When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today - Sorry Shitstains... You're Wrong... Again

[AlleyCat]

"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."

https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

=====

December:

Ireland's Extreme Cold Warnings Extended

Heavy Snow Buries Japan

Northern Hemisphere Snow Trackers

UK Braces For -20c (-4f)

Ideology Above Energy Security

Finland To -38.9c (-38f)

Madhya Pradesh Freezes

Southern US States Expecting Heaviest Snow In Years

Kashmir's Cold Kills

Record Freeze Grips Pakistan

Depleting European Gas Reserves

Michael Mann Ordered To Pay $530,820.21 In Long-Running Lawsuit

UK Shivers At -13.3c (8f)

Cold Winter Exacerbates Romania Gas Crisis

Arctic Blast Continues Across The U.S.

Rare Snow Sweeps Sahara Desert

Europe Plunges Below -30C (-22F), Sees Heavy Snow

U.S. Endures Record Cold

Rare Tashkurgan Snow

Global Temperature Nudges Lower

Thailand Freezes

Record Snow In Japan

Parts Of Morocco See Snow For First Time In 50 Years

Cattle Futures Hit Record High Amid Looming Arctic Blast

Three-Day Snow Warning For UK

Extreme Snowfall Paralyzes Northern Norway

Siberia Nears -60c (-76f)

Record Snows For Uttarakhand

"Dangerous Cold"

Snow Reaches Athens

Delhi Plunges

U.S. To Freeze

Arctic Ice Up 26%

Dal Lake Freezes Over

Extreme Snow Roundup

Antarctic Sea Ice Recovering Quite Nicely, Thank You

Murcia's Record Lows

Red Alert In Bidar Amid India's Cold Wave

Italian Alps Hit -31.1c (-24f)

U.S. Cold-Deaths Double Since 1999-The Establishment Blames Global Warming

Japan's Record-Breaking Snowfall

BBC Still Pushing Polar Bear Propaganda

White Christmas For Europe

Bengaluru's Record Cold

Xinjiang Plummets To Record -42.5c

Antarctic Sea Ice Extent Higher Now Than In 1979

Bhopal Breaks 58-Year Record

Vostok At -40c (Again)

The Truth About Iceberg A-68

Extreme Cold And Heavy Snow Slam Finland

Europe Wind Power A "Shit Situation," Says Minister

Winter Weather Grips U.S.

India Reels

Vostok Below -40c

Snow Hits Malaga, Spain

Cold Wave Sweeps Pakistan

Canadian Prairies Near -40c

Texans Warned Of "Extreme Cold"

Antarctic Sea Ice Nearing 1979-1990 Average

"Excellent" Early-Season Snow Across The Alps

Delhi's Record Cold

Chilly Waters Stun Record Number Of Turtles

Record Cold Grips Indore

Asia Chills

Record Snowfall In Midwest

Another Round Of Arctic Air To Hit Much Of North America

Mumbai's Lowest Temp In A Decade

Northern Hemisphere Cold

Russia In The Freezer

India Chills

Northern India's Big Freeze Intensifies

Cold Wave Enters Vietnam

Freezing Lows And Heavy Snows Hit U.S., More To Come

Kashmir Freezes At -18c (-0.4f)

Below Average Antarctic Plateau

Another Round Of Lake-Effect Snow

Cold Waves Lifting Natural Gas Prices

Snow Returns To Scotland And Wider Europe

Global Temperature Tumbles

Antarctic Sea Ice Recovery

Severe Cold Hits Pakistan

Florida Set For Record Cold

Snowy November At Red Mountain

U.S. Battered By Cold And Record Snow

Parts Of Ontario Under A Meter Of Snow

Early-December To Deliver Another Burial To Europe

[Alan]

Post by AlleyCat
"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."
https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

<https://sealevel.info/co2.html>

1938: 311

2024: 424

Since when is 311 "nearly half" of 424?


:-)

[JTEM]

Post by Alan
1938: 311
2024: 424
Since when is 311 "nearly half" of 424?

Is 680 high? Because midway through the Oligocene CO2 had
dropped all the way down to 680 ppm. At the very beginning,
when it was much higher, Antarctica froze over...

"We estimate atmospheric CO2 of ∼680 ppm for the mid-Oligocene,
which then evolves to fluctuate between ∼500–570 ppm during the
late Oligocene and between ∼420–700 ppm in the early Miocene."

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022PA004569

Now if the earth is hotter than it's ever been at 424, and
Antarctica FROZE OVER at maybe 800, explain how anyone as
stupid as you manages to pee without staining your socks
yellow?

Assuming you can manage that, of course, which none of us
have any reason to assume...

[Alan]

Post by Alan
1938: 311
2024: 424
Since when is 311 "nearly half" of 424?

Is 680 high?  Because midway through the Oligocene CO2 had
dropped all the way down to 680 ppm. At the very beginning,
when it was much higher, Antarctica froze over...
"We estimate atmospheric CO2 of ∼680 ppm for the mid-Oligocene,
which then evolves to fluctuate between ∼500–570 ppm during the
late Oligocene and between ∼420–700 ppm in the early Miocene."
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022PA004569
Now if the earth is hotter than it's ever been at 424, and
Antarctica FROZE OVER at maybe 800, explain how anyone as
stupid as you manages to pee without staining your socks
yellow?
Assuming you can manage that, of course, which none of us
have any reason to assume...

Straw man.

Who is claiming that "the earth is hotter than it's ever been".

[JTEM]

Post by Alan

Is 680 high?  Because midway through the Oligocene CO2 had
dropped all the way down to 680 ppm. At the very beginning,
when it was much higher, Antarctica froze over...
"We estimate atmospheric CO2 of ∼680 ppm for the mid-Oligocene,
which then evolves to fluctuate between ∼500–570 ppm during the
late Oligocene and between ∼420–700 ppm in the early Miocene."
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022PA004569
Now if the earth is hotter than it's ever been at 424, and
Antarctica FROZE OVER at maybe 800, explain how anyone as
stupid as you manages to pee without staining your socks
yellow?
Assuming you can manage that, of course, which none of us
have any reason to assume...

Straw man.
Who is claiming that "the earth is hotter than it's ever been".

So the fact that we have absolute proof that CO2 can be and has
been TWICE AS HIGH all on it's own, without fossil fuels, and that
this very high CO2 is associated with THE ANTARCTIC FREEZING OVER
is irrelevant to your idiocy about CO2 and climate change?

Wow. You are retarded. It's not just an act.

[Alan]

Post by JTEM

Post by Alan

Is 680 high?  Because midway through the Oligocene CO2 had
dropped all the way down to 680 ppm. At the very beginning,
when it was much higher, Antarctica froze over...
"We estimate atmospheric CO2 of ∼680 ppm for the mid-Oligocene,
which then evolves to fluctuate between ∼500–570 ppm during the
late Oligocene and between ∼420–700 ppm in the early Miocene."
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022PA004569
Now if the earth is hotter than it's ever been at 424, and
Antarctica FROZE OVER at maybe 800, explain how anyone as
stupid as you manages to pee without staining your socks
yellow?
Assuming you can manage that, of course, which none of us
have any reason to assume...

Straw man.
Who is claiming that "the earth is hotter than it's ever been".

So the fact that we have absolute proof that CO2 can be and has
been TWICE AS HIGH all on it's own, without fossil fuels, and that
this very high CO2 is associated with THE ANTARCTIC FREEZING OVER
is irrelevant to your idiocy about CO2 and climate change?
Wow. You are retarded. It's not just an act.

You failed to answer my question:

Who is claiming that "the earth is hotter than it's ever been"?

[JTEM]

You're a retard. You ask stupid questions, all the more
stupid as they are not intended to garner information but
to avoid facts.

CO2 is not a climate driver. Science knows this. There has
never been a lack of proof that the whole stinking AGW
narrative is a farce.

[Alan]

Post by JTEM
You're a retard. You ask stupid questions, all the more
stupid as they are not intended to garner information but
to avoid facts.
CO2 is not a climate driver. Science knows this. There has
never been a lack of proof that the whole stinking AGW
narrative is a farce.

Let me say it again.

You said:

'Now if the earth is hotter than it's ever been at 424'

And I asked:

Who is claiming that "the earth is hotter than it's ever been?

So...

...can you answer?

[AlleyCat]

LOL... I planted a trolling point, and troll-bait fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

Bait: "When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today"

Post by Alan
Since when is 311 "nearly half" of 424?

See? He can't refute that climate change is not at fault for the fires, so he went straight for the bullshit minutiae I put in the post... on
purpose... so he'd end up looking like the faggot nerd he is... not being able to refute the topic, but HAVING to reply anyways, lest someone look
smarter and more attuned to the bullshit going on in our world, than he. - LOL

Poor, low self-esteemed lonely nerd.

"When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" was never the topic, so as to prove the point that Ski Bunny's not here to refute posts, I dangled a
little bait in front of him and he took it like the Dork-Fish he is, JUST like I knew he would.

Loading Image...

I inserted what I KNOW, (since I have all the years' CO² levels going back as far as 1850), not to be true, to show that Ski Bunny CAN'T prove
anything, other than the fact he's here to make him feel better about himself for what's bothering him.

He's here ONLY to argue off-topic bullshit that HE tries to make the topic, because he can't argue the point.

LOL...

... https://i.imgur.com/nZaXEwU.mp4

=====

Original article, as cited.

"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."

https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

============================================================================

THIS Is Why Chicken Shit Chicken Littles Screech About Climate And Weather And Global Warbling:

The UN Makes it Official: Global Warming Hysteria Is All About Redistributing Wealth

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'

Global Study Reveals Wealth Redistribution From Blue-Carbon Ecosystems

Failed Climate Policies Are About Wealth Redistribution

"We Redistribute De Facto The World's Wealth By Climate Policy."

How Global Warming Has Made The Rich Richer
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20190502-how-global-warming-has-made-the-rich-richer

The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/01/22/the-u-n-s-global-warming-war-on-capitalism-an-important-history-lesson-2/?sh=4f89a2d429be

The Doha Wealth Redistribution Process Moves On
https://townhall.com/columnists/davidrothbard/2012/12/14/the-doha-wealth-redistribution-process-moves-on-n1465410

=====

"There is no doubt, that we need to have a complete transformation... the transformation of the economy, and that includes, of course, the private
sector."

A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris
Accord... the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the truth comes out.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a thinly
veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy. "The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a climate thing at all,"
Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE

[Alan]

Post by AlleyCat
LOL... I planted a trolling point, and troll-bait fell for it, hook, line and sinker.
Bait: "When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today"

Post by Alan
Since when is 311 "nearly half" of 424?

See? He can't refute that climate change is not at fault for the
fires, so he went straight for the bullshit minutiae I put in the
post... on purpose... so he'd end up looking like the faggot nerd he
is... not being able to refute the topic, but HAVING to reply
anyways, lest someone look smarter and more attuned to the bullshit
going on in our world, than he. - LOL

I dealt with a complete inaccuracy in what you claimed.

Post by AlleyCat
Poor, low self-esteemed lonely nerd.
"When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" was never the topic, so
as to prove the point that Ski Bunny's not here to refute posts, I
dangled a little bait in front of him and he took it like the Dork-
Fish he is, JUST like I knew he would.
https://i.imgur.com/NhEki0m.png
I inserted what I KNOW, (since I have all the years' CO² levels
going back as far as 1850), not to be true, to show that Ski Bunny
CAN'T prove anything, other than the fact he's here to make him feel
better about himself for what's bothering him.

You "insert what you know not to be true?

Post by AlleyCat
He's here ONLY to argue off-topic bullshit that HE tries to make the
topic, because he can't argue the point.
LOL...
... https://i.imgur.com/nZaXEwU.mp4
=====
Original article, as cited.
"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by
high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in
Southern California today after burning over 50,000 acres of land
and destroying more than 600 homes."
https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

Yes?

And?

You think that because things are warmer overall (the "global") than
they were in 1938 (and they are)...

...you think that there cannot be ANY droughts back then?

[AlleyCat]

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:09:10 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
See? He can't refute that climate change is not at fault for the
fires, so he went straight for the bullshit minutiae I put in the
post... on purpose... so he'd end up looking like the faggot nerd he
is... not being able to refute the topic, but HAVING to reply
anyways, lest someone look smarter and more attuned to the bullshit
going on in our world, than he. - LOL

I dealt with a complete inaccuracy in what you claimed.

There WAS no "inaccuracy". It was a plant and trap, and you fell for it, Mr. NOT Perfect.

The "inaccuracy" was purposely said and set, so as to show everyone just how fucking pedantic you are for focusing on shit that's NOT the topic.

THIS is what you can't stand, so you deflected away from it so you could play your little control game.


"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."

https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

=====

LOL... narcissist fell for a trick.

Sorry... UNdeserved narcissist.

===========================================================================================================================

Why Do People With Narcissistic Personality Disorder Play Games?

At times, it may appear that the goal of someone living with NPD is to get their needs met, which may involve other people who consciously and
unconsciously help them achieve that end, says Dena DiNardo, PhD, a clinical psychologist in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

"These 'games' are strategic manipulations," she adds. "Often, they're completely unconscious. People having trouble with this level of narcissism
are usually in such deep pain that their ability to empathetically connect with the pain of others is low."

What games do people with narcissistic personality disorder play?

Those who live with NPD often HAVE LOW SELF-ESTEEM.

As a result, many games they play may revolve around maintaining a sense of control, so they don't have to be confronted with the shame that they may
feel inside.

This is why Ski Bunny can't post his own shit.

"People with narcissistic personality disorder tend to use strategies to gain power and control over the individual in order to assert superiority
and/or dominance over them," says Rahmah Albugami, a licensed professional counselor in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. "In this way, they get their needs
met TO BOOST THEIR EGOS, VALUE, AND SELF-ESTEEM."

Poor Ski Bunny. :-(

[Alan]

Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:09:10 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
See? He can't refute that climate change is not at fault for the
fires, so he went straight for the bullshit minutiae I put in
the post... on purpose... so he'd end up looking like the faggot
nerd he is... not being able to refute the topic, but HAVING to
reply anyways, lest someone look smarter and more attuned to the
bullshit going on in our world, than he. - LOL

I dealt with a complete inaccuracy in what you claimed.

There WAS no "inaccuracy". It was a plant and trap, and you fell for it, Mr. NOT Perfect.

Bullshit.

Post by AlleyCat
The "inaccuracy" was purposely said and set, so as to show everyone
just how fucking pedantic you are for focusing on shit that's NOT
the topic.

Retconning.

Post by AlleyCat
THIS is what you can't stand, so you deflected away from it so you
could play your little control game.
"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by
high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in
Southern California today after burning over 50,000 acres of land
and destroying more than 600 homes."
https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

Again, just because the world is warmer than it was in 1938 doesn't mean
there weren't droughts back then.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:15:06 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
There WAS no "inaccuracy". It was a plant and trap, and you fell for
it, Mr. NOT Perfect.

Bullshit.

LOL

Denial. A narcissist's first resort on his road to accepting that he has a problem with himself and those he's lost.

You'll get there, gayboy.

1) Denial
2) Anger
3) Bargaining
4) Depression
5) Acceptance

Told you faggot... I HAVE the CO² levels going back to 1850. KNOWING the level of the year I spoke of...

You just can't STAND it that I set you up and you fell for it.

I add shit like that all the time, JUST so you'll ignore the topic and focus on the mundane and shit that doesn't matter nearly HALF as much as the
topic.

Poor wittle narcissist...

... prolly got no sleep last night.

Oh... and let us not forget the topic, if you'd like to comment on that... alone. Otherwise...

PLONK!

=====

When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today - Sorry Shitstains... You're Wrong... Again
Date: 01/11/25 09:25 PM

"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."

https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium


=====

As you can see... THAT was my original post.

I decided to troll your pedantic ass and posted it again, but with a revised title... JUST for you.

=====

When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today - Sorry Shitstains... You're Wrong... Again
Date: 01/11/25 09:25 PM

"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."

https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=large

THIS one was JUST for you.

LOL

============================================================================

Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO

This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong

They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.

But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to explain:

They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem

For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences associated with loss or
failure," says Sharp.

"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as an inherent character fault,"
he explains.

Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their screw-ups are unforgivable.

"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the time, or not even try or make
it seem as if I am'" he says.

Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger

For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good leader admits their mistakes.

"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being fallible tend to be more highly
regarded," the expert explains.

"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's pretty hard to believe," says
the psychologist.

(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)

"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.

Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm sorry but I'll try to fix
it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."

They Don't Value The Truth

(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)

For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.

"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a reality, is that Alan doesn't
value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.

Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value facts. When it comes to the truth,
the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"

"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.

Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will often reveal whether facts or
feelings will influence them more.

"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains. "Other people make their decisions
based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an emotional person because it just won't wear... you're talking
different languages.

[Alan]

Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:15:06 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
There WAS no "inaccuracy". It was a plant and trap, and you fell for
it, Mr. NOT Perfect.

Bullshit.

LOL
Denial. A narcissist's first resort on his road to accepting that he has a problem with himself and those he's lost.

LOL!

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:15:06 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan
Again, just because the world is warmer than it was in 1938 doesn't mean
there weren't droughts back then.

LOL... you WOULD believe that, since you are a U.S. government-run agency shill.

The NOAA and NASA have been lying to you for years, and you're too stupid to know it.

============================================================================

NASA has been lying about climate every since James Hansen realized he could gain prestige, publicity and money by doing so. It is time for the Trump
administration to end funding for the #ClimateScam

https://dailykos.com/stories/2011/1/20/937772

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg4KQcjaMAQ53VI?format=png&name=900x900

=====

NASA used to know that 1921 was the second warmest year on record in the US, but that didn't suit their political agenda, so they altered the data to
turn cooling into warming.

Loading Image...

https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_ha03200f.pdf

https://i.imgur.com/18CREPK.mp4

=====

In 1992, academics said Earth was not warming. This was not profitable for their #ClimateScam, so later that decade they rewrote history to show
unprecedented warming.

https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/figts-5.htm

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1992/12/01/831892.html?pageNumber=50

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhLzSC7bwAANjE_?format=png&name=small

=====

From 1818 to 1824 North America was in drought, and from 1825-1840 North America was wet. Climate is cyclical and it has nothing to do with the
burning of fossil fuels.

https://academia.edu/47830394/North_American_1818_1824_drought_and_1825_1840_pluvial_and_their_possible_relation_to_the_atmospheric_circulation?
email_work_card=title

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhF9zxvbMAAeMiN?format=jpg&name=medium

=====

[AlleyCat]

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:09:10 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
I inserted what I KNOW, (since I have all the years' CO² levels
going back as far as 1850), not to be true, to show that Ski Bunny
CAN'T prove anything, other than the fact he's here to make him feel
better about himself for what's bothering him.

You "insert what you know not to be true?

Yes... to trick you into acting the pedantic little shit you are... and you fell for it... LOL

Mr. I think I'm the smartest nerd in the room, ain't so smart, is he?

Now, WHY would I fuck up saying "nearly half", when I have a graph AND a text file with CO² levels?

This is probably going to look like shit, so here's a shot:

Loading Image...


Global Mean CO2 Mixing Ratios (ppm): Observations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Data
Source Year MixR Yar MixR Source Year MixR Year MixR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ice- 1850 285.2 1900 295.7 1950 311.3 2000 369.64
Core 1851 285.1 1901 296.2 1951 311.8 2001 371.15
Data 1852 285.0 1902 296.6 1952 312.2 2002 373.15
Adjus- 1853 285.0 1903 297.0 1953 312.6 2003 375.64
ted 1854 284.9 1904 297.5 1954 313.2 NOAA/ 2004 377.44
for 1855 285.1 1905 298.0 1955 313.7 ESRL/ 2005 379.46
Global 1856 285.4 1906 298.4 1956 314.3 trends 2006 381.59
Mean 1857 285.6 1907 298.8 1957 314.8 change 2007 383.37
1858 285.9 1908 299.3 SIO 1958 315.34 added 2008 385.46
1859 286.1 1909 299.7 Mauna 1959 316.18 to 2009 386.95
1860 286.4 1910 300.1 Loa 1960 317.07 2003 2010 389.21
1861 286.6 1911 300.6 & 1961 317.73 data 2011 391.15
1862 286.7 1912 301.0 South 1962 318.43
1863 286.8 1913 301.3 Pole 1963 319.08
1864 286.9 1914 301.4 Adjus- 1964 319.65
1865 287.1 1915 301.6 ted 1965 320.23
1866 287.2 1916 302.0 for 1966 321.59
1867 287.3 1917 302.4 Global 1967 322.31
1868 287.4 1918 302.8 Mean 1968 323.04
1869 287.5 1919 303.0 1969 324.23
1870 287.7 1920 303.4 1970 325.54
1871 287.9 1921 303.7 1971 326.42
1872 288.0 1922 304.1 1972 327.45
1873 288.2 1923 304.5 1973 329.43
1874 288.4 1924 304.9 1974 330.21
1875 288.6 1925 305.3 CMDL 1975 331.36
1876 288.7 1926 305.8 InSitu 1976 331.92
1877 288.9 1927 306.2 Mauna 1977 333.73
1878 289.5 1928 306.6 Loa 1978 335.42
1879 290.1 1929 307.2 & 1979 337.10
1880 290.8 1930 307.5 South 1980 338.99
1881 291.4 1931 308.0 Pole 1981 340.36
1882 292.0 1932 308.3 1982 341.57
1883 292.5 1933 308.9 CMDL 1983 342.53
1884 292.9 1934 309.3 Flask 1984 344.24
1885 293.3 1935 309.7 Mean 1985 345.72
1886 293.8 1936 310.1 of 1986 347.15
1887 294.0 1937 310.6 Many 1987 348.93
1888 294.1 1938 311.0 Sites 1988 351.47
1889 294.2 1939 311.2 1989 353.15
1890 294.4 1940 311.3 1990 354.29
1891 294.6 1941 311.0 1991 355.68
1892 294.8 1942 310.7 1992 356.42
1893 294.7 1943 310.5 1993 357.13
1894 294.8 1944 310.2 1994 358.61
1895 294.8 1945 310.3 1995 360.67
1896 294.9 1946 310.3 1996 362.58
1897 294.9 1947 310.4 1997 363.48
1898 294.9 1948 310.5 1998 366.27
1899 295.3 1949 310.9 1999 368.38

References

1850-1957: D.M. Etheridge, L.P. Steele, R.L. Langenfelds, R.J. Francey, J.-M. Barnola and V.I. Morgan, 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 101,
4115-4128, "Natural and anthroupogenic changes in atmospheric CO2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn".

1958-1974: Means of Scripps Institution of Oceanography Continuous Data at Mauna Loa and South Pole provided by KenMaarie (personal
communication)

1975-1982: Means of NOAA/CMDL in-situ data at Mauna Loa and South Pole. (P. Tans and K.W. Thoning, ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/in-
situ)

1983-2003: Global means constructed using about 70 CMDL CCGG Sampling Network station data. (P.P. Tans and T.J. Conway,
ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/flask)

2004-2007: Global mean growth rates. (T. Conway, ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends)

============================================================================

THIS Is Why Chicken Shit Chicken Littles Screech About Climate And Weather And Global Warbling:

The UN Makes it Official: Global Warming Hysteria Is All About Redistributing Wealth

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'

Global Study Reveals Wealth Redistribution From Blue-Carbon Ecosystems

Failed Climate Policies Are About Wealth Redistribution

"We Redistribute De Facto The World's Wealth By Climate Policy."

How Global Warming Has Made The Rich Richer
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20190502-how-global-warming-has-made-the-rich-richer

The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/01/22/the-u-n-s-global-warming-war-on-capitalism-an-important-history-lesson-2/?sh=4f89a2d429be

The Doha Wealth Redistribution Process Moves On
https://townhall.com/columnists/davidrothbard/2012/12/14/the-doha-wealth-redistribution-process-moves-on-n1465410

=====

"There is no doubt, that we need to have a complete transformation... the transformation of the economy, and that includes, of course, the private
sector."

A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris
Accord... the ONLY purpose.

Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the truth comes out.

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change..."

AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aocs-top-aide-admits-green-new-deal-
about-the-economy-not-the-climate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a thinly
veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy. "The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a climate thing at all,"
Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The Washington Post.

*****

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE

[Alan]

Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:09:10 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
I inserted what I KNOW, (since I have all the years' CO² levels
going back as far as 1850), not to be true, to show that Ski Bunny
CAN'T prove anything, other than the fact he's here to make him feel
better about himself for what's bothering him.

You "insert what you know not to be true?

Yes... to trick you into acting the pedantic little shit you are... and you fell for it... LOL
Mr. I think I'm the smartest nerd in the room, ain't so smart, is he?
Now, WHY would I fuck up saying "nearly half", when I have a graph AND a text file with CO² levels?

Why?

Because you read it in a tweet and reposted it without thinking.

You're not bright enough or thorough enough to have checked the truth of
it before posting.

But go ahead, and prove me wrong by showing me the tweet you pulled this
image from:

<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium>

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:25:15 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
Now, WHY would I fuck up saying "nearly half", when I have a graph AND a text file with CO² levels?

Because you read it in a tweet and reposted it without thinking.

Nope. That's another pansy-ass pussy pedantic Cuntnadian liberal lie.

If you can find "When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" on Twitter regarding the California fires of 1938, I will stop posting for a week.

Oh... and PLONK! unless you talk about the topic. My posting "When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" in the title box is NOT the topic. It was a
jab and a trap at and for you.

"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938 - (U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."

https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium

Oh, and I don't think I care to look up where you said today is warmer than the 20s and 30s.

Nope.

The only reason YOU think that, is because you have to back what the US Government-run agencies say to further the fucked up agendas of the left.

The NOAA and NASA have cooled the early part of the 20th century to make it look as though Earth is on fire, when in truth, it was warmer... then.
And let's not EVEN go into the last 10,000 years, when it was warmer at LEAST half the time.

Loading Image...

Loading Image...

Remember...

"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938 - (U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."
https://newspapers.com/image/740269701
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=large

or...

PLONK!

LOL

=====

Do you know someone who is overly concerned with INSIGNIFICANT DETAILS and TRIVIAL RULES?

Those who THINK they're flaunting their intellectual superiority at every chance?

Dealing With Pedantic Pussies

This annoying behavior is called pedantry - and learning to handle pedantic people can save your sanity!

As a data analyst passionate about psychology and communication, I've had my fair share of encounters with pedantic friends, colleagues, and family
members over the years. In this comprehensive guide, I'll draw on research and personal experience to explore the pedantic personality, provide tips
to manage interactions, and reveal how we can foster more empathy.
What Does "Pedantic" Really Mean?

The word "pedantic" traces its roots back to the Greek "pedantes" meaning "teacher" or "slave who escorted children to school" - quite a literal
origin!

In modern usage, pedantic refers to someone who:

Annoys others by correcting minor errors
Focuses too much on precise definitions or trivial details
Shows off their own knowledge and expertise, especially on boring topics
Emphasizes following formal rules and traditional ways of doing things
Uses complex vocabulary to sound very scholarly

Ultimately, pedantry stems from a desire to display intellectual dominance and feel smarter than others through conversations.
Key Traits of a Pedantic Personality

While we all may act pedantic occasionally, some core characteristics mark those with an ingrained pedantic personality:

Formal speaking style - Pedants favor an elaborate, "textbook" way of communicating versus casual language.

Obsession with obscure details - Minor, academic facts captivate the pedant's interest, more than relatable human experiences.

Intellectual competitiveness - Pedants like engaging in debates and intellectual sparring to flex their knowledge.

Lecturing tendency - Pedants jump at any chance to share unprompted advice and corrections.

Rigid thinking - Pedants strictly adhere to rules and traditional structures over situational flexibility.

Social awkwardness - Many pedants lack skills to connect casually and read social cues.

According to a 2022 study in Psychology Today, an estimated 15% of the population exhibits moderately to highly pedantic tendencies.
What Motivates Pedantic Behavior?

Understanding the root causes behind pedantry can help us better address it with empathy. Here are some of the key motivations:
Signaling Superiority

Pedantic actions like correcting "errors" no one else notices or using fancy jargon can implicitly signal one's supposed intellectual superiority.
Sociologists describe this as an unconscious strategy to gain status by displaying specialized knowledge.
Reassuring Intelligence

Pointing out others' mistakes and peppering speech with big words helps reassure pedantic people of their own academic competence. This balances out
deep-rooted insecurities around intelligence and self-worth.
Autism Spectrum Conditions

Some autistic individuals exhibit pedantic communication patterns. Their factual focus reflects a neurodiverse cognitive style, rather than an ego-
driven need for dominance.
Social Disconnection

Pedantry may reflect an underlying difficulty with casual human interaction. Rigid rules feel safer than complex social dynamics. Pedants often lack
emotional intelligence and receptiveness.

In summary, pedantic tendencies likely stem from a desire to gain status, anxiety around self-image, neurological differences, or poor social skills.
With that understanding, we can approach pedants with more compassion.
Fun Facts About Pedantic Word Origins!

Since pedantic people love random trivia, here are some playful etymology facts around the word "pedant" and related terms:

"Pedagogue" meaning teacher shares the same Greek root as "pedant."

"Didactic" traces to the Ancient Greek for "apt at teaching."

"Sesquipedalian" uses advanced vocabulary to describe someone who uses advanced vocabulary.

"Loquacious" derives from the Latin for "talk" - quite fitting!

"Pauciloquent" combines Latin roots for "few" and "speak" - the opposite of loquacious.

I hope these fun linguistic facts entertained my fellow etymology nerds out there!
Spotting Pedantic Behavior in the Wild

What does pedantry actually look like in everyday life? Here are some classic examples:

Correcting typos or grammar in emails - Even minor technical errors send pedants into a tizzy.

Lecturing people on obscure historical facts - Pedants seize any chance to showcase their intellectual trivia.

Using unnecessarily complex vocabulary - Simple words bore pedants, who prefer sesquipedalian speech.

Criticizing creative rule-breaking - Pedants despise those who don't rigidly follow standard procedures.

Recommending tedious documentaries - Pedants enjoy "intellectual" TV, not fun entertainment.

Debating passionately about math proofs - Abstract technical topics energize the pedant.

Scoffing at intuitive decisions - Pedants think logic overrides human emotions or instincts.

Picking apart logical fallacies - Finding argument flaws proves their superior critical thinking.

[Alan]

Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:25:15 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
Now, WHY would I fuck up saying "nearly half", when I have a
graph AND a text file with CO² levels?

Because you read it in a tweet and reposted it without thinking.

Nope. That's another pansy-ass pussy pedantic Cuntnadian liberal lie.
If you can find "When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" on
Twitter regarding the California fires of 1938, I will stop posting
for a week.
Oh... and PLONK! unless you talk about the topic. My posting "When
CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" in the title box is NOT the
topic. It was a jab and a trap at and for you.

Riiiiiiight.

This is you retconning.

[AlleyCat]

On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:45:43 -0800, Alan says...

Post by Alan

Post by AlleyCat
Oh... and PLONK! unless you talk about the topic. My posting "When
CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today" in the title box is NOT the
topic. It was a jab and a trap at and for you.

Riiiiiiight.
This is you retconning.

I knew you couldn't refute the topic.

=====

Trump WINS!

Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.

Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

A Second Trump Administration