Discussion:
New York "trials" and election interference
Add Reply
NoBody
2024-04-16 12:23:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle? No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.

"Jury selection in former President Donald Trump's historic criminal
trial in New York will continue for a second "day on Tuesday, when the
process of seating potential jurors resumes as the defendant looks on.

The first batch of jurors were sworn in on Monday after pretrial
arguments over evidence and rules for the proceedings. Roughly two
thirds of the group of 96 New Yorkers were quickly dismissed, with
most of them saying they wouldn't be able to be fair and impartial in
the trial. Others were excused for various other reasons, including
their answers to a list of questions posed to each juror."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/trump-trial-set-to-continue-with-second-day-of-jury-selection-in-new-york/ar-BB1lI1lj

A fair trial in New York? Not possible especially with the judges and
prosecutors engaging in election interference.

We make Venezuela look Democratic.
Max Boot
2024-04-16 15:05:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle? No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
The reason is Trump. If he hadn't kept seeking unreasonable delays in all of his
trials, they would already be over. Trump is the one who pushed them deep into
the election cycle.

There is no election interference aspect to the trials — none whatsoever.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 15:44:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:05:51 -0700
Post by Max Boot
The reason is Trump.
Poor Phil Hendry/tRudy Canoza, he wanted all the notoriety the late Art
Bell had in the fringe radio market, but everyone hated him for his
manipulative voice-overs of characters that existed only in his
tortured mind.

In essence tRudy used Phil's functional mental illness as a proxy for
his own decrepit schizophrenia and MPD.

Bit of a case of life imitating art, this one is...

Well sheeitburgers from Suckramento...here he goes again!

It's another tRudy sock up:

From: Mike Colangelo <***@vatican_.con>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com

MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Max Boot <***@lathymes.com>
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com

From: NoBody <***@nowhere.corn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: OrigInfoJunkie <***@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: "Mr. B1ack" <***@dogshit~rag.nut>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com

From: Lou Bricano <***@cap.con>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com



MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Rudy Canoza <***@hendrie.con>
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com



Michael A Terrell <***@earthlink.nut>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com

Now tRudy, can you fire up your Gunner Asch sock too?

You pathetic slithering traitor to America.
Alan
2024-04-16 16:08:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Max Boot
Post by NoBody
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle?  No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
The reason is Trump. If he hadn't kept seeking unreasonable delays in
all of his trials, they would already be over. Trump is the one who
pushed them deep into the election cycle.
There is no election interference aspect to the trials — none whatsoever.
And since he has proclaimed he would definitely be found innocent, he
should have wanted them speedily concluded.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 16:37:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:08:41 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Max Boot
There is no election interference aspect to the trials — none whatsoever.
And since he has proclaimed he would definitely be found innocent, he
should have wanted them speedily concluded.
Never spend today what can be held until right before the election.
Alan
2024-04-16 18:24:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:08:41 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Max Boot
There is no election interference aspect to the trials — none whatsoever.
And since he has proclaimed he would definitely be found innocent, he
should have wanted them speedily concluded.
Never spend today what can be held until right before the election.
Trump is the one who has delayed this so much, doofus.

The indictment for these charges came down on March 30...

...2023.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 20:58:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:24:06 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump is the one who has delayed this
Good - keep it fresh before the election!
Alan
2024-04-16 21:03:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:24:06 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump is the one who has delayed this
Good - keep it fresh before the election!
So no further mention from you about how this is election interference
to be holding the trial now.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 22:11:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:03:45 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:24:06 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump is the one who has delayed this
Good - keep it fresh before the election!
So no further mention from you about how this is election
interference to be holding the trial now.
See no pot/kettle just Ds and Rs playing Uniparty.
super70s
2024-04-16 23:38:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:24:06 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump is the one who has delayed this
Good - keep it fresh before the election!
So no further mention from you about how this is election interference
to be holding the trial now.
The grandaddy of all election interferers suddenly whining "election
interference" at every opportunity, precious.
Governor Swill
2024-04-17 06:00:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by super70s
Post by Alan
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:24:06 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump is the one who has delayed this
Good - keep it fresh before the election!
So no further mention from you about how this is election interference
to be holding the trial now.
The grandaddy of all election interferers suddenly whining "election
interference" at every opportunity, precious.
Dozo the Clown.

HAW HAW HAW HAW !!!!

Swill
--
Conservative thinking only predicts the past. - R Kym Horsell

https://www.gocomics.com/mattdavies/2024/04/01

https://www.forwardparty.com/ . .

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
Max Boot
2024-04-16 17:25:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Max Boot
Post by NoBody
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle?  No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
The reason is Trump. If he hadn't kept seeking unreasonable delays in all of
his trials, they would already be over. Trump is the one who pushed them deep
into the election cycle.
There is no election interference aspect to the trials — none whatsoever.
And since he has proclaimed he would definitely be found innocent, he should
have wanted them speedily concluded.
Agreed, up to a point. At least, that's partially the case if Trump is telling
the truth about his confidence that he would be found innocent. However, this
gets to his entire immunity claim. If Trump really has immunity from prosecution
on some charge, then he would have a right not to be tried at all, regardless of
whether or not he is confident of an acquittal. I think most legal scholars
believe his claims of immunity are bullshit. Trump and his asshole lawyers are
advancing the clearly wrong theory that *anything* Trump did *while* president
becomes a "presidential act." So if he became enraged and kicked his toady
Waltine Nauta in the crotch, he would have immunity from prosecution after
leaving office because that was a "presidential act." That cannot possibly be
true. It's as absurd as the Seal Team 6 hypothetical. It is *not* the case that
anything a president does while in office is a "presidential act."

I think Trump has *little* confidence of an acquittal, and that's why he keeps
trying to delay trial. It has worked very well for him in the past.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 17:45:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:25:41 -0700
Post by Max Boot
It has worked very well for him
Poor Phil Hendry/tRudy Canoza, he wanted all the notoriety the late Art
Bell had in the fringe radio market, but everyone hated him for his
manipulative voice-overs of characters that existed only in his
tortured mind.

In essence tRudy used Phil's functional mental illness as a proxy for
his own decrepit schizophrenia and MPD.

Bit of a case of life imitating art, this one is...

Well sheeitburgers from Suckramento...here he goes again!

It's another tRudy sock up:

From: Ubiquitous <***@polaris.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: Eunice Wunderlich <***@starkville.cemetery.con>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: Don Shepler <***@shitbags.united>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: "T. Howard Pines, Jr." <***@kfi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: Fred J McCall <***@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: "Fred C. Dobbs" <***@sierramadre.con>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: "T. Howard Pines, Jr." <***@kfi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: Mike Colangelo <***@vatican_.con>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Max Boot <***@lathymes.com>
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: NoBody <***@nowhere.corn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: OrigInfoJunkie <***@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com


From: "Mr. B1ack" <***@dogshit~rag.nut>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com

From: Lou Bricano <***@cap.con>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com



MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Rudy Canoza <***@hendrie.con>
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com



Michael A Terrell <***@earthlink.nut>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com

Now tRudy, can you fire up your Gunner Asch sock too?

You pathetic slithering traitor to America.
Alan
2024-04-16 18:26:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Max Boot
Post by Alan
Post by Max Boot
Post by NoBody
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle?  No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
The reason is Trump. If he hadn't kept seeking unreasonable delays in
all of his trials, they would already be over. Trump is the one who
pushed them deep into the election cycle.
There is no election interference aspect to the trials — none whatsoever.
And since he has proclaimed he would definitely be found innocent, he
should have wanted them speedily concluded.
Agreed, up to a point. At least, that's partially the case if Trump is
telling the truth about his confidence that he would be found innocent.
However, this gets to his entire immunity claim. If Trump really has
immunity from prosecution on some charge, then he would have a right not
to be tried at all, regardless of whether or not he is confident of an
acquittal. I think most legal scholars believe his claims of immunity
are bullshit. Trump and his asshole lawyers are advancing the clearly
wrong theory that *anything* Trump did *while* president becomes a
"presidential act." So if he became enraged and kicked his toady Waltine
Nauta in the crotch, he would have immunity from prosecution after
leaving office because that was a "presidential act." That cannot
possibly be true. It's as absurd as the Seal Team 6 hypothetical. It is
*not* the case that anything a president does while in office is a
"presidential act."
I think Trump has *little* confidence of an acquittal, and that's why he
keeps trying to delay trial. It has worked very well for him in the past.
Oh, I completely agree.

:-)
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 20:59:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:26:23 -0700
Post by Max Boot
It has worked very well for him in the past.
Oh, I completely agree.
:-)
And will again.
Alan
2024-04-16 16:08:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle? No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
Trump's the one who has been delaying and delaying.
Post by NoBody
"Jury selection in former President Donald Trump's historic criminal
trial in New York will continue for a second "day on Tuesday, when the
process of seating potential jurors resumes as the defendant looks on.
The first batch of jurors were sworn in on Monday after pretrial
arguments over evidence and rules for the proceedings. Roughly two
thirds of the group of 96 New Yorkers were quickly dismissed, with
most of them saying they wouldn't be able to be fair and impartial in
the trial. Others were excused for various other reasons, including
their answers to a list of questions posed to each juror."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/trump-trial-set-to-continue-with-second-day-of-jury-selection-in-new-york/ar-BB1lI1lj
A fair trial in New York? Not possible especially with the judges and
prosecutors engaging in election interference.
An assertion without any foundation.
Post by NoBody
We make Venezuela look Democratic.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 16:36:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:08:00 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump's the one who has been delaying and delaying.
Helps set the tonality up to favor his election, given the national
short attention span.
Alan
2024-04-16 18:27:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:08:00 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump's the one who has been delaying and delaying.
Helps set the tonality up to favor his election, given the national
short attention span.
If he really wanted it to be out of the public consciousness by election
day, he would have had a trial back in 2023.
Lil-man-ball
2024-04-16 20:59:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:27:08 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:08:00 -0700
Post by Alan
Trump's the one who has been delaying and delaying.
Helps set the tonality up to favor his election, given the national
short attention span.
If he really wanted it to be out of the public consciousness by
election day, he would have had a trial back in 2023.
Yes.

Never play your cards too early.
pyotr filipivich
2024-04-16 16:56:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
Why is it necessary to have the trials just this moment during the
election cycle?  No one has come up with a reasonable explanation.
Trump's the one who has been delaying and delaying.
Exactly. This is *classic* Kremlin Girl crying and whinging. If the indictments
had come any earlier, she would have been shrieking about "rush to judgment" and
how it "proves" that the cases are "only political." So they come following
detailed investigation and due diligence by the prosecution, *Trump* delays them
for months and months, and now Kremlin Girl is howling that they constitute
"election interference." They are all fucking hypocrites.
Post by Alan
Post by NoBody
"Jury selection in former President Donald Trump's historic criminal
trial in New York will continue for a second "day on Tuesday, when the
process of seating potential jurors resumes as the defendant looks on.
The first batch of jurors were sworn in on Monday after pretrial
arguments over evidence and rules for the proceedings. Roughly two
thirds of the group of 96 New Yorkers were quickly dismissed, with
most of them saying they wouldn't be able to be fair and impartial in
the trial. Others were excused for various other reasons, including
their answers to a list of questions posed to each juror."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/trump-trial-set-to-continue-with-second-day-of-jury-selection-in-new-york/ar-BB1lI1lj
A fair trial in New York?  Not possible especially with the judges and
prosecutors engaging in election interference.
An assertion without any foundation.
Spot-on correct.
Loading...