jul 31, 2023 - A Milton, Ont. man formerly accused of killing a home intruder earlier this year no longer faces a charge of second-degree murder. On
Monday, the Crown withdrew the charge against Ali Mian, 21, in ...

=====

Deputies: Homeowner Arrested After Fatally Shooting Intruder In ... - KOMO

https://komonews.com/news/local/deputies-homeowner-shoots-kills-intruder-in-mason-county

BELFAIR, Wash. - A homeowner was arrested Saturday morning after he shot and killed an intruder who was taking a shower in his home, Mason County
sheriff's deputies said. Mason County Coroner Wes ...

=====

California Man Arrested After Fatally Shooting Burglary Suspect

https://nypost.com/2024/06/12/us-news/cali-homeowner-arrested-after-fatally-shooting-burglary-suspect/

Jun 12, 2024 - A California homeowner was arrested after fatally shooting a suspected robber trying to break into his home with two other thieves
Monday night, police said. The 77-year-old man was arrested ...

=====

Oakland Homeowner Who Fatally Shot Burglar To Be Released From Jail

https://www.ktvu.com/news/oakland-homeowner-fatally-shot-burglar-released-jail

Jun 13, 2024 - OAKLAND, Calif. - A homeowner in Oakland who was jailed after fatally shooting a burglary suspect earlier this week will be released,
according to law enforcement sources. Those sources have not ...

=====

Oakland Police Confirm Homeowner Arrested After Fatally Shooting ...

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/oakland-police-confirm-homeowner-arrested-after-fatally-shooting-burglary-suspect/

Jun 12, 2024 - Oakland police provide details on homeowner shooting possible burglar Monday 03:18. Police in Oakland on Wednesday confirmed that a
homeowner who fatally shot a person trying to gain entry into ...

=====



=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Skeeter
2025-01-11 11:26:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
the left wing media station is feeding you.
If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
Post by pothead
Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
The idea is to save one's skin.
Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
for whatever reason.
Show it.
Post by pothead
Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
and was told multiple times to get back.
Post by pothead
He got a promotion for his "work".
"She should have complied".
She was murdered.
Nope.
If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
window, you'd say the killing was justified.
Nope. I saw the footage.
Great!
Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
they chose to murder her.
She was the one trying to come through the window...
...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
argument.
You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
So show it.
I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
work for you.
It's your work to do.
Nope. You command nothing from me.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
...where there were legislators sheltering...
Bullshit.
Nope.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
window.
She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
no one else got shot?
No one else tried to come through the window.
There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
Except for the unarmed black men...
Who were they? Are they in the video?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
store, you'd call it self-defense.
She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
brought it up.
That's why I'm ASKING you.
You tried to spin it around and put race into it.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
persons is not?
What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
What black people? She was murdered.
She was breaking into an area where law enforcement was protecting people.
Bullshit. They let them in.
They weren't letting them in to the "Speaker Lobby".
The doors were barricaded and the mob was breaking the windows to get
through.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
If she hadn't tried to climb through the window, she wouldn't have been
shot.
Why just her?
She was the one climbing through.
Unarmed.
Skeeter
2025-01-09 13:38:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
http://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q
You should read before you post...
'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
So where is this "available evidence"?
Mitchell Holman
2025-01-09 03:14:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
Typical Trumper: Full of bullshit
claims, runs away when asked for proof.
Skeeter
2025-01-09 13:38:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by pothead
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
they should pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
did the punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
and who were given due process are a different situation.
Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
wandering around outside"?
And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
I don't buy into anything.
Extraordinary claims require support.
Something you never provide.
I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
Typical Trumper: Full of bullshit
claims, runs away when asked for proof.
Unlike you who answers questions with questions and spins to TRUMP
whenever possible.
NoBody
2025-01-09 12:39:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Alan
2025-01-09 19:24:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.

Here's the list:

<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>

Show it.
Skeeter
2025-01-09 22:57:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Alan
2025-01-09 23:02:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.

Just ONE.
Skeeter
2025-01-09 23:58:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.
Just ONE.
Why just one? All of them.
Alan
2025-01-10 03:10:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.
Just ONE.
Why just one? All of them.
Because "all of them" prevents you from actually having to stand by
anything.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 11:59:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.
Just ONE.
Why just one? All of them.
Because "all of them" prevents you from actually having to stand by
anything.
How so? Careful now.
Alan
2025-01-10 17:02:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.
Just ONE.
Why just one? All of them.
Because "all of them" prevents you from actually having to stand by
anything.
How so? Careful now.
Because it prevents refuting you from being a real possibility.
Skeeter
2025-01-10 21:15:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.
Just ONE.
Why just one? All of them.
Because "all of them" prevents you from actually having to stand by
anything.
How so? Careful now.
Because it prevents refuting you from being a real possibility.
Huh? You drinking?
Alan
2025-01-10 21:24:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:53:08 -0000 (UTC), pothead
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by pothead
Post by NoBody
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
+1
I agree.
Do you agree no crimes were committed?
Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
punishment match the "crimes"?
For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
given due process are a different situation.
How dare you be logical and reasonable!
Give an example of someone found guilty who didn't do anything but walk
around the outside.
<https://www.npr.org/2021/02/09/965472049/the-capitol-siege-the-arrested-and-their-stories>
Show it.
Innocent and will be pardoned.
Pick one to say that about.
Just ONE.
Why just one? All of them.
Because "all of them" prevents you from actually having to stand by
anything.
How so? Careful now.
Because it prevents refuting you from being a real possibility.
Huh? You drinking?
Pick one person...

JUST ONE

...that you feel supports your claim that people who "didn't do anything
but walk around the outside." were convicted.

Or admit you can't find one.
AlleyCat
2025-01-09 01:47:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:19:52 -0800, Lee says...
Yes. They attempted to overthrow the Constitution.
Exactly HOW did the demonstrators do that?

What EXACTLY, were the demonstrators going to do to "overthrow the Constitution".

Be specific, instead of the general bullshit platitudes you mealy-mouthed man-butt fuckers employ, like telling everyone Trump is a racist, but given
the chance to explain, often run off like the skeered little gaytard you are.

Bu bu bu heee said that Mexicans were ALL rapists!

Remember... be specific on how the demonstrators were going to "overthrow the Constitution".


=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
Siri Cruise
2025-01-07 20:41:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
And since you deny any crime was committed.....
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
AlleyCat
2025-01-08 03:31:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 07:17:04 -0500, NoBody says...
Post by NoBody
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514
If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
pay the standard penalty before release.
I agree... but I wanted to watch the worms unearth themselves and tell us how they really feel before putting THAT caveat in there.

Yeah, I WAS going to say, "Release them all!, OTHER than those who did some damage or hurt someone," but thought better of it, so I could watch the
libtards fall all over themselves and step into shit I could get them on, like the Antifa, BLM and liberal insurrections we've had that they never
even THINK to call insurrections, but were WAY MORE so, than that of Jan 6th, because they actually DID take over government in places where CHAZ and
CHOP were and caused WAY more damage and actual murders, when there were none on Jan 6th.

Plus, the damage was minimal compared to what Antifa, BLM, and the Liberals did.

$2 million vs. $2 billion

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration
AlleyCat
2025-01-08 03:31:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:17:38 -0800, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman, like me, and who was
*NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a
basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021,
attack on the US Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514
A complete bullshit lie
Naaah... he's not the typical Clinton, Obama or Biden-era LYING, Cheating and stealing FBI agent.

"As many as 200 agents and informants, not just FBI but from some of the other agencies as well, got on buses, were driven to the Capitol wearing
Trump t-shirts and hats and paraphernalia, mega type paraphernalia, and that they went into the Capitol with the demonstrators or with the protesters
or with the rioters. Now, one of the things he points out that, he's been a congressman 7 years, and that he still has a hard time finding his way
around the Capitol, because many of the offices and at the time, Nancy Pelosi's office did not have a sign out in front that says "Speaker of the
House Nancy Pelosi" or anything like that. It's just an incognito type office and that he believes that there were individuals in the Capitol at that
time, disguised as protesters that led the protesters to her office and to other offices that would normally be very difficult to find, and as he put
it, he would have a hard time finding them without somebody leading him to the office. So, that's where he gets his opinion that somehow there were
already law enforcement officers in the Capitol in an undercover capacity as well as in the crowd of people outside the Capitol and came into the
building with them. And then some of them were led to certain spots in the building, again, like Pelosi's office and a few other locations, that
would be very difficult to find if you just weren't familiar with the Capitol and went into the building on your own.

=====
Trump WINS!
Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.
Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.
Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.
Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
A Second Trump Administration
=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

The TL;DR Version: Pathological liars, like Rudy, MAY LOSE HIS JOB, RELATIONSHIPS, AND PUBLIC STANDING BECAUSE THE LIES BECOME TOO RIDICULOUS OR
NUMEROUS.

Called pathological liar, compulsive liar, or habitual liar, Rudy has a
strong tendency to lie or exaggerate. Typically, he has no regard for
the truth.

What Is a Pathological Liar?

Rudy, the pathological liar is a person who lies at a high frequency and
has no regard for the repercussions of his lies. He will lie to anyone
at any time about any issue. The lies could be big or small, detailed or
vague, or orchestrated or spontaneous. For pathological liars, it seems
his only goal is to lie.

Typical lies have a clear purpose, including to avoid trouble, gain
benefit, or impress HIMSELF.

A pathological liar differs from normal lying behavior based on the
frequency, the duration, and the goal of his lies.

The lies that a pathologcal liar, like Rudy, tells, are:

Lies that are extensive and overly complicated Lies and patterns of
lying that last for years or a lifetime Lies that are disproportionate
or unrelated to any end goal Lies that are not a result of another
mental or medical health condition.

Well, we already KNOW that isn't true... Rudy has MULTIPLE mental
problems.

Based on these factors, Rudy's pathological lying could be defined as "a
persistent, pervasive, and often compulsive pattern of excessive lying
behavior that leads to clinically significant impairment of functioning
in social, occupational, or other areas."

Other characteristic of Rudy's pathological lying are:

It causes marked distress to the individual
It poses a risk to others
It occurs for longer than 6 months

Rudy may also be called a:

Compulsive liar
Habitual liar
Chronic liar
Person with mythomania
Person with pseudologia fantastica


5 Signs of Rudy's Pathological Lying:

Because his lies are often concealed well, Rudy, the pathological liar may be
well disguised among other people. With time, the pattern of untruths
and inconsistencies may become more apparent. For the most part, though,
his pathological lies will blend in with the truth, making these statements
challenging to discern. Even discovering the lies may not be enough to
stop the liar from telling them.

Here are five signs of Rudy, the pathological liar:

Speaking in vague or general terms:
(BINGO! or semantically vague... take your pick)

Liars, like Rudy, will try to avoid the future distress of having to recall
what lies he has told to which people by keeping information loose and vague.

Even something benign, like his favorite place to give blowjobs, can turn into a long story with no solid answer.

The goal of this behavior is to keep his answer from conflicting with any lies they may have told in the past.

Being overly specific or detailed: Alternatively, Rudy, the liar, may offer stories with numerous fine points and details. The plan here is to be so
specific that no one could possibly question the truthfulness of the story because the details are convincing.

Inconsistencies in stories: Rudy, the pathological liar, will not have a
perfect memory, so it is only a matter of time before he slips up by confusing
one lie for another. Hearing multiple responses to the same question will be a
way to identify a pathological liar.

Failure to commit to plans or often canceling plans: Rudy the pathological liar will avoid making plans or may make plans and frequently cancel. This
is because he needs to keep his options open for other opportunities.

BECOMING ANGRY AND DEFENSIVE WHEN QUESTIONED: Rudy the liar, will make excuses when caught in a lie. When the other person's patience is thin, Rudy,
the liar, may become angry or defensive to take the focus off of his lies.

**FAGGOT**


5 Characteristics of Pathological Lying

The seeming randomness and unimportance of pathological lies may
surprise people. Some lies will have no influence or impact on a
relationship or situation whatsoever. Any story, situation, or
exaggeration a person can imagine may become a pathological lie.
Specific lies are endless, but they often have commonalities.

Pathological lies share these five characteristics:

Frequency:
Rudy, the pathological liar, lies more often than others and average
about ten or MORE lies per day. In terms of frequency, the lies could all be
variations of the same lie or 10 separate lies. To Rudy, the liar, the actual
lie may not be as important as the process of lying.

Long in duration:
Studies show that Rudy, the pathological liar, will continue with the excessive
lying for at least six decades. He may continue with a lie over the
long-term, or he may move from lie to lie with fluidity. Pathological
liars, like Rudy, are typically able to maintain a lie for years.

Lacking purpose:
Rudy's pathological lies are confounding because they serve no purpose and
accomplish no goal, other than for himself. Rudy, the liar, may say that his favorite color is blue when it is actually orange or that his favorite
food is pizza when it is really lobster. This lie does not benefit the liar, but they say it anyway.

Stress inducing:
Pathological liars, like Rudy, experience higher rates of stress from lying. The stress may come from the intricacy of ongoing lies and the risk of
being caught.

Self-incriminating and defeating:
Standard lies can get Rudy out of trouble, but pathological lies get him into trouble.

Pathological liars, like Rudy, MAY LOSE HIS JOB, RELATIONSHIPS, AND PUBLIC STANDING BECAUSE THE LIES BECOME TOO RIDICULOUS OR NUMEROUS.
Beavis
2025-01-08 15:39:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Donald Trump is expected to grant clemency to over 1,000 people
convicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US
Capitol - Bloomberg
Release them all!
https://x.com/i/status/1876169666093281514
A complete victory!
YAY!
186282@ud0s4.net
2025-01-11 07:43:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
I'm gonna say DON'T PARDON one and all.

MOST of these people were kinda harmless, just
went with the wave and didn't hurt/damage
anyone or anything. They were 'made examples
of' for purely POLITICAL intimidation reasons.

But a FEW ... you can find evil/dangerous people
in every movement/party/etc. THEY have to be
dealt with more harshly.
Siri Cruise
2025-01-11 08:06:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
I'm gonna say DON'T PARDON one and all.
MOST of these people were kinda harmless, just
went with the wave and didn't hurt/damage
anyone or anything. They were 'made examples
of' for purely POLITICAL intimidation reasons.
Just like putting poor bank robbers on trial. Purely political
intimidation
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
186282@ud0s4.net
2025-01-11 09:37:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
I'm gonna say DON'T PARDON one and all.
MOST of these people were kinda harmless, just
went with the wave and didn't hurt/damage
anyone or anything. They were 'made examples
of' for purely POLITICAL intimidation reasons.
Just like putting poor bank robbers on trial. Purely political intimidation
More like hanging starving people for
stealing a crust of bread .....
Loading...